ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04999020

Ravulizumab Versus Placebo in Adult Participants With Dermatomyositis

NCT04999020, Phase 2, Phase 3, Terminated, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; results first posted 2024-12-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Ravulizumab Versus Placebo in Adult Participants With Dermatomyositis. Trials, record NCT04999020. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04999020

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Ravulizumab Versus Placebo in Adult Participants With Dermatomyositis
NCT number
NCT04999020
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
38 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Conditions
Dermatomyositis
Interventions
Ravulizumab, Placebo
First posted
2021-08-10
Last updated
2025-07-09
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2021-001200-15
Results first posted
2024-12-06
Limitations and caveats
Part A did not meet its primary endpoint and the study was terminated.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS-TIS) (TIS40) Response at Week 26 of the Randomized Controlled PeriodWeek 26
Data are presented for the number of participants with a TIS40 response, defined as an IMACS-TIS score ≥ 40 at Week 26. IMACS-TIS is a clinical instrument that encompasses 6 core set measure (CSMs) (physician, patient, extra-muscular global activity, muscle strength, Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\], and muscle enzyme levels). A Total Improvement Score (TIS: 0-100), was determined by summing scores in each CSM, and was based on the improvement and relative weight of each CSM. A higher score indicated greater improvement. TIS40 was considered a moderate improvement score.
SecondaryTIS at Week 26Week 26
TIS scores ranged from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a greater improvement. Scores were determined by summing scores in each of the 6 CSMs of the IMAC (physician, patient, extra-muscular global activity, muscle strength, HAQ, and muscle enzyme levels). Clinically meaningful thresholds for improvement were defined as ≥ 20 point improvement response on IMACS-TIS (TIS20; mild), ≥ 40 point improvement response on IMACS TIS (TIS40; moderate) and ≥ 60 point improvement response on IMACS-TIS (TIS60; severe). Scores were based on the improvement and relative weight of each CSM. Data are presented for TIS (least squares mean) at Week 26.
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area And Severity Index (CDASI) Activity Score at Week 26Baseline, Week 26
The CDASI is an instrument that separately measures activity and damage in the skin of dermatomyositis (DM) participants. It contains 3 activity measures (erythema, scale, and erosion/ulceration) and 2 damage measures (poikiloderma and calcinosis). CDASI score is calculated by rating the severity of skin disease in 15 anatomical locations on the body based on the activity and damage components. CDASI was completed by the Clinician or Clinician-Investigator while examining the participant. Total CDASI scores ranged from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a greater disease severity. Change from baseline in CDASI Total Activity Score at Week 26 was analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM). The MMRM model included the observed Total Activity Score values at post baseline visits (Week 26) as the dependent variable.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Response Related to Muscle Enzymes: Normalization of Most Abnormal Baseline Enzyme at Week 26Baseline, Week 26
Laboratory tests were conducted to measure serum activities of muscle associated enzymes including creatine kinase (CK), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and aldolase. Data are presented for the number of participants who had an abnormal muscle enzyme at baseline that had been normalized at Week 26.
SecondaryChange From Baseline In IMACS CSMs: Extra-Muscular Disease Activity Based on Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) at Week 26Baseline, Week 26
The MDAAT assesses disease activity of extra-muscular organ systems and muscles in participants with DM. The validated MDAAT tool measures the degree of disease activity of extra-muscular organ systems and muscle on a 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS). Extra-muscular activity ranged between 0 and 10, where, 0 cm = absent and 10 cm = maximum disease activity.
SecondaryChange From Baseline In IMACS CSMs: Physician Global Activity Assessment at Week 26Baseline, Week 26
The physician global activity assessment provides an overall rating of disease activity related to myositis. Disease activity is judged by the physician based on all information available at the time of evaluation, including the participant's appearance, medical history, physical examination, laboratory testing, and prescribed medical therapy. The global disease activity score is recorded on a 10-cm VAS, where 0 cm= no evidence of disease activity and 10 cm= extremely severe disease activity.
SecondaryChange From Baseline In IMACS CSMs: Patient Global Activity Assessment at Week 26Baseline, Week 26
The patient global activity assessment provides an overall rating of disease activity related to myositis from the participant's perspective. Participants were asked to consider all of the active inflammation in their own muscles, skin, joints, intestines, heart, lungs, or other parts of the body that can improve with treatment. The patient global disease activity score was recorded on a 10-cm VAS that contained a smiley face at the 0-cm anchor and a sad face at the 10 cm anchor to help participants understand the scale. Scores ranged from 0 (no evidence of disease activity) to 10 (extremely active or severe disease activity).
SecondaryChange From Baseline In IMACS CSMs: Manual Muscle Testing Subset 8 Muscles (MMT-8) at Week 26Baseline, Week 26
The purpose of the MMT-8 was to measure muscle strength as part of the physical examination. It included a subset of 8 muscle groups: neck flexors, deltoids, biceps, wrist, extensors, gluteus maximus and medius, quadriceps, and ankle dorsiflexors. Total MMT8 scores ranged from 0 (lowest strength) to 150 (highest strength).
SecondaryChange From Baseline In IMACS CSMs: Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at Week 26Baseline, Week 26
The HAQ is a brief self-report questionnaire that assesses physical function pertaining to activities of daily living in a variety of domains. The HAQ includes 20 questions relating to 8 domains of function: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and usual activities. For each of the categories, participants reported the amount of difficulty they had in performing 2 or 3 specific subcategory items. The standard disability score is calculated from the 8 categories by dividing the sum of the individual categories by the number of categories answered, yielding a score from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), with higher values indicating higher disability.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With CDASI Response (>=7-point Improvement) at Week 26Week 26
The CDASI is an instrument that separately measures activity and damage in the skin of dermatomyositis (DM) participants. It contains 3 activity measures (erythema, scale, and erosion/ulceration) and 2 damage measures (poikiloderma and calcinosis). CDASI score is calculated by rating the severity of skin disease in 15 anatomical locations on the body based on the activity and damage components. CDASI was completed by the Clinician or Clinician-Investigator while examining the participant. Total CDASI scores ranged from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a greater disease severity. Data are presented for the number of participants with a CDASI response. Response was defined as a \>=7 point improvement in participants who did not have an intercurrent event at or prior to the relevant timepoint.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS-TIS) (TIS40) Response at Week 26 of the Randomized Controlled PeriodWeek 26Randomized Set, which included all randomized participants grouped by randomized treatment group.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYTIS at Week 26Week 26Randomized Set, which included all randomized participants grouped by randomized treatment group. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data for the outcome measure.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area And Severity Index (CDASI) Activity Score at Week 26Baseline, Week 26Randomized Set, which included all randomized participants grouped by randomized treatment group. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data for the outcome measure.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Response Related to Muscle Enzymes: Normalization of Most Abnormal Baseline Enzyme at Week 26Baseline, Week 26Randomized Set, which included all randomized participants grouped by randomized treatment group.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In IMACS CSMs: Extra-Muscular Disease Activity Based on Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) at Week 26Baseline, Week 26Randomized Set, which included all randomized participants grouped by randomized treatment group. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data for the outcome measure.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In IMACS CSMs: Physician Global Activity Assessment at Week 26Baseline, Week 26Randomized Set, which included all randomized participants grouped by randomized treatment group. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data for the outcome measure.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In IMACS CSMs: Patient Global Activity Assessment at Week 26Baseline, Week 26Randomized Set, which included all randomized participants grouped by randomized treatment group. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data for the outcome measure.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In IMACS CSMs: Manual Muscle Testing Subset 8 Muscles (MMT-8) at Week 26Baseline, Week 26Randomized Set, which included all randomized participants grouped by randomized treatment group. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data for the outcome measure.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In IMACS CSMs: Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at Week 26Baseline, Week 26Randomized Set, which included all randomized participants grouped by randomized treatment group. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with evaluable data for the outcome measure.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With CDASI Response (>=7-point Improvement) at Week 26Week 26Randomized Set, which included all randomized participants grouped by randomized treatment group.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group36

