ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05073458

Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Parsaclisib in Participants With Primary Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

NCT05073458, Phase 3, Terminated, Incyte Corporation; results first posted 2025-01-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Parsaclisib in Participants With Primary Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia. Trials, record NCT05073458. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05073458

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Parsaclisib in Participants With Primary Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
NCT number
NCT05073458
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
13 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Incyte Corporation
Conditions
Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA)
Interventions
parsaclisinib, placebo
First posted
2021-10-11
Last updated
2025-11-03
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2021-002844-66
Results first posted
2025-01-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Attaining a Durable Hemoglobin Responseup to Week 24
A durable hemoglobin response was defined as hemoglobin ≥10 grams per deciliter (g/dL) with an increase from Baseline of ≥2 g/dL not attributed to rescue therapy at ≥3 of the 4 available visits at Week 12 and/or later during the 24-week double-blind treatment period.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-point Increase From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
The FACIT-F scale was developed to assess anemia-related fatigue. The FACIT-F is a 13-item measure that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function over the past 7 days. A clinically meaningful change in the FACIT-F score was defined as ≥3-point increase from Baseline. Item scores range from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"), and the total score ranges from 0 to 52; lower scores indicate greater fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a 50 Meter Increase From Baseline to Week 24 in a 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline; Week 24The 6MWT is used to evaluate submaximal exercise capacity. It is a self-paced measurement of the distance that a participant can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the FACIT-F Score at Each Post-Baseline VisitBaseline; Day 1; Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 40, 48, 56, and every 16 weeks post-Week 56
The FACIT-F scale was developed to assess anemia-related fatigue. The FACIT-F is a 13-item measure that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function over the past 7 days. A clinically meaningful change in the FACIT-F score was defined as ≥3-point increase from Baseline. Item scores range from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"), and the total score ranges from 0 to 52; lower scores indicate greater fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. End of Treatment, Double-blind Period: assessment performed for participants who discontinued treatment before Week 24. End of Treatment, Open-label Period: assessment performed for participants who discontinued treatment after Week 24 and before Week 56. Follow-up Visit 3 occurred 12 weeks after the end of treatment visit.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in the FACIT-F Score at Each Post-Baseline VisitBaseline; Day 1; Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 40, 48, 56, and every 16 weeks post-Week 56
The FACIT-F scale was developed to assess anemia-related fatigue. The FACIT-F is a 13-item measure that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function over the past 7 days. A clinically meaningful change in the FACIT-F score was defined as ≥3-point increase from Baseline. Item scores range from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"), and the total score ranges from 0 to 52; lower scores indicate greater fatigue. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as (\[the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\]/Baseline value) x 100. End of Treatment, Double-blind Period: assessment performed for participants who discontinued treatment before Week 24. End of Treatment, Open-label Period: assessment performed for participants who discontinued treatment after Week 24 and before Week 56. Follow-up Visit 3 occurred 12 weeks after the end of treatment visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Each Post-Baseline VisitBaseline; Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, and every 8 weeks post-Week 56
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. End of Treatment, Double-blind Period: assessment performed for participants who discontinued treatment before Week 24. End of Treatment, Open-label Period: assessment performed for participants who discontinued treatment after Week 24 and before Week 56. Follow-up Visits 1, 2, and 3 occurred 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively, after the end of treatment visit.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Each Post-Baseline VisitBaseline; Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, and every 8 weeks post-Week 56
Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as (\[the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\]/Baseline value) x 100. End of Treatment, Double-blind Period: assessment performed for participants who discontinued treatment before Week 24. End of Treatment, Open-label Period: assessment performed for participants who discontinued treatment after Week 24 and before Week 56. Follow-up Visits 1, 2, and 3 occurred 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively, after the end of treatment visit.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Received Transfusions From Week 6 to Week 24 and From Week 24 to Week 48Week 6 to Week 24; Week 24 to Week 48
Transfusion was permitted as a rescue treatment. Rescue medication was to be considered if the absolute hemoglobin level continued to decline, there was a \> 1 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin from the prior assessment, or the participant developed new or worsening symptoms of warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Daily Corticosteroid Dose at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
A new or increased dose of corticosteroids (prednisone or equivalent) from the Day 1 dose was permitted as rescue treatment. Rescue medication was to be considered if the absolute hemoglobin level continued to decline, there was a \> 1 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin from the prior assessment, or the participant developed new or worsening symptoms of wAIHA. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Daily Corticosteroid Dose at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
A new or increased dose of corticosteroids (prednisone or equivalent) from the Day 1 dose was permitted as rescue treatment. Rescue medication was to be considered if the absolute hemoglobin level continued to decline, there was a \> 1 g/dL decrease in hemoglobin from the prior assessment, or the participant developed new or worsening symptoms of wAIHA. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as (\[the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value\]/Baseline value) x 100.

