ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04983589

A Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy in Participants Age 40 to 55 With Presbyopia (Old Eye) Who Receive AGN-190584 in Both Eyes Twice Daily

NCT04983589, Phase 3, Completed, Allergan; results first posted 2023-03-21

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy in Participants Age 40 to 55 With Presbyopia (Old Eye) Who Receive AGN-190584 in Both Eyes Twice Daily. Trials, record NCT04983589. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04983589

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy in Participants Age 40 to 55 With Presbyopia (Old Eye) Who Receive AGN-190584 in Both Eyes Twice Daily
NCT number
NCT04983589
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
230 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Conditions
Presbyopia
Interventions
Pilocarpine HCl, Vehicle
First posted
2021-07-30
Last updated
2023-03-21
Results first posted
2023-03-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-Contrast, Binocular Distance-Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) With No More Than 5-Letter Loss in Mesopic Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) With the Same Refractive Correction
3 hours after second dose on Day 14
Visual acuity for near (40 centimeter \[cm\]) and distance (4 meter \[m\]) targets were measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart. High contrast corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was assessed binocularly (in each eye) using the provided visual acuity charts for distance vision in a room with mesopic lighting conditions (10 to 11 lux) measured at the target. Both near vision and distance vision were measured to evaluate the effect of AGN-190584. A participant who gained 3 lines or more in mesopic, high contrast, binocular DCNVA with no more than 5-letter loss in mesopic CDVA with the same refractive correction was regarded as a responder. A participant with missing data was regarded as a non-responder.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Photopic, High-Contrast, Binocular DCNVA With No More Than a 5-Letter Loss in Photopic CDVA With the Same Refractive Correction3 hours after second dose on Day 14
Visual acuity for near (40 centimeter \[cm\]) and distance (4 meter \[m\]) targets were measured in photopic conditions using an eye chart. High contrast corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was assessed binocularly (in each eye) using the provided visual acuity charts for distance vision in a room with photopic lighting conditions (≥ 251 lux) measured at the target. Both near vision and distance vision were measured to evaluate the effect of AGN-190584. A participant who gained 3 lines or more in photopic, high contrast, binocular DCNVA with no more than 5-letter loss in photopic CDVA with the same refractive correction was regarded as a responder. A participant with missing data was regarded as a non-responder.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Gaining 2 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-Contrast, Binocular DCNVA With No More Than a 5-Letter Loss in Mesopic CDVA With the Same Refractive Correction3 hours after second dose on Day 14
Visual acuity for near (40 centimeter \[cm\]) and distance (4 meter \[m\]) targets were measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart. High contrast corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was assessed binocularly (in each eye) using the provided visual acuity charts for distance vision in a room with photopic lighting conditions (10 to 11 lux) measured at the target. Both near vision and distance vision were measured to evaluate the effect of AGN-190584. A participant who gained 2 lines or more in mesopic, high contrast, binocular DCNVA with no more than 5-letter loss in mesopic CDVA with the same refractive correction was regarded as a responder at that visit/timepoint. A participant with missing data was regarded as a non-responder.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving 20/40 or Better in Mesopic, High-Contrast, Binocular DCNVA With No More Than a 5-Letter Loss in Mesopic CDVA With the Same Refractive Correction3 hours after second dose on Day 14
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) target was measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart. Both near vision and distance vision were measured to evaluate the effect of AGN-190584. A participant who achieved 20/40 or better in mesopic, high contrast, binocular DCNVA with no more than 5-letter loss in mesopic CDVA with the same refractive correction was regarded as a responder at that visit/timepoint. A participant with missing data was regarded as a non-responder.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-Contrast, Binocular Distance-Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) With No More Than 5-Letter Loss in Mesopic Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) With the Same Refractive Correction
3 hours after second dose on Day 14ITT Population included all randomized participants. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at single decimal.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Photopic, High-Contrast, Binocular DCNVA With No More Than a 5-Letter Loss in Photopic CDVA With the Same Refractive Correction3 hours after second dose on Day 14ITT Population included all randomized participants. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at single decimal.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Gaining 2 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-Contrast, Binocular DCNVA With No More Than a 5-Letter Loss in Mesopic CDVA With the Same Refractive Correction3 hours after second dose on Day 14ITT Population included all randomized participants. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at single decimal.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving 20/40 or Better in Mesopic, High-Contrast, Binocular DCNVA With No More Than a 5-Letter Loss in Mesopic CDVA With the Same Refractive Correction3 hours after second dose on Day 14ITT Population included all randomized participants. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at single decimal.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-Contrast, Binocular Distance-Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) With No More Than 5-Letter Loss in Mesopic Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) With the Same Refractive Correction
Vehicle7.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-Contrast, Binocular Distance-Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) With No More Than 5-Letter Loss in Mesopic Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) With the Same Refractive Correction
AGN-19058435.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Photopic, High-Contrast, Binocular DCNVA With No More Than a 5-Letter Loss in Photopic CDVA With the Same Refractive CorrectionVehicle6.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Photopic, High-Contrast, Binocular DCNVA With No More Than a 5-Letter Loss in Photopic CDVA With the Same Refractive CorrectionAGN-19058432.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Gaining 2 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-Contrast, Binocular DCNVA With No More Than a 5-Letter Loss in Mesopic CDVA With the Same Refractive CorrectionVehicle25.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Gaining 2 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-Contrast, Binocular DCNVA With No More Than a 5-Letter Loss in Mesopic CDVA With the Same Refractive CorrectionAGN-19058460.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 20/40 or Better in Mesopic, High-Contrast, Binocular DCNVA With No More Than a 5-Letter Loss in Mesopic CDVA With the Same Refractive CorrectionVehicle24.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving 20/40 or Better in Mesopic, High-Contrast, Binocular DCNVA With No More Than a 5-Letter Loss in Mesopic CDVA With the Same Refractive CorrectionAGN-19058444.7percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDVehicle116
Overall StudySTARTEDAGN-190584114
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVehicle113
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAGN-190584111
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVehicle3
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAGN-1905843

Adverse events4

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherEYE IRRITATIONEye disordersVehicle01160
otherEYE IRRITATIONEye disordersAGN-190584711416
otherHEADACHENervous system disordersVehicle41164
otherHEADACHENervous system disordersAGN-1905841011412

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityVehicle0116
Total, all-cause mortalityAGN-1905840114
Total, other adverse eventsVehicle4116
Total, other adverse eventsAGN-19058416114
Total, serious adverse eventsVehicle0116
Total, serious adverse eventsAGN-1905840114

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
AGN-190584 vs Vehicle: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
AGN-190584 vs Vehicle: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04983589

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04983589/registered