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS-TIS) (TIS40) Response at Week 26 of the Randomized Controlled PeriodRCP: Ravulizumab9Participants
Number of Participants With International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS-TIS) (TIS40) Response at Week 26 of the Randomized Controlled PeriodRCP: Placebo6Participants
TIS at Week 26RCP: Ravulizumab31.16Standard Error 4.185scores on a scale
TIS at Week 26RCP: Placebo43.28Standard Error 6.650scores on a scale
Change From Baseline In Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area And Severity Index (CDASI) Activity Score at Week 26RCP: Ravulizumab-3.80Standard Error 1.249scores on a scale
Change From Baseline In Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area And Severity Index (CDASI) Activity Score at Week 26RCP: Placebo-7.47Standard Error 2.021scores on a scale
Number of Participants With Response Related to Muscle Enzymes: Normalization of Most Abnormal Baseline Enzyme at Week 26RCP: Ravulizumab4Participants
Number of Participants With Response Related to Muscle Enzymes: Normalization of Most Abnormal Baseline Enzyme at Week 26RCP: Placebo1Participants
Change From Baseline In IMACS CSMs: Extra-Muscular Disease Activity Based on Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) at Week 26RCP: Ravulizumab-0.92Standard Error 0.383scores on a scale
Change From Baseline In IMACS CSMs: Extra-Muscular Disease Activity Based on Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) at Week 26RCP: Placebo-2.13Standard Error 0.614scores on a scale

