ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Effects of Non-invasive Neuromodulation on Food Desire, Chewing Pattern, Executive Functions and Oxidative Stress.

NCT05046145, Not applicable, Completed, Universidade Federal do Piauí

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleEffects of Non-invasive Neuromodulation on Food Desire, Chewing Pattern, Executive Functions and Oxidative Stress.ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT05046145ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment36 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorUniversidade Federal do PiauíClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsCraving, Mastication Disorder, Memory Disorders, Executive Dysfunction, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Inflammation, Oxidative StressClinicalTrials.gov
Interventionsspeech therapy for chewing + real tDCSClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2021-09-16ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2022-11-02ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
Primarychange in desire to consume food.pre-intervention.
Questionnaires of Intense Food Desires - Trait (QDIC-T) validated for Brazilian Portuguese. The higher the score, the greater the amount of food craving presented.The QDIC-T scale is done on a 6-point scale with scores ranging from 39 to 214 points.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Primarychange in desire to consume food.post-intervention (immediately after the end of study participation).
Questionnaires of Intense Food Desires - Trait (QDIC-T) validated for Brazilian Portuguese. The higher the score, the greater the amount of food craving presented. The QDIC-T scale is done on a 6-point scale with scores ranging from 39 to 214 points.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Primarychange in the executive brain functions - working memorypre-intervention.
Trial Making Test (A and B). Assessments with single measurements (measurement of time, in seconds, to perform the test). the measurement unit for evaluating the outcome of these tests will be the amount of errors presented and the execution time (in seconds). The shorter the time and fewer errors, the better the result.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Primarychange in the executive brain functions - cognitive flexibilitypost-intervention (immediately after the end of study participation).
Stroop Tests. Assessments with single measurements (measurement of time, in seconds, to perform the test). the measurement unit for evaluating the outcome of these tests will be the amount of errors presented and the execution time (in seconds). The shorter the time and fewer errors, the better the result.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Secondarychange in the final value of inflammation scorespre-intervention.inflammation markers (PCR in serum). The biochemical dosage of all elements will be in mg/L, higher values will represent a higher concentration, that is, a greater degree of inflammatory processes.ClinicalTrials.gov
Secondarychange in the final value of inflammation scorespost-intervention (immediately after the end of study participation).inflammation markers (PCR in serum). The biochemical dosage of all elements will be in mg/L, higher values will represent a higher concentration, that is, a greater degree of inflammatory processes.ClinicalTrials.gov
Secondarychange in the final value of antioxidant activitypre-intervention.
antioxidant activity (Catalase in erythrocytes). The biochemical dosage of all elements will be in mg/L, higher values will represent a higher concentration, that is, a greater degree of inflammatory processes.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Secondarychange in the final value of antioxidant activitypost-intervention (immediately after the end of study participation).
antioxidant activity (Catalase in erythrocytes). The biochemical dosage of all elements will be in mg/L, higher values will represent a higher concentration, that is, a greater degree of inflammatory processes.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Secondarychange in desire to consume food.pre-intervention.
Questionnaires of Intense Food Desires - State (QDIC-E); validated for Brazilian Portuguese. QDIC-E is made up of a five-point scale, ranging from 15 to 75 points. The higher the score, the greater the amount of food craving presented.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Secondarychange in desire to consume food.post-intervention (immediately after the end of study participation).
Questionnaires of Intense Food Desires - State (QDIC-E); validated for Brazilian.Portuguese. The higher the score, the greater the amount of food craving presented. QDIC-E is made up of a five-point scale, ranging from 15 to 75 points.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 9

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
12656297BACKGROUNDPubMed
23020641BACKGROUNDPubMed
27372845BACKGROUNDPubMed
27498606BACKGROUNDPubMed
27866120BACKGROUNDPubMed
28479407BACKGROUNDPubMed
31315679BACKGROUNDPubMed
31901449BACKGROUNDPubMed
32958176BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Stroop Color-Word TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)