ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05055128

A Study in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis to Investigate Safety, Tolerability, and Healing Rates After 4 Weeks Treatment of X842 or Lansoprazole and Symptom Pattern During Subsequent 4 Weeks Treatment With Lansoprazole

NCT05055128, Phase 2, Completed, Cinclus Pharma Holding AB; results first posted 2023-11-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis to Investigate Safety, Tolerability, and Healing Rates After 4 Weeks Treatment of X842 or Lansoprazole and Symptom Pattern During Subsequent 4 Weeks Treatment With Lansoprazole. Trials, record NCT05055128. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05055128

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis to Investigate Safety, Tolerability, and Healing Rates After 4 Weeks Treatment of X842 or Lansoprazole and Symptom Pattern During Subsequent 4 Weeks Treatment With Lansoprazole
NCT number
NCT05055128
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
248 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Cinclus Pharma Holding AB
Conditions
Erosive Esophagitis
Interventions
X842, X842 Dummy, Lansoprazole, Lansoprazole Dummy
First posted
2021-09-24
Last updated
2026-07-01
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2020-003319-91
Results first posted
2023-11-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa HealingWeek 4
The healing of erosive esophagitis due to gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) was assessed. It supported the dose selection X842,through the assessment of healing of erosive esophagitis due to GERD based on endoscopic assessment after 4 weeks of treatment. The dose that would lead to having 85% of the patients have esophageal mucosa healing after 4 weeks of treatment. Following the endoscopic evaluation, all patients received subsequent 4 weeks of open-label treatment with lansoprazole. Repeated symptom evaluation was assessed during this period to detect the symptom pattern. Endoscopy evaluation at 4 weeks was based on the level and duration of acid control achieved with X842. Symptom evaluation was assessed using the validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) QOLRAD (Heartburn version) and patient diaries (RESQ-eDiary).
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)From Screening (Day -7 to Day 0) until Week 8
The safety and tolerability of the four dose levels of X842 and Lansoprazole were evaluated, where Lansoprazole served as the active comparator. Here TEAE- Treatment-emergent adverse event, ADR- Adverse drug reaction, SAE- Serious adverse event, and AESI- Adverse events of special interest.
SecondaryPercentage of Heartburn-Free 24-hour DaysWeeks 1 and 8
Heartburn-free in a 24-hour day was a day where patient reported having no burning feeling or pain behind breast or in center of upper stomach for both morning and evening. Percentage of heartburn-free 24-hour days based on eDiary(Reflux Symptom Questionnaire electronic Diary: RESQ-eDiary) was evaluated. Reflux-related symptom pattern was evaluated during initial 4 weeks of treatment with four dose levels of X842 and with Lansoprazole, and symptom pattern during subsequent additional 4 weeks Lansoprazole treatment in open-label. Modified RESQ-eDiary was validated self-reported questionnaire electronic symptom diary. mRESQ-eD has 3 domains \[i.e. Heartburn (min-max: 0-10), Other GERD signs/symptoms (min-max:0-15) and Regurgitations/Reflux (min-max: 0-8)\]. Endoscopy followed by lansoprazole administration and symptom evaluation using PRO QOLRAD (Heartburn version) and patient diaries assessed acid control achieved with X842 at 4 weeks.
SecondaryPercentage at Most-mild Heartburn 24-hour DaysWeeks 1 and 8
Heartburn with at most mild symptoms in a 24-hour day was defined as a day where the patient reported having either no symptoms, very mild symptoms, or mild burning feeling or pain behind the breast or in the center of the upper stomach (score between 0-2) for both morning and evening. Heartburn assessed the severity as per the following scores (0=Did not have, 1=Very mild, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Moderately severe, 5=Severe). Here higher scores represent the worst outcome, whereas lower scores represent the better outcome. After endoscopic evaluation, patients received lansoprazole, and symptom evaluation was conducted to detect patterns. Endoscopy evaluation at 4 weeks was based on the level and duration of acid control achieved with X842. Symptom evaluation involved the use of validated PRO QOLRAD (Heartburn version) and patient diaries.
SecondaryInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeeks 1 and 8
Investigator assessed severity and frequency of patients' heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia in 7 days. Assessment included both severity grade (for severity, items were coded: none, mild, moderate, severe where none represented no complaints, severe represented incapacitating symptoms) and frequency (for frequency, a 7-graded Likert scale was used, ranging from none to all of time) of symptoms. Symptoms were scored as follows: none (no complaints), mild (aware of symptom, but easily tolerated), moderate (discomforting symptom, sufficient to cause interference with normal daily activities and/or sleep), severe (incapacitating symptom, with inability to perform normal daily activities and/or sleep). Following endoscopic evaluation, patients received lansoprazole and underwent symptom evaluation using validated PRO QOLRAD (Heartburn version) and patient diaries.Here, for frequency- All of the time and None of the time, and for symptoms- none and severe data has been presented.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 1, and 8
Reflux-related symptom pattern was evaluated during initial 4 weeks of treatment with 4 dose levels of X842 and with Lansoprazole, and symptom pattern during subsequent additional 4 weeks of open-label treatment with Lansoprazole. Heartburn version of QOLRAD is a disease-specific instrument containing 25 questions addressing concerns associated with gastrointestinal symptoms. Questions were rated on a seven-grade (1-7) Likert scale, where a score of 1 represented low quality of life, and as score increased, the patient's condition was considered better. Questions were categorized into 5 domains: emotional distress, sleep disturbance, vitality, food/drink problems, and physical/social functioning. The score in each domain was calculated as the mean of all items in that domain. The score ranges from 1 to 175, higher scores mean a better outcome. After endoscopic evaluation, patients received lansoprazole and underwent symptom evaluation using validated PRO QOLRAD and patient diaries.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa HealingWeek 4
The FAS consisted of all patients who had been randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. FAS erosive is a subset of FAS consisted of patients who had been classified as erosive (Grade A, B, C or D) as screening according to the central reading or imputed by local reading if missing.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)From Screening (Day -7 to Day 0) until Week 8The safety analysis set consisted of all patients who had been randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment actually received.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Heartburn-Free 24-hour DaysWeeks 1 and 8
The FAS consisted of all patients who had been randomized and received at least 1 dose of the study drug. Here, the Number Analyzed in the table represents the count of patients who were measured and analyzed for the specific Outcome Measure during the given week.
Percentage of daysMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage at Most-mild Heartburn 24-hour DaysWeeks 1 and 8
The FAS consisted of all patients who had been randomized and received at least 1 dose of the study drug. Here, the Number Analyzed in the table represents the count of patients who were measured and analyzed for the specific Outcome Measure during the given week.
Percentage of daysMEAN
SECONDARYInvestigator Assessment of Symptoms by Frequency and SeverityWeeks 1 and 8
The FAS consisted of all patients who had been randomized and received at least 1 dose of the study drug. Here, the Number Analyzed in the table represents the count of patients who were measured and analyzed for the specific Outcome Measure during the given week.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 1, and 8
The FAS consisted of all patients who had been randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, the Number Analyzed in the table represents the count of patients who were measured and analyzed for the specific Outcome Measure during the given week.
Scores on scaleMEAN

