ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05042362

A Study to Learn More About How Well Elinzanetant Works and How Safe it is for the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms (Hot Flashes) That Are Caused by Hormonal Changes Over 26 Weeks in Women Who Have Been Through the Menopause

NCT05042362, Phase 3, Completed, Bayer; results first posted 2026-02-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Learn More About How Well Elinzanetant Works and How Safe it is for the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms (Hot Flashes) That Are Caused by Hormonal Changes Over 26 Weeks in Women Who Have Been Through the Menopause. Trials, record NCT05042362. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05042362

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Learn More About How Well Elinzanetant Works and How Safe it is for the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms (Hot Flashes) That Are Caused by Hormonal Changes Over 26 Weeks in Women Who Have Been Through the Menopause
NCT number
NCT05042362
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
396 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Bayer
Conditions
Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With Menopause, Hot Flashes
Interventions
Elinzanetant (BAY3427080), Placebo
First posted
2021-09-13
Last updated
2026-02-12
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2020-004908-33
Results first posted
2026-02-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 4 (Assessed by Hot Flash Daily Diary [HFDD]).From baseline to Week 4
The frequency of moderate to severe HF for each week during the treatment period was calculated using the available data during that particular week. Specifically for Week 4, Days 22-28 were used (Day 1 corresponds to start of treatment). Mean daily frequency is calculated as total number of moderate to severe HF during that week divided by the total number of available days with data during that week
PrimaryMean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 12 (Assessed by HFDD).From baseline to Week 12
The frequency of moderate to severe HF for each week during the treatment period was calculated using the available data during that particular week. Specifically for Week 12, Days 78-84 were used (Day 1 corresponds to start of treatment). Mean daily frequency is calculated as total number of moderate to severe HF during that week divided by the total number of available days with data during that week
PrimaryMean Change in Severity of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 4 (Assessed by HFDD).From baseline to Week 4
In the HFDD, hot flash (HF) severity is scored as 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe; a decrease indicates improvement. The diary records the number of mild, moderate, and severe HFs during day and night. Mild HFs are a "sensation of heat without sweating"; moderate are "heat with sweating but able to continue activity"; severe are "heat with sweating that stops activity." Baseline mean daily severity is calculated as: (2×moderateHFs+3×severeHFs)÷(totalmoderate+severeHFs).(2 × moderate HFs + 3 × severe HFs) ÷ (total moderate + severe HFs).(2×moderateHFs+3×severeHFs)÷(totalmoderate+severeHFs). If none occur, severity=0. Weekly severity during treatment is based on available days (Week 4: Days 22-28; Week 12: Days 78-84; Day 1=start of treatment), averaging the mean daily severity for that week. If more than 2 days are missing, the weekly value is set to missing.
PrimaryMean Change in Severity of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 12 (Assessed by HFDD).From baseline to Week 12
In the HFDD, hot flash (HF) severity is categorized as 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe; thus, a decrease indicates improvement. The HFDD records the number of mild, moderate, and severe HFs during day and night. Mild HFs are a "sensation of heat without sweating"; moderate involve "heat with sweating but able to continue activity"; severe involve "heat with sweating that stops activity." Mean daily severity at baseline is calculated as: (2 × moderate HFs) + (3 × severe HFs)\\\] ÷ (total moderate + severe HFs). If none occur, severity is set to 0. Weekly severity during treatment is based on available days (Week 4: Days 22-28; Week 12: Days 78-84; Day 1=start of treatment), averaging mean daily severity across that week. If more than 2 days are missing, the week is set to missing.
SecondaryMean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 1 (Assessed by HFDD).From baseline to Week 1
