ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05070650

Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Acetylcysteine, Paracetamol and Phenylephrine for the Treatment of Common Cold

NCT05070650, Phase 3, Withdrawn, Sandoz

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Acetylcysteine, Paracetamol and Phenylephrine for the Treatment of Common Cold. Trials, record NCT05070650. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05070650

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Acetylcysteine, Paracetamol and Phenylephrine for the Treatment of Common Cold
NCT number
NCT05070650
Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
0 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sandoz
Conditions
Common Cold
Interventions
Acetylcysteine, Paracetamol, Phenylephrine
First posted
2021-10-07
Last updated
2024-09-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange from baseline in the daily Score of 8 symptoms related to mucus production (SUM8)Baseline, Day 5
Score of 8 symptoms related to mucus production (SUM8) will be assessed by the patient in a patient's diary at screening (this will constitute the baseline value) and daily on each day of treatment until and including Day 5. For assessing SUM8 the patients will have to answer questions about their cough and phlegm status. The SUM8 consisted of the sum of the answers to the eight core questions. For calculating the SUM8 the lowest rating corresponds to 0 and highest rating corresponds to 4, with 4 representing the greatest severity of symptoms. The SUM8 thus had a scale range of 0-32 with 0 representing best possible symptoms, and 32 representing greatest severity of symptoms.
SecondaryNumber of adverse events and serious adverse eventsUntil Day 6, or earlier in case of premature terminationAssessment of safety and tolerability of the investigational medicinal product against the comparator product for the treatment of common cold
SecondaryTime to onset of actionDay 1 to Day 5Time to onset of action defined as first day of treatment with investigational product on which SUM8 shows statistically significant difference from the comparator product will be reported
SecondaryScore of 8 symptoms related to mucus production (SUM8) development over the course of the studyBaseline, Day 1 to Day 5
Score of 8 symptoms related to mucus production (SUM8) will be assessed by the patient in a patient's diary at screening (this will constitute the baseline value) and daily on each day of treatment until and including Day 5. For assessing SUM8 the patients will have to answer questions about their cough and phlegm status. The SUM8 consisted of the sum of the answers to the eight core questions. For calculating the SUM8 the lowest rating corresponds to 0 and highest rating corresponds to 4, with 4 representing the greatest severity of symptoms. The SUM8 thus had a scale range of 0-32 with 0 representing best possible symptoms, and 32 representing greatest severity of symptoms.
SecondaryAssessment of separate items of Score of 8 symptoms related to mucus production (SUM8)Baseline, Day 1 to Day 5
Score of 8 symptoms related to mucus production (SUM8) will be assessed by the patient in a patient's diary at screening (this will constitute the baseline value) and daily on each day of treatment until and including Day 5. For assessing SUM8 the patients will have to answer questions about their cough and phlegm status. The SUM8 consisted of the sum of the answers to the eight core questions. For calculating the SUM8 the lowest rating corresponds to 0 and highest rating corresponds to 4, with 4 representing the greatest severity of symptoms. The SUM8 thus had a scale range of 0-32 with 0 representing best possible symptoms, and 32 representing greatest severity of symptoms.
SecondarySum of changes from baseline in the daily Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey (WURSS-21)Baseline, Day 1 to Day 5
The Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey-21 (WURSS-21) Questionnaire is an evaluative illness-specific outcomes instrument designed to assess the severity of cold symptoms and the impact of the common cold (range 0-140), with higher scores indicating more symptoms and functional impairment.
SecondaryAssessment of separate items of Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey (WURSS-21)Baseline, Day 1 to Day 5
The Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey-21 (WURSS-21) Questionnaire is an evaluative illness-specific outcomes instrument designed to assess the severity of cold symptoms and the impact of the common cold (range 0-140), with higher scores indicating more symptoms and functional impairment.
SecondaryPercentage of responders and non-responders to treatmentOn Day 3, and after the end of treatment on Day 6Percentage of responders and non-responders to treatment based on the assessment of overall response to treatment by the investigator will be reported.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05070650

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05070650/registered