ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT05030129

ERG/5-HTP in Fragile X Syndrome (FXS)

NCT05030129, Phase 2, Completed, Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; results first posted 2024-09-19

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. ERG/5-HTP in Fragile X Syndrome (FXS). Trials, record NCT05030129. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05030129

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
ERG/5-HTP in Fragile X Syndrome (FXS)
NCT number
NCT05030129
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
15 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Elizabeth Berry-Kravis
Conditions
Fragile X Syndrome
Interventions
5-Hydroxytryptophan, Ergoloid Mesylates, Matching placebo for Ergoloid mesylates, Matching placebo for 5-Hydroxytryptophan
First posted
2021-09-01
Last updated
2024-09-19
Results first posted
2024-09-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimarySafety and Tolerability - Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsBaseline through Week 17
Adverse Events (AEs), including clinically meaningful laboratory abnormalities and significant behavioral changes will be recorded from the time of the subject's first dose of study drug to the end of the study (Week 17) or longer if needed. Adverse events will be assessed at each visit as well as during each phone call and will be tabulated for each treatment period.
PrimarySafety and Tolerability - Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsBaseline through Week 17
Adverse Events (AEs), including clinically meaningful laboratory abnormalities and significant behavioral changes will be tabulated for each treatment period. The Investigator is responsible for assessing the severity (intensity) of each adverse event as mild, moderate, or severe according to the following definitions: Mild - An event that is easily tolerated and generally not interfering with normal daily activities. Moderate - An event that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal daily activities. Severe - An event that is incapacitating with inability to work or perform normal daily activities.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in KiTAP Executive Battery - Alertness Subscore (Reaction Time)Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)
The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The alertness subtest requires subjects to tap a button every time a stimulus appears on the screen. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean reaction time was measured over 90 seconds and change from baseline was calculated. A lower reaction time (net decrease in reaction time) indicates better performance.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Number of Correct Responses on KiTAP Executive Battery Distractibility SubtestBaseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)
The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The distractibility subtest measures how easily the subject is distracted by extraneous stimuli. This subtest requires subjects to tap a button when a target stimulus appears on the screen while ignoring distracters that appear shortly before the stimulus. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded, and change from baseline was calculated. For the distractability subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and lower mean number of errors over the 3 minutes indicates better performance.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Number of Errors on KiTAP Executive Battery Distractibility SubtestBaseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)
The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The distractibility subtest measures how easily the subject is distracted by extraneous stimuli. This subtest requires subjects to tap a button when a target stimulus appears on the screen while ignoring distracters that appear shortly before the stimulus. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded, and change from baseline was calculated. For the distractability subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and lower mean number of errors over the 3 minutes indicates better performance.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Number of Correct Responses on KiTAP Executive Battery Flexibility SubtestBaseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)
The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The flexibility subtest measures the subject's ability to be flexible about shifting from one response type to another. This subtest is 2 minutes long and requires subjects to alternate between identifying blue and green dragons which seem on random sides of the screen by tapping one of two buttons. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded and change from baseline was calculated. For the flexibility subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and lower mean number of errors indicates better performance.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Number of Errors on KiTAP Executive Battery Flexibility SubtestBaseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)
The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The flexibility subtest measures the subject's ability to be flexible about shifting from one response type to another. This subtest is 2 minutes long and requires subjects to alternate between identifying blue and green dragons which seem on random sides of the screen by tapping one of two buttons. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded and change from baseline was calculated. For the flexibility subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and lower mean number of errors indicates better performance.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Number of Correct Responses on KiTAP Test of Attentional Performance Go-NoGo SubtestBaseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)
The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The Go-NoGo subtest measures a subject's impulsivity by requiring subjects to tap a button when the target stimulus is presented, while refraining from hitting the button for the non-target stimulus. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). This subtest takes place over 2 minutes 30 seconds. Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded, and change from baseline was calculated. For the Go-NoGo subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and a lower mean number of errors indicates better performance.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Number of Errors on KiTAP Test of Attentional Performance Go-NoGo SubtestBaseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)
The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The Go-NoGo subtest measures a subject's impulsivity by requiring subjects to tap a button when the target stimulus is presented, while refraining from hitting the button for the non-target stimulus. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). This subtest takes place over 2 minutes 30 seconds. Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded, and change from baseline was calculated. For the Go-NoGo subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and a lower mean number of errors indicates better performance.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale Overall ScoreBaseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)
The Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) is a global measure to provide a clinical judgment of a participant's overall condition based on a trained clinician's assessment of cognition, behavior and activities of daily living. The clinician compares the subject with individuals of the same age and sex. The assessment of severity is with a 7-point scale: 1, not ill; 2, very mild; 3, mild; 4, moderate; 5, marked; 6, severe; 7, extremely severe. A net decrease in severity score over time indicates a positive outcome.