The frequency of moderate to severe HF for each week during the treatment period was calculated using the available data during that particular week. Specifically for Week 1, Days 2-8 were used (Day 1 corresponds to start of treatment). Mean daily frequency is calculated as total number of moderate to severe HF during that week divided by the total number of available days with data during that week
SecondaryMean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline Over Time.From baseline to Week 30
The frequency of moderate to severe HF for each week during the treatment period was calculated using the available data during that particular week. Specifically, for Week 1 Days 2-8 were used instead of 1-7, because the intake started on Day 1 only before going to bed, for Week 4 Days 22-28 were used and for Week 12 Days 78-84 were used (Day 1 corresponds to start of treatment). These data were aggregated to a mean daily frequency as (total number of moderate to severe HF during that week) / (total number of available days with data during that week). In case data was not available for more than 2 days within a week, the value for that particular week was set to missing.
SecondaryMean Change in Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b (PROMIS SD SF 8b) Total T-score From Baseline to Week 12.From baseline to Week 12
In controversy of what you have been proposing above here you are just explaining the PROMIS SD SF 8b scores, not the secondary endpoint which is the change in the T-scores from BL to week 12 The PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b (PROMIS SD SF 8b) measures sleep disturbance over the past 7 days using 8 items assessing sleep quality, depth, restorative sleep, difficulty falling or staying asleep, and perceptions of sleep adequacy and satisfaction. Items use 5-point response options that vary by item (e.g., Not at all → Very much; Never → Always; Very poor → Very good). Item scores sum to a raw score of 8-40, which is converted to a T-score (mean 50, SD 10; range 28.9-76.5). Higher scores reflect greater sleep disturbance. PROMIS cut points classify T-scores of 55-59 as mild, 60-69 as moderate, and ≥70 as severe disturbance.
SecondaryMean Menopause Specific Quality of Life Scale (MENQOL) Total Score From Baseline to Week 12.From baseline to Week 12
The MENQOL questionnaire was comprised of 29 items assessing the presence of menopausal symptoms and the impact of menopause on health-related quality of life over the past week. The items assessed four domains of symptoms and functioning: VMS, psychosocial functioning, physical functioning, and sexual functioning. For each item, the participant indicated if they had experienced the symptom (yes/no). If participants selected yes, participants rated how bothered they were by the symptom using a six-point verbal descriptor scale, with response options ranging from 0 'not at all bothered' to 6 'extremely bothered'. Based on the individual responses, item scores, domain scores, and a total MENQOL score were calculated. Each score ranged from 1-8, higher scores indicated greater bother.
SecondaryMean Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Total Score From Baseline to Week 12.From baseline to Week 12
The BDI-II was a 21-item questionnaire assessed the intensity of depressive symptoms over the past 2 weeks. Each item was a list of four statements arranged in increasing levels of severity about a particular symptom of depression. Items used a 4-point verbal response scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (extreme form of each symptom); specific response options were tailored to the aspect of depression being measured in each item. A total score ranging from 0 to 63 was calculated with scores of 0-13 indicating mild minimal range, 14 - 19 mild depression, 20 - 28 indicating moderate and 29 - 63 severe depression (higher score = greater depression).
SecondaryMean Change in BDI-II Total Score From Baseline to Week 26.From baseline to Week 26
The BDI-II was a 21-item questionnaire assessing the intensity of depressive symptoms over the past 2 weeks. Each item was a list of four statements arranged in increasing levels of severity about a particular symptom of depression. Items used a 4-point verbal response scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (extreme form of each symptom); specific response options were tailored to the aspect of depression being measured in each item. A total score ranging from 0 to 63 was calculated with scores of 0-13 indicating mild minimal range, 14 - 19 mild depression, 20 - 28 indicating moderate and 29 - 63 severe depression (higher score = greater depression).

