ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04852679

Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel® in Chinese Participants With GEP-NETs

NCT04852679, Phase 3, Completed, Ipsen; results first posted 2024-10-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel® in Chinese Participants With GEP-NETs. Trials, record NCT04852679. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04852679

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel® in Chinese Participants With GEP-NETs
NCT number
NCT04852679
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
43 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Ipsen
Conditions
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
Interventions
Lanreotide autogel
First posted
2021-04-21
Last updated
2024-10-01
Results first posted
2024-10-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) of Tumour Response Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) at Week 24RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24
The CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of confirmed complete response (CR), confirmed partial response (PR), or continued stable disease (SD) until the time of assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria v1.1. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. The SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started.
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS) by BICR Within Weeks 24 and 48RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48
The PFS was defined as the time from the first administration of study intervention to the date of the first documented PD measured using RECIST criteria v1.1 and confirmed by BICR, or death from any cause, whichever comes first. The PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PD was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS) at the End of the Main Intervention PeriodRECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Week 48 (end of the main intervention period)The OS was defined as the time from the first administration of study intervention to the date of death from any cause. The OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryTime to Progression (TTP) During Main Intervention PeriodRECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
The TTP was defined as the time from the first administration of study intervention to the date of the first documented PD, or clinical progression confirmed by the investigator. The TTP was assessed by BICR and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PD was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Alive and Without Tumour Progressive at Weeks 24 and 48RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48
Percentage of participants who were alive and progression free per RECIST v1.1 using BICR assessments at 24 and 48 weeks after first dose of study intervention were reported. The PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PD was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
SecondaryClinical Benefit Rate Assessed by BICR at Week 48RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Week 48
The CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of confirmed CR, confirmed PR, or continued SD until the time of assessment according to RECIST criteria v1.1. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. The SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started.
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR) at Weeks 24 and 48RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48
The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of confirmed CR or confirmed PR. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter.
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 24 and 48RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48
The DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of confirmed CR, confirmed PR or SD. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. The SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Neuroendocrine Tumours (NET)-Related Clinical Symptoms at Weeks 24 and 48Weeks 24 and 48
The presence or absence of endocrine symptoms of NETs (example; flushing, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, weakness, heartburn, nausea, vomiting, sweating, tremor, palpitation, or erythema) were assessed by the investigator at screening. In participants with symptoms of NETs at screening, a baseline assessment of the symptoms experienced in the last 4 weeks was performed by questioning before study intervention administration at Day 1. These symptoms were recorded in the case report form and severity graded upon National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Where, Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, Grade 4= life-threatening and Grade 5= death.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Plasma Chromogranin A (CgA) at Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48Baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48The CgA determination was useful for staging, prognosis and follow up, since the serum concentration correlated to the tumour mass. Blood samples were collected to measure circulating CgA.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) of Tumour Response Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) at Week 24RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24The ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProgression Free Survival (PFS) by BICR Within Weeks 24 and 48RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48The ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.weeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS) at the End of the Main Intervention PeriodRECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Week 48 (end of the main intervention period)The ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.weeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Progression (TTP) During Main Intervention PeriodRECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48The ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.weeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Alive and Without Tumour Progressive at Weeks 24 and 48RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48The ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYClinical Benefit Rate Assessed by BICR at Week 48RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Week 48The ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Response Rate (ORR) at Weeks 24 and 48RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48The ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDisease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 24 and 48RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48The ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Neuroendocrine Tumours (NET)-Related Clinical Symptoms at Weeks 24 and 48Weeks 24 and 48The ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Plasma Chromogranin A (CgA) at Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48Baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48The ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.microgram per literMEAN

Results by group60

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) of Tumour Response Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) at Week 24Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg62.7995% Confidence Interval 46.7 to 77.0percentage of participants
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by BICR Within Weeks 24 and 48Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgWeek 24NA95% Confidence Interval 24.1 to NAweeks
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by BICR Within Weeks 24 and 48Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgWeek 48NA95% Confidence Interval 36.1 to NAweeks
Overall Survival (OS) at the End of the Main Intervention PeriodLanreotide Autogel 120 mgNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAweeks
Time to Progression (TTP) During Main Intervention PeriodLanreotide Autogel 120 mgNA95% Confidence Interval 48.0 to NAweeks
Percentage of Participants Alive and Without Tumour Progressive at Weeks 24 and 48Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgWeek 2477.495% Confidence Interval 59.6 to 88.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Alive and Without Tumour Progressive at Weeks 24 and 48Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgWeek 4859.095% Confidence Interval 36.1 to 76.1percentage of participants
Clinical Benefit Rate Assessed by BICR at Week 48Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg58.195% Confidence Interval 42.1 to 73.0percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR) at Weeks 24 and 48Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgWeek 24095% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 8.2percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR) at Weeks 24 and 48Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgWeek 487.095% Confidence Interval 1.5 to 19.1percentage of participants

Participant flow7

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Main Intervention PeriodSTARTEDLanreotide Autogel 120 Milligram (mg)43
Main Intervention PeriodStudy Intervention Completion at Week 24Lanreotide Autogel 120 Milligram (mg)28
Main Intervention PeriodCOMPLETEDLanreotide Autogel 120 Milligram (mg)22
Main Intervention PeriodNOT COMPLETEDLanreotide Autogel 120 Milligram (mg)21
Independent Injection PeriodSTARTEDLanreotide Autogel 120 Milligram (mg)5
Independent Injection PeriodCOMPLETEDLanreotide Autogel 120 Milligram (mg)4
Independent Injection PeriodNOT COMPLETEDLanreotide Autogel 120 Milligram (mg)1

Adverse events70

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAlanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsMain Intervention Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg94310
otherAlanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsIndependent Injection Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg050
otherBilirubin conjugated increasedInvestigationsMain Intervention Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg8438
otherBilirubin conjugated increasedInvestigationsIndependent Injection Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg050
otherBlood bilirubin increasedInvestigationsMain Intervention Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg8439
otherBlood bilirubin increasedInvestigationsIndependent Injection Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg050
otherWeight decreasedInvestigationsMain Intervention Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg84310
otherWeight decreasedInvestigationsIndependent Injection Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg050
otherBlood glucose increasedInvestigationsMain Intervention Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg7437
otherBlood glucose increasedInvestigationsIndependent Injection Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg050

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMain Intervention Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg243
Total, all-cause mortalityIndependent Injection Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg05
Total, other adverse eventsMain Intervention Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg4343
Total, other adverse eventsIndependent Injection Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg25
Total, serious adverse eventsMain Intervention Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg443
Total, serious adverse eventsIndependent Injection Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg05

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Main Intervention Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg vs Independent Injection Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Main Intervention Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg vs Independent Injection Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04852679

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04852679/results?page=2