ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05106192

Triamcinolone Acetonide Injections in Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma Plaques With a Novel Needle-free Drug-delivery System.

NCT05106192, Not applicable, Withdrawn, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Triamcinolone Acetonide Injections in Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma Plaques With a Novel Needle-free Drug-delivery System. Trials, record NCT05106192. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05106192

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Triamcinolone Acetonide Injections in Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma Plaques With a Novel Needle-free Drug-delivery System.
NCT number
NCT05106192
Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
0 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Conditions
Mycosis Fungoides of Skin (Diagnosis), Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Non Hodgkin Lymphoma, Lymphomatoid Papulosis, Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Anaplastic, Lymphoma, Follicular
Interventions
Med-Jet Injector, Triamcinolone Acetonide, Bexarotene 1% Top Gel, Nitrogen Mustard, Conventional syringe
First posted
2021-11-03
Last updated
2025-06-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPain measurement between the Med-Jet and standard of care treatment.1.5 Hour after the treatment
The pain of injections with Medjet vs conventional topical therapies of bexarotene or nitrogen mustard will be measured using a visual standard analog pain scale 0 (no distress) to 10 (unbearable distress) immediately after each injection.
SecondaryParticipants Preference3 MonthsNumber of participants that prefer traditional treatment versus MedJet.
SecondaryTolerability of PruritusAt Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months
Tolerability will be measured using Pruritus score assessment in the Medjet and topical therapy cohorts using a visual standard analog itching scale 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable) with the affected plaques at each indicated visit.
SecondaryQuality of life due to skin conditions3 Months
The quality of life assessment will be done using the Dermatology Life Quality Index survey (DLQI) which will include a series of topics related to the skin condition including symptoms, feelings, effects on daily life, employment or schooling, personal relationships, and treatment. Each of the ten (10) questions are scored from 0 to 3, giving a score range from 0 (meaning no impact of skin disease on quality of life) to 30 (meaning maximum impact on quality of life). Resulting scores are as follows: 0-1 = No effect on patient's life, 2-5 = Small effect, 6-10 = Moderate effect, 11-20 = Very large effect, 21-30 = Extremely large effect.
SecondaryCAILS assessment of clinical efficacyAt Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months
Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (CAILS) is an assessment of individual lesions by the investigator of disease severity at the time of evaluation which can be used to monitor and compare lesions over time. CAILS is a 5-criterion scale ranging from 0 (no evidence) to 8 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the size of the lesion and severity of erythema, scaling, plaque elevation, and hypo- or hyperpigmentation. When making the assessment of severity, the Investigator will score the area with most clearance (ie, have scores of 0) within the treated plaque.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05106192

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05106192/registered