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 4 (Assessed by Hot Flash Daily Diary [HFDD]).From baseline to Week 4Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data.Hot Flashes per dayMEAN
PRIMARYMean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 12 (Assessed by HFDD).From baseline to Week 12Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data.Hot Flashes per dayMEAN
PRIMARYMean Change in Severity of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 4 (Assessed by HFDD).From baseline to Week 4Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data.Units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYMean Change in Severity of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 12 (Assessed by HFDD).From baseline to Week 12Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data.Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 1 (Assessed by HFDD).From baseline to Week 1Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data.Hot Flashes per dayMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline Over Time.From baseline to Week 30Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data.Hot Flashes per dayMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b (PROMIS SD SF 8b) Total T-score From Baseline to Week 12.From baseline to Week 12Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data.T-scoreMEAN
SECONDARYMean Menopause Specific Quality of Life Scale (MENQOL) Total Score From Baseline to Week 12.From baseline to Week 12Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data.Scores on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Total Score From Baseline to Week 12.From baseline to Week 12Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data.Scores on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in BDI-II Total Score From Baseline to Week 26.From baseline to Week 26Participants in full analysis set (FAS) with evaluable data.Scores on scaleMEAN

Results by group54

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 4 (Assessed by Hot Flash Daily Diary [HFDD]).Elinzanetant 120 mgBaseline13.38Standard Deviation 6.57Hot Flashes per day
Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 4 (Assessed by Hot Flash Daily Diary [HFDD]).Placebo - Elinzanetant 120 mgBaseline14.26Standard Deviation 13.94Hot Flashes per day
Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 4 (Assessed by Hot Flash Daily Diary [HFDD]).Elinzanetant 120 mgWeek 4: Change from baseline-7.48Standard Deviation 5.80Hot Flashes per day
Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 4 (Assessed by Hot Flash Daily Diary [HFDD]).Placebo - Elinzanetant 120 mgWeek 4: Change from baseline-4.37Standard Deviation 6.73Hot Flashes per day
Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 12 (Assessed by HFDD).Elinzanetant 120 mgBaseline13.38Standard Deviation 6.57Hot Flashes per day
Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 12 (Assessed by HFDD).Placebo - Elinzanetant 120 mgBaseline14.26Standard Deviation 13.94Hot Flashes per day
Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 12 (Assessed by HFDD).Elinzanetant 120 mgWeek 12: Change from baseline-8.74Standard Deviation 6.70Hot Flashes per day
Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 12 (Assessed by HFDD).Placebo - Elinzanetant 120 mgWeek 12: Change from baseline-5.53Standard Deviation 10.16Hot Flashes per day
Mean Change in Severity of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 4 (Assessed by HFDD).Elinzanetant 120 mgBaseline2.56Standard Deviation 0.22Units on a scale
Mean Change in Severity of Moderate to Severe HF From Baseline to Week 4 (Assessed by HFDD).Placebo - Elinzanetant 120 mgBaseline2.53Standard Deviation 0.23Units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDElinzanetant 120 mg199
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo - Elinzanetant 120 mg197
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDElinzanetant 120 mg154
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo - Elinzanetant 120 mg155
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDElinzanetant 120 mg45
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo - Elinzanetant 120 mg42

Adverse events90

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherFatigueGeneral disordersElinzanetant 120 mg Week 1-121419914
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo Week 1-1231943
otherFatigueGeneral disordersElinzanetant 120 mg Week 13-2601710
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo - Elinzanetant 120 mg Week 13-2611681
otherFatigueGeneral disordersElinzanetant 120 mg Week 1-261536715
otherDepression rating scale score increasedInvestigationsElinzanetant 120 mg Week 1-121219913
otherDepression rating scale score increasedInvestigationsPlacebo Week 1-121119412
otherDepression rating scale score increasedInvestigationsElinzanetant 120 mg Week 13-2611711
otherDepression rating scale score increasedInvestigationsPlacebo - Elinzanetant 120 mg Week 13-2621682
otherDepression rating scale score increasedInvestigationsElinzanetant 120 mg Week 1-261436716

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityElinzanetant 120 mg Week 1-120199
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Week 1-120194
Total, all-cause mortalityElinzanetant 120 mg Week 13-260171
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo - Elinzanetant 120 mg Week 13-260168
Total, all-cause mortalityElinzanetant 120 mg Week 1-260367
Total, other adverse eventsElinzanetant 120 mg Week 1-1238199
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Week 1-1228194
Total, other adverse eventsElinzanetant 120 mg Week 13-266171
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo - Elinzanetant 120 mg Week 13-269168
Total, other adverse eventsElinzanetant 120 mg Week 1-2651367

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
39172446DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05042362

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05042362/results?page=2