ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04829214

OTO-313 in Subjects With Unilateral Subjective Tinnitus

NCT04829214, Phase 2, Completed, Otonomy, Inc.; results first posted 2023-01-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. OTO-313 in Subjects With Unilateral Subjective Tinnitus. Trials, record NCT04829214. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04829214

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
OTO-313 in Subjects With Unilateral Subjective Tinnitus
NCT number
NCT04829214
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
153 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Otonomy, Inc.
Conditions
Subjective Tinnitus
Interventions
OTO-313, Placebo
First posted
2021-04-02
Last updated
2023-01-06
Results first posted
2023-01-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) Responders at Weeks 4 and at Week 8Week 4 and Week 8 (both had to meet criterion for the subject to be considered a "responder")
The TFI is a validated, 25-item questionnaire; index score from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate a greater problem with tinnitus. A responder is considered as any subject with at least a 13-point improvement from Baseline on the (TFI). This responder analysis required both Week 4 and Week 8 to have a 13-point improvement from Baseline.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Daily Tinnitus Loudness at Week 8The average is calculated for the Baseline and for each study week. Reported here is the change from Baseline to Week 8.
Numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 (No Tinnitus) to 10 (Extremely Loud Tinnitus) collected every day. Post-baseline weekly NRS scores will be calculated as the average score of all recorded diary entries within each study week.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Daily Tinnitus Annoyance at Week 8The average is calculated for the Baseline and for each study week. Reported here is the change from Baseline to Week 8
Numerical rating scale from 0 (Not Annoying) to 10 (Extremely Annoying) collected every day. Post-baseline weekly NRS scores will be calculated as the average score of all recorded diary entries within each study week.
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Change at Week 8Week 8 reported here
Change in overall tinnitus status as perceived by the subject as assessed at the Week 8 visit. Subjects were asked, "Since the beginning of the clinical study, how would you rate your tinnitus?" and had the choice to answer from very much worse (-3) to very much improved (3). The mean change from baseline at Week 8 is reported here.
OtherOtoscopic Examinations - Presence of Perforation in the Treated Ear at Week 16 (Final Visit)After dosing (Baseline) up to end of study (16 Weeks)
Ear examinations were done at every visit. One of the important safety endpoints is an observation of a perforation in the ear drum that did not heal properly after the injection. Reported here are the Week 16 (final visit) results.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) Responders at Weeks 4 and at Week 8Week 4 and Week 8 (both had to meet criterion for the subject to be considered a responder)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Daily Tinnitus Loudness at Week 8The average is calculated for the Baseline and for each study week. Reported here is the change from Baseline to Week 8.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Daily Tinnitus Annoyance at Week 8The average is calculated for the Baseline and for each study week. Reported here is the change from Baseline to Week 8units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPatient Global Impression of Change at Week 8Week 8 reported herescore on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDOtoscopic Examinations - Presence of Perforation in the Treated Ear at Week 16 (Final Visit)After dosing (Baseline) up to end of study (16 Weeks)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group10

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) Responders at Weeks 4 and at Week 8OTO-313 Full Analysis Set20Participants
Percentage of Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) Responders at Weeks 4 and at Week 8Placebo Full Analysis Set27Participants
Change From Baseline in Daily Tinnitus Loudness at Week 8OTO-313 Full Analysis Set-0.67Standard Deviation 1.767units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Daily Tinnitus Loudness at Week 8Placebo Full Analysis Set-0.90Standard Deviation 1.557units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Daily Tinnitus Annoyance at Week 8OTO-313 Full Analysis Set-0.73Standard Deviation 1.910units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Daily Tinnitus Annoyance at Week 8Placebo Full Analysis Set-1.11Standard Deviation 1.804units on a scale
Patient Global Impression of Change at Week 8OTO-313 Full Analysis Set0.32Standard Error 0.139score on a scale
Patient Global Impression of Change at Week 8Placebo Full Analysis Set0.36Standard Error 0.138score on a scale
Otoscopic Examinations - Presence of Perforation in the Treated Ear at Week 16 (Final Visit)OTO-313 Safety Analysis Set0Participants
Otoscopic Examinations - Presence of Perforation in the Treated Ear at Week 16 (Final Visit)Placebo Safety Analysis Set0Participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
RandomizationSTARTEDOTO-31377
RandomizationSTARTEDPlacebo76
RandomizationCOMPLETEDOTO-31377
RandomizationCOMPLETEDPlacebo76
RandomizationNOT COMPLETEDOTO-3130
RandomizationNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo0
Follow-up and Efficacy AnalysisSTARTEDOTO-31377
Follow-up and Efficacy AnalysisSTARTEDPlacebo76
Follow-up and Efficacy AnalysisCOMPLETEDOTO-31370
Follow-up and Efficacy AnalysisCOMPLETEDPlacebo72

Adverse events24

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHypertensionVascular disordersOTO-313 Safety Analysis Set0770
otherHypertensionVascular disordersPlacebo Safety Analysis Set2762
otherBlood Potassium IncreasedInvestigationsOTO-313 Safety Analysis Set0770
otherBlood Potassium IncreasedInvestigationsPlacebo Safety Analysis Set2762
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersOTO-313 Safety Analysis Set1771
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo Safety Analysis Set2762
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersOTO-313 Safety Analysis Set8778
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo Safety Analysis Set8768
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersOTO-313 Safety Analysis Set2772
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo Safety Analysis Set1761

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityOTO-313 Safety Analysis Set077
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Safety Analysis Set076
Total, other adverse eventsOTO-313 Safety Analysis Set2377
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Safety Analysis Set2476
Total, serious adverse eventsOTO-313 Safety Analysis Set277
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Safety Analysis Set076

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
OTO-313 Safety Analysis Set vs Placebo Safety Analysis Set: Otoscopic Examinations - Presence of Perforation in the Treated Ear at Week 16 (Final Visit)Trial comparisons
OTO-313 Full Analysis Set vs Placebo Full Analysis Set: Percentage of Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) Responders at Weeks 4 and at Week 8Trial comparisons
OTO-313 Safety Analysis Set vs Placebo Safety Analysis Set: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
OTO-313 Safety Analysis Set vs Placebo Safety Analysis Set: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04829214

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04829214/events?page=2