ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04849988

A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ABP-450 in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia

NCT04849988, Phase 2, Completed, AEON Biopharma, Inc.; results first posted 2024-02-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ABP-450 in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia. Trials, record NCT04849988. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04849988

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ABP-450 in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
NCT number
NCT04849988
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
61 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AEON Biopharma, Inc.
Conditions
Cervical Dystonia
Interventions
ABP-450, Placebo
First posted
2021-04-20
Last updated
2024-02-14
Results first posted
2024-02-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related Serious Adverse EventsBaseline up to 20 Weeks
The primary safety endpoint will be the number of participants with treatment-related serious adverse events since the start of treatment by Treatment Group when dosed with placebo, ABP-450 (low dose), ABP-450 (medium d dose), or ABP-450 (high dose).
SecondaryMean Change of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total Score From Baseline to Week 4Baseline to Week 4
The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) scale is used to assess the severity of cervical Dystonia. The TWSTRS-total score has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 85, where higher scores represent worse outcomes. It comprises 3 subscales, which are summated to get the total score: the Torticollis Severity Scale (minimum score of 0, maximum score of 35), the Disability Scale (minimum score of 0, maximum score of 30), and the Pain Scale (minimum score of 0, maximum score of 20).
SecondaryMean Change in the Subscale Score of Disability of the Baseline Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) From Baseline to Week 4Baseline to Week 4
The Disability subscale of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) is used to assess the severity of disability in cervical dystonia. The disability subscale has a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 30, where higher scores represent worse outcomes.
SecondaryMean Change in the Subscale Score of Pain of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) From Baseline to Week 4Baseline to Week 4
The Pain subscale of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) is used to assess the severity of pain in cervical dystonia. The pain subscale has a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 20, where higher scores represent worse outcomes.
SecondaryMean Change in the Subscale Score of Severity of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) From Baseline to Week 4Baseline to Week 4
The Severity subscale of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) is used to assess the severity of torticollis in cervical dystonia. The severity subscale has a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 35, where higher scores represent worse outcomes.
SecondaryMean Change in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) From Baseline to Week 4Baseline to Week 4
The PGI-C enables the patient to rate changes in their perception of their general health status over the duration of the assessment via a 7-point scale ranging from "much improved" to "much worse". The 7-point scale range is much improved (+3) to much worse (-3) with no change at "0". The mean change in the subject's assessment of the change in clinical status since the start of treatment measured by the Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Scale was assessed by Treatment Group at Week 4.
SecondaryMean Change in Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) From Baseline to Week 4Baseline to Week 4
The CGI-C enables the patient to rate changes in their perception of their general health status over the duration of the assessment via a 7-point scale ranging from "much improved" to "much worse". The 7-point scale range is much improved (+3) to much worse (-3) with no change at "0". The mean change from Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Score was assessed by Treatment Group at Week 4.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related Serious Adverse EventsBaseline up to 20 WeeksAll treated patients are accounted for in the Treatment-related Serious Adverse Events data table including the two patients with changes in background medications.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYMean Change of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total Score From Baseline to Week 4Baseline to Week 4Two patients were excluded from the analysis due to a change in their background medication.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in the Subscale Score of Disability of the Baseline Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) From Baseline to Week 4Baseline to Week 4Two patients were excluded from the analysis due to a change in their background medication.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in the Subscale Score of Pain of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) From Baseline to Week 4Baseline to Week 4Two patients were excluded from the analysis due to a change in their background medication.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in the Subscale Score of Severity of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) From Baseline to Week 4Baseline to Week 4Two patients were excluded from the analysis due to a change in their background medication.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) From Baseline to Week 4Baseline to Week 4Two patients were excluded from the analysis due to a change in their background medication.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) From Baseline to Week 4Baseline to Week 4Two patients were excluded from the analysis due to a change in their background medication.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Serious Adverse EventsPlacebo0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Serious Adverse EventsABP-450 - 150U0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Serious Adverse EventsABP-450 - 250U0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Serious Adverse EventsABP-450 - 350U0Participants
Mean Change of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total Score From Baseline to Week 4Placebo3.57Standard Error 2.67score on a scale
Mean Change of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total Score From Baseline to Week 4ABP-450 - 150U14.01Standard Error 2.63score on a scale
Mean Change of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total Score From Baseline to Week 4ABP-450 - 250U11.28Standard Error 2.70score on a scale
Mean Change of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total Score From Baseline to Week 4ABP-450 - 350U9.92Standard Error 2.54score on a scale
Mean Change in the Subscale Score of Disability of the Baseline Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) From Baseline to Week 4Placebo1.02Standard Error 1.11score on a scale
Mean Change in the Subscale Score of Disability of the Baseline Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) From Baseline to Week 4ABP-450 - 150U4.53Standard Error 1.09score on a scale

Participant flow32

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo15
Overall StudySTARTEDABP-450 - 150U15
Overall StudySTARTEDABP-450 - 250U16
Overall StudySTARTEDABP-450 - 350U15
Overall StudyRandomized But Not DosedPlacebo1
Overall StudyRandomized But Not DosedABP-450 - 150U1
Overall StudyRandomized But Not DosedABP-450 - 250U0
Overall StudyRandomized But Not DosedABP-450 - 350U0
Overall StudyTreatedPlacebo14
Overall StudyTreatedABP-450 - 150U14

Adverse events88

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDysphagiaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo014
otherDysphagiaGastrointestinal disordersABP-450 - 150U014
otherDysphagiaGastrointestinal disordersABP-450 - 250U216
otherDysphagiaGastrointestinal disordersABP-450 - 350U315
otherMuscular WeaknessGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo014
otherMuscular WeaknessGastrointestinal disordersABP-450 - 150U214
otherMuscular WeaknessGastrointestinal disordersABP-450 - 250U116
otherMuscular WeaknessGastrointestinal disordersABP-450 - 350U115
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo114
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersABP-450 - 150U214

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo014
Total, all-cause mortalityABP-450 - 150U014
Total, all-cause mortalityABP-450 - 250U016
Total, all-cause mortalityABP-450 - 350U015
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo914
Total, other adverse eventsABP-450 - 150U814
Total, other adverse eventsABP-450 - 250U1216
Total, other adverse eventsABP-450 - 350U1115
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo014
Total, serious adverse eventsABP-450 - 150U014

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04849988

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04849988/results?page=2