Results by group235

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa HealingX842 25 mg BID28Participants
Number of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa HealingX842 50 mg BID28Participants
Number of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa HealingX842 75 mg BID32Participants
Number of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa HealingX842 100 mg BID18Participants
Number of Patients With Esophageal Mucosa HealingLansoprazole20Participants
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)X842 25 mg BIDAny AE15Participants
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)X842 50 mg BIDAny AE10Participants
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)X842 75 mg BIDAny AE12Participants
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)X842 100 mg BIDAny AE11Participants
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)LansoprazoleAny AE10Participants

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDX842 25 mg BID51
Overall StudySTARTEDX842 50 mg BID48
Overall StudySTARTEDX842 75 mg BID52
Overall StudySTARTEDX842 100 mg BID47
Overall StudySTARTEDLansoprazole50
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDX842 25 mg BID45
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDX842 50 mg BID45
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDX842 75 mg BID50
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDX842 100 mg BID41
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLansoprazole47

Adverse events260

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersX842 25 mg BID1511
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersX842 50 mg BID0480
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersX842 75 mg BID1521
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersX842 100 mg BID0470
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLansoprazole0500
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersX842 25 mg BID0510
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersX842 50 mg BID0480
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersX842 75 mg BID0520
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersX842 100 mg BID0470
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLansoprazole1501

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityX842 25 mg BID051
Total, all-cause mortalityX842 50 mg BID048
Total, all-cause mortalityX842 75 mg BID052
Total, all-cause mortalityX842 100 mg BID047
Total, all-cause mortalityLansoprazole050
Total, other adverse eventsX842 25 mg BID1451
Total, other adverse eventsX842 50 mg BID1048
Total, other adverse eventsX842 75 mg BID1252
Total, other adverse eventsX842 100 mg BID1147
Total, other adverse eventsLansoprazole1050

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
40183130DERIVEDPubMed
40470733DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05055128

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05055128/results?page=2