Outcomes18

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYSafety and Tolerability - Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsBaseline through Week 17The Safety population will include all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.Number of Adverse EventsNUMBER
PRIMARYSafety and Tolerability - Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsBaseline through Week 17The Safety population will include all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.Number of Adverse EventsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in KiTAP Executive Battery - Alertness Subscore (Reaction Time)Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit.millisecondsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Number of Correct Responses on KiTAP Executive Battery Distractibility SubtestBaseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which includes all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit.Correct ResponsesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Number of Errors on KiTAP Executive Battery Distractibility SubtestBaseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which includes all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit.ErrorsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Number of Correct Responses on KiTAP Executive Battery Flexibility SubtestBaseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit.Correct ResponsesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Number of Errors on KiTAP Executive Battery Flexibility SubtestBaseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit.ErrorsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Number of Correct Responses on KiTAP Test of Attentional Performance Go-NoGo SubtestBaseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)
The primary efficacy population will be the intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit.
Correct ResponsesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Number of Errors on KiTAP Test of Attentional Performance Go-NoGo SubtestBaseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)
The primary efficacy population will be the intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit.
ErrorsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale Overall ScoreBaseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment)Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit.scores on a scaleMEAN

Results by group164

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Safety and Tolerability - Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsErgoloid Mesylates (EM)2Number of Adverse Events
Safety and Tolerability - Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsErgoloid Mesylates (EM) and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)1Number of Adverse Events
Safety and Tolerability - Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)1Number of Adverse Events
Safety and Tolerability - Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPlacebo3Number of Adverse Events
Safety and Tolerability - Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsErgoloid Mesylates (EM)Mild2Number of Adverse Events
Safety and Tolerability - Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsErgoloid Mesylates (EM) and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)Mild1Number of Adverse Events
Safety and Tolerability - Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)Mild1Number of Adverse Events
Safety and Tolerability - Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsPlaceboMild2Number of Adverse Events
Safety and Tolerability - Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsErgoloid Mesylates (EM)Moderate0Number of Adverse Events
Safety and Tolerability - Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsErgoloid Mesylates (EM) and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)Moderate0Number of Adverse Events

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Screening PeriodSTARTEDAdult Males With Fragile X Syndrome15
Screening PeriodCOMPLETEDAdult Males With Fragile X Syndrome15
Screening PeriodNOT COMPLETEDAdult Males With Fragile X Syndrome0
Treatment Period 1: EM & PlaceboSTARTEDAdult Males With Fragile X Syndrome15
Treatment Period 1: EM & PlaceboCOMPLETEDAdult Males With Fragile X Syndrome15
Treatment Period 1: EM & PlaceboNOT COMPLETEDAdult Males With Fragile X Syndrome0
Treatment Period 2: EM & 5-HTPSTARTEDAdult Males With Fragile X Syndrome15
Treatment Period 2: EM & 5-HTPCOMPLETEDAdult Males With Fragile X Syndrome15
Treatment Period 2: EM & 5-HTPNOT COMPLETEDAdult Males With Fragile X Syndrome0
Treatment Period 3: 5-HTP & PlaceboSTARTEDAdult Males With Fragile X Syndrome15

Adverse events28

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherIncreased IrritabilityPsychiatric disordersErgoloid Mesylates (EM) and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)0150
otherIncreased IrritabilityPsychiatric disordersPlacebo2152
otherIncreased IrritabilityPsychiatric disordersErgoloid Mesylates (EM) and Placebo0150
otherIncreased IrritabilityPsychiatric disorders5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) and Placebo0150
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersErgoloid Mesylates (EM) and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)1151
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo0150
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersErgoloid Mesylates (EM) and Placebo0150
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) and Placebo0150
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersErgoloid Mesylates (EM) and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)0150
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo0150

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityErgoloid Mesylates (EM) and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)015
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo015
Total, all-cause mortalityErgoloid Mesylates (EM) and Placebo015
Total, all-cause mortality5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) and Placebo015
Total, other adverse eventsErgoloid Mesylates (EM) and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)115
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo315
Total, other adverse eventsErgoloid Mesylates (EM) and Placebo215
Total, other adverse events5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) and Placebo115
Total, serious adverse eventsErgoloid Mesylates (EM) and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)015
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo015

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Go/No-Go TaskSecondary outcome

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05030129

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05030129/results?page=2