ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04921345

Registered outcomes29

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNemolizumab Serum ConcentrationsAt Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
PrimaryApparent Total Body Clearance (Cl/F) of NemolizumabPre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52CL/F is apparent clearance of the drug from the serum, calculated as the drug dose divided area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time \[AUC (0-inf)\]. Individual nemolizumab.
PrimaryApparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of NemolizumabPre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52Vd/F was calculated as dose divided by lambda\_z \*AUC(0-inf).
PrimaryAbsorption Rate Constant (Ka) of NemolizumabPre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
PrimarySerum Concentration Observed Immediately Before Next Dosing (Ctrough) of NemolizumabPre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
PrimaryArea Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) of NemolizumabPre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
PrimaryApparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of NemolizumabPre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 32 and 52
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs), Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline through Week 52
AE defined as any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participant administered a medicinal product which does not necessarily have causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs defined as AEs occurring after first administration of study drug during the study. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence, in view of either Investigator or Sponsor, that resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was congenital anomaly/birth defect or was important medical event. AESI was noteworthy TEAE for study drug that was to be monitored closely and reported promptly. Relatedness to study drug was based on Investigator's discretion. AEs Leading to study treatment withdrawal and AEs Leading to study withdrawal will also be reported.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Each Visit up to Week 52Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity was assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. The EASI score ranged from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis.
SecondaryAbsolute Change From Baseline in EASI ScoreBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity was assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. The EASI score ranged from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving 50 Percent (%), 75% or 90% Response From Baseline in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90)Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity was assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. The EASI score ranged from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis. EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90 responders will be the participants who achieved greater than or equal to (\>=) 50%, \>=75% and \>=90% overall improvement in EASI score respectively from baseline to Week 52.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success RateBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
IGA is a 5-point scale used by the investigator or trained designee to evaluate the global severity of AD. The Investigator reviewed the participant's skin and give a score of 0 (Clear), 1 (Almost clear), 2 (Mild), 3 (Moderate), or 4 (Severe). Here, higher score indicates severe outcome. Success was defined as an IGA of 0 \[Clear\] or 1 \[Almost clear\] and a \>=2-points improvement from baseline. Number of participants with IGA success rate was reported for this outcome measure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement by Atopic Dermatitis (AD)Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck \[9%\], anterior trunk \[18%\], back \[18%\], upper limbs \[18%\], lower limbs \[36%\], and genitals \[1%\]) and reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. The reported percentage of BSA was combined percentage of all major body sections.
SecondaryAbsolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Pruritus NRS is a scale that will be used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRS ScoreBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average of PP NRSBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
SecondaryAbsolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS ScoreBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Average Pruritus NRS ScoreBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
SecondaryAbsolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS ScoreBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants were asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night? On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Sleep Disturbance NRS ScoreBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants were asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night? On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04921345/registered