Participant flow32

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Randomized Controlled Period (RCP)STARTEDRCP: Ravulizumab26
Randomized Controlled Period (RCP)STARTEDRCP: Placebo12
Randomized Controlled Period (RCP)STARTEDOLE: Ravulizumab to Ravulizumab0
Randomized Controlled Period (RCP)STARTEDOLE: Placebo to Ravulizumab0
Randomized Controlled Period (RCP)Received at Least 1 Dose of TreatmentRCP: Ravulizumab26
Randomized Controlled Period (RCP)Received at Least 1 Dose of TreatmentRCP: Placebo12
Randomized Controlled Period (RCP)Received at Least 1 Dose of TreatmentOLE: Ravulizumab to Ravulizumab0
Randomized Controlled Period (RCP)Received at Least 1 Dose of TreatmentOLE: Placebo to Ravulizumab0
Randomized Controlled Period (RCP)COMPLETEDRCP: Ravulizumab22
Randomized Controlled Period (RCP)COMPLETEDRCP: Placebo9

Adverse events256

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRCP: Ravulizumab025
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRCP: Placebo213
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOLE: Ravulizumab to Ravulizumab022
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOLE: Placebo to Ravulizumab09
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersRCP: Ravulizumab025
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersRCP: Placebo113
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersOLE: Ravulizumab to Ravulizumab022
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersOLE: Placebo to Ravulizumab09
otherCushingoidEndocrine disordersRCP: Ravulizumab025
otherCushingoidEndocrine disordersRCP: Placebo113

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRCP: Ravulizumab025
Total, all-cause mortalityRCP: Placebo013
Total, all-cause mortalityOLE: Ravulizumab to Ravulizumab022
Total, all-cause mortalityOLE: Placebo to Ravulizumab09
Total, other adverse eventsRCP: Ravulizumab925
Total, other adverse eventsRCP: Placebo1013
Total, other adverse eventsOLE: Ravulizumab to Ravulizumab1122
Total, other adverse eventsOLE: Placebo to Ravulizumab79
Total, serious adverse eventsRCP: Ravulizumab225
Total, serious adverse eventsRCP: Placebo013

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons8

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
RCP: Ravulizumab vs RCP: Placebo: Number of Participants With CDASI Response (>=7-point Improvement) at Week 26Trial comparisons
RCP: Ravulizumab vs RCP: Placebo: Number of Participants With Clinical Worsening (CW) During the RCP At 2 Consecutive VisitsTrial comparisons
RCP: Ravulizumab vs RCP: Placebo: Number of Participants With ≥ 20-Point Improvement Response on IMACS-TIS (TIS20) Response at Week 26Trial comparisons
RCP: Ravulizumab vs RCP: Placebo: Number of Participants With Response Related to Muscle Enzymes: Normalization of Most Abnormal Baseline Enzyme at Week 26Trial comparisons
RCP: Ravulizumab vs RCP: Placebo: Number of Participants With ≥ 60-Point Improvement Response on IMACS-TIS (TIS60) Response at Week 26Trial comparisons
RCP: Ravulizumab vs RCP: Placebo: Number of Participants With International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS-TIS) (TIS40) Response at Week 26 of the Randomized Controlled Period
Trial comparisons
RCP: Ravulizumab vs RCP: Placebo: Number of Participants Who Received Acute Rescue Therapy With Standard DM TreatmentTrial comparisons
RCP: Ravulizumab vs RCP: Placebo: Number of Participants With Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Activity Physician's Global Assessment (CDA-IGA) Response at Week 26Trial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04999020

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04999020/results?page=2