ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05014672

A Trial of Setanaxib in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) and Liver Stiffness

NCT05014672, Phase 2, Completed, Calliditas Therapeutics Suisse SA; results first posted 2025-04-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Trial of Setanaxib in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) and Liver Stiffness. Trials, record NCT05014672. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05014672

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Trial of Setanaxib in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) and Liver Stiffness
NCT number
NCT05014672
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
76 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Calliditas Therapeutics Suisse SA
Conditions
Primary Biliary Cholangitis, Liver Stiffness
Interventions
Setanaxib, Placebo
First posted
2021-08-20
Last updated
2025-04-24
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2021-001810-13
Results first posted
2025-04-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in ALP at Week 24 Compared to BaselineBaseline (Day 1) and Week 24Change in ALP at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, ratio of week 24 value to baseline value.
SecondaryChange in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PROMIS Short Form-Fatigue 7b DailyBaseline (Day 1) and Week 24
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 7b measures the severity of fatigue since waking. There are 7 questions, each scored between 1 and 5, with a total score between 7 to 35. A higher score indicates worse fatigue. This raw score is converted to a T score (a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a SD of 10).
SecondaryChange in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) FatigueBaseline (Day 1) and Week 24
The Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)-Fatigue is a global index where subjects are asked to rate the severity of fatigue on a 5-point scale within the past 7 days, with choices of 1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe and 5=Very Severe. Higher scores indicate a worse assessment for fatigue.
SecondaryChange in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) FatigueWeek 24
The Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)-Fatigue is a 7-point scale reflecting a subject's rating of overall improvement where subjects are asked to rate their overall improvement with fatigue with 1=Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Worse, 6=Much worse, 7=Very much worse. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome for change in fatigue.
SecondaryChange in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PBC-40 Questionnaire (PBC 40) Fatigue DomainBaseline (Day 1) and Week 24
PBC-40 fatigue domain includes 11 item questions, items scores range from 1 to 5. The individual item scores are summed to obtain a total domain score (Range for fatigue domain: 11 to 55), high scores represent high impact and low scores indicate low impact of PBC on the quality of life.
SecondaryChange in Liver Stiffness at Week 24 Compared to ScreeningScreening (Day -28) and Week 24Change in liver stiffness at Week 24 compared to Screening, as assessed by transient elastography (FibroScan®)
SecondaryChange in Pruritus at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS)Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
WI-NRS is a daily patient-reported measure of itch intensity using an 11-point scale where 0=no itch and 10=worst itching imaginable. The WI-NRS score is calculated by averaging the daily WI-NRS scores before the visit date (inclusive). Higher scores indicate worse functioning for pruritus on the WI-NRS.
SecondaryChange in Pruritus at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PBC-40 Itch DomainBaseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Pruritus was assessed by answering 3 questions on the PBC-40 Itch domain from 1 to 5, which was also summed to obtain a total domain score (range 3 to 15). A high score represents a high impact, and a low score indicates low impact of pruritus on the quality of life.
SecondaryChange in Pruritus at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PGIS PruritusBaseline (Day 1) and Week 24
PGIS-Pruritus is a global index where subjects are asked to rate the severity of pruritus on a 5-point scale within the past 7 days, with choices of 1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe and 5=Very Severe. Higher scores indicate a worse assessment for pruritus.
SecondaryChange in Pruritus at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PGIC PruritusWeek 24
The PGIC-Pruritus is a 7-point scale reflecting a subject's rating of overall improvement where subjects are asked to rate their overall improvement with fatigue with 1=Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Worse, 6=Much worse, 7=Very much worse. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome for change in pruritus.

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in ALP at Week 24 Compared to BaselineBaseline (Day 1) and Week 24Full Analysis SetratioGEOMETRIC_LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PROMIS Short Form-Fatigue 7b DailyBaseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Full Analysis Set. This questionnaire was introduced after protocol version 1.0, so patients enrolled under protocol version 1.0 do not have a baseline value and are excluded from the number of participants analyzed.
T-scoresLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) FatigueBaseline (Day 1) and Week 24Full Analysis Set subjects who have both non-missing baseline and Week 24 resultsunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) FatigueWeek 24Full Analysis Setunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PBC-40 Questionnaire (PBC 40) Fatigue DomainBaseline (Day 1) and Week 24Full Analysis Setunits on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Liver Stiffness at Week 24 Compared to ScreeningScreening (Day -28) and Week 24Full Analysis SetratioGEOMETRIC_LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Pruritus at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS)Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24Full Analysis Set subjects who have both non-missing baseline and Week 24 resultsunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Pruritus at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PBC-40 Itch DomainBaseline (Day 1) and Week 24Full Analysis Set subjects who have both non-missing baseline and Week 24 resultsunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Pruritus at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PGIS PruritusBaseline (Day 1) and Week 24Full Analysis Set subjects who have both non-missing baseline and Week 24 resultsunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Pruritus at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PGIC PruritusWeek 24Full Analysis Setunits on a scaleMEAN

Results by group59

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in ALP at Week 24 Compared to BaselineSetanaxib 1200 mg/Day0.8995% Confidence Interval 0.802 to 0.988ratio
Change in ALP at Week 24 Compared to BaselineSetanaxib 1600 mg/Day0.8495% Confidence Interval 0.758 to 0.931ratio
Change in ALP at Week 24 Compared to BaselinePlacebo1.0395% Confidence Interval 0.936 to 1.141ratio
Change in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PROMIS Short Form-Fatigue 7b DailySetanaxib 1200 mg/Day-3.6095% Confidence Interval -7.625 to 0.429T-scores
Change in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PROMIS Short Form-Fatigue 7b DailySetanaxib 1600 mg/Day-0.8095% Confidence Interval -4.679 to 3.072T-scores
Change in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the PROMIS Short Form-Fatigue 7b DailyPlacebo-1.4395% Confidence Interval -5.331 to 2.461T-scores
Change in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) FatigueSetanaxib 1200 mg/Day-0.07Standard Deviation 0.730units on a scale
Change in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) FatigueSetanaxib 1600 mg/Day0.12Standard Deviation 0.857units on a scale
Change in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) FatiguePlacebo0.22Standard Deviation 1.003units on a scale
Change in Fatigue at Week 24 Compared to Baseline, as Assessed by the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) FatigueSetanaxib 1200 mg/Day3.27Standard Deviation 1.534units on a scale

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSetanaxib 1200 mg/Day24
Overall StudySTARTEDSetanaxib 1600 mg/Day25
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo27
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSetanaxib 1200 mg/Day17
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSetanaxib 1600 mg/Day20
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo23
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSetanaxib 1200 mg/Day7
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSetanaxib 1600 mg/Day5
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo4

Adverse events96

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsSetanaxib 1200 mg/Day325
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsSetanaxib 1600 mg/Day425
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo026
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsSetanaxib 1200 mg/Day325
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsSetanaxib 1600 mg/Day325
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsPlacebo026
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsSetanaxib 1200 mg/Day025
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsSetanaxib 1600 mg/Day225
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsPlacebo026
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsSetanaxib 1200 mg/Day025

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySetanaxib 1200 mg/Day025
Total, all-cause mortalitySetanaxib 1600 mg/Day025
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo026
Total, other adverse eventsSetanaxib 1200 mg/Day1425
Total, other adverse eventsSetanaxib 1600 mg/Day1825
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1726
Total, serious adverse eventsSetanaxib 1200 mg/Day425
Total, serious adverse eventsSetanaxib 1600 mg/Day225
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo326

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05014672

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05014672/results?page=2