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Attaining a Durable Hemoglobin Responseup to Week 24
Safety Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Treatment groups were determined according to the actual treatment the participant received on Day 1 regardless of assigned study treatment. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-point Increase From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 24Baseline; Week 24Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a 50 Meter Increase From Baseline to Week 24 in a 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline; Week 24Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed,percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the FACIT-F Score at Each Post-Baseline VisitBaseline; Day 1; Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 40, 48, 56, and every 16 weeks post-Week 56Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in the FACIT-F Score at Each Post-Baseline VisitBaseline; Day 1; Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 40, 48, 56, and every 16 weeks post-Week 56Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed,percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Each Post-Baseline VisitBaseline; Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, and every 8 weeks post-Week 56Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.grams per literMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Each Post-Baseline VisitBaseline; Day 1; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, and every 8 weeks post-Week 56Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Received Transfusions From Week 6 to Week 24 and From Week 24 to Week 48Week 6 to Week 24; Week 24 to Week 48
Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed. The number of participants analyzed at Weeks 6 to 24 reflects the number of participants who received study drug for at least 43 days. The number of participants analyzed at Weeks 24 to 48 reflects the number of participants who received study drug during the open-label period.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Daily Corticosteroid Dose at Week 24Baseline; Week 24Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.milligramsMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Daily Corticosteroid Dose at Week 24Baseline; Week 24Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percentage changeMEAN

Results by group176

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Attaining a Durable Hemoglobin ResponseParsaclisib33.3percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Attaining a Durable Hemoglobin ResponsePlacebo25.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a ≥3-point Increase From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 24Parsaclisib66.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a ≥3-point Increase From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 24Placebo50.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a 50 Meter Increase From Baseline to Week 24 in a 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)Placebo0.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a 50 Meter Increase From Baseline to Week 24 in a 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)Parsaclisib100.0percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in the FACIT-F Score at Each Post-Baseline VisitPlaceboBaseline28.5Standard Deviation 5.96scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in the FACIT-F Score at Each Post-Baseline VisitPlacebo Followed by ParsaclisibBaseline31.3Standard Deviation 5.12scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in the FACIT-F Score at Each Post-Baseline VisitParsaclisibBaseline31.1Standard Deviation 7.78scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in the FACIT-F Score at Each Post-Baseline VisitPlaceboChange from Baseline at Week 88.2Standard Deviation 5.63scores on a scale

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
24-week Double-blind PeriodSTARTEDParsaclisib7
24-week Double-blind PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo Followed by Parsaclisib6
24-week Double-blind PeriodCOMPLETEDParsaclisib4
24-week Double-blind PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo Followed by Parsaclisib4
24-week Double-blind PeriodNOT COMPLETEDParsaclisib3
24-week Double-blind PeriodNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Followed by Parsaclisib2
24-week Open-label PeriodSTARTEDParsaclisib4
24-week Open-label PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo Followed by Parsaclisib4
24-week Open-label PeriodCOMPLETEDParsaclisib2
24-week Open-label PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo Followed by Parsaclisib2

Adverse events104

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo060
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersParsaclisib1111
otherAbdominal pain lowerGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo060
otherAbdominal pain lowerGastrointestinal disordersParsaclisib1111
otherAlanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsPlacebo060
otherAlanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsParsaclisib2113
otherAlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersPlacebo161
otherAlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersParsaclisib0110
otherAmnesiaNervous system disordersPlacebo161
otherAmnesiaNervous system disordersParsaclisib0110

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo06
Total, all-cause mortalityParsaclisib011
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo46
Total, other adverse eventsParsaclisib1011
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo06
Total, serious adverse eventsParsaclisib611

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Parsaclisib vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Parsaclisib vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05073458

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05073458/results?page=2