ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05214794

An Open-label, Phase 2 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab in Subjects With Systemic Sclerosis

NCT05214794, Phase 2, Completed, Maruho Co., Ltd.; results first posted 2026-02-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. An Open-label, Phase 2 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab in Subjects With Systemic Sclerosis. Trials, record NCT05214794. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05214794

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
An Open-label, Phase 2 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab in Subjects With Systemic Sclerosis
NCT number
NCT05214794
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
6 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Maruho Co., Ltd.
Conditions
Systemic Sclerosis
Interventions
nemolizumab
First posted
2022-01-31
Last updated
2026-02-13
Results first posted
2026-02-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Total Skin Thickness Score (Total mRSS) at Week 24Baseline and week 24
Compare pre- and post-treatment total mRSS at Week 24. The investigator assessed the degree of skin thickening for each of 17 sites (fingers of both hands, dorsum of both hands, both forearms, both upper arms, face, anterior chest, abdomen, both thighs, both lower legs, and dorsum of both feet) with a 4-point scale from 0 to 3; where 0 = normal skin, 1 = mild thickness, 2 = moderate thickness, and 3 = severe thickness. The total mRSS is the sum of the mRSS of 17 site
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Total Skin Thickness Score (Total mRSS) at Week 52From baseline up to Week 52
Compare pre- and post-treatment total mRSS at Week 52. The investigator assessed the degree of skin thickening for each of 17 sites (fingers of both hands, dorsum of both hands, both forearms, both upper arms, face, anterior chest, abdomen, both thighs, both lower legs, and dorsum of both feet) with a 4-point scale from 0 to 3; where 0 = normal skin, 1 = mild thickness, 2 = moderate thickness, and 3 = severe thickness. The total mRSS is the sum of the mRSS of 17 site
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24From baseline up to Week 24
Compare pre- and post-treatment HAQ-DI at Week 24. The HAQ is a questionnaire that patients with chronic diseases answer themselves to assess physical function related to activities of daily living. The questionnaire consists of 20 questions divided into eight categories (dressing and grooming, standing, eating, walking, hygiene, movement, grip strength, and others), which are rated on a four-point scale from 0 to 3. 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do. The highest value in each category is the index for that category, and the average of these is the HAQ-DI. The higher the HAQ-DI, the greater the degree of functional impairment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52From baseline up to Week 52
Compare pre- and post-treatment HAQ-DI at Week 52. The HAQ is a questionnaire that patients with chronic diseases answer themselves to assess physical function related to activities of daily living. The questionnaire consists of 20 questions divided into eight categories (dressing and grooming, standing, eating, walking, hygiene, movement, grip strength, and others), which are rated on a four-point scale from 0 to 3. 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do. The highest value in each category is the index for that category, and the average of these is the HAQ-DI. The higher the HAQ-DI, the greater the degree of functional impairment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percent Forced Vital Capacity (% FVC) at Week 24From baseline up to Week 24Compare pre- and post-treatment %FVC at Week 24. %FVC is the ratio of the actual measured FVC to the predicted FVC (predicted based on gender, age, and height).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percent Forced Vital Capacity (% FVC) at Week 52From baseline up to Week 52Compare pre- and post-treatment %FVC at Week 52. %FVC is the ratio of the actual measured FVC to the predicted FVC (predicted based on gender, age, and height).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percent Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (%DLco) at Week 24From baseline up to Week 24
Compare pre- and post-treatment %DLco at Week 24. Pulmonary diffusion capacity refers to the ability to supply gases such as oxygen from alveoli to the alveolar capillaries. DLco is measured for carbon monoxide (CO) and is expressed as the volume (mL) of CO that transfers from alveolar air to the blood per minute per 1mmHg of alveolar partial pressure. %DLco is the ratio of the actual measured DLco to the predicted DLco (predicated based on age, sex, and height)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percent Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (%DLco) at Week 52From baseline up to Week 52
Compare pre- and post-treatment %DLco at Week 52. Pulmonary diffusion capacity refers to the ability to supply gases such as oxygen from alveoli to the alveolar capillaries. DLco is measured for carbon monoxide (CO) and is expressed as the volume (mL) of CO that transfers from alveolar air to the blood per minute per 1mmHg of alveolar partial pressure. %DLco is the ratio of the actual measured DLco to the predicted DLco (predicated based on age, sex, and height)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment at Week 24From baseline up to Week 24
Compare pre- and post-treatment physician's global assessment at Week 24. Physician's global assessment is a visual analogue scale in which the attending physician assess the condition of systemic sclerosis based on severity, damage, and overall disease status. 0 is the best condition and 10 is the worst condition.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment at Week 52From baseline up to Week 52
Compare pre- and post-treatment physician's global assessment at Week 52. Physician's global assessment is a visual analogue scale in which the attending physician assess the condition of systemic sclerosis based on severity, damage, and overall disease status. 0 is the best condition and 10 is the worst condition.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Total Skin Thickness Score (Total mRSS) at Week 24Baseline and week 24FAS population included all participants who were enrolled.scores on scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Total Skin Thickness Score (Total mRSS) at Week 52From baseline up to Week 52FAS population included all participants who were enrolled.scores on scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24From baseline up to Week 24FAS population included all participants who were enrolled.scores on scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52From baseline up to Week 52FAS population included all participants who were enrolled.scores on scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Percent Forced Vital Capacity (% FVC) at Week 24From baseline up to Week 24FAS population included all participants who were enrolled.percentage of actual to predicted FCVMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Percent Forced Vital Capacity (% FVC) at Week 52From baseline up to Week 52FAS population included all participants who were enrolled.percentage of actual to predicted FCVMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Percent Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (%DLco) at Week 24From baseline up to Week 24FAS population included all participants who were enrolled.percentage of actual to predicted DLcoMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Percent Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (%DLco) at Week 52From baseline up to Week 52FAS population included all participants who were enrolled.percentage of actual to predicted DLcoMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment at Week 24From baseline up to Week 24FAS population included all participants who were enrolled.scores on scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment at Week 52From baseline up to Week 52FAS population included all participants who were enrolled.scores on scaleMEDIAN

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Total Skin Thickness Score (Total mRSS) at Week 24Nemolizumab-9.5Full Range -13 to -6scores on scale
Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Total Skin Thickness Score (Total mRSS) at Week 52Nemolizumab-10.0Full Range -14 to -7scores on scale
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24Nemolizumab0.000Full Range -0.13 to 0.38scores on scale
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52Nemolizumab0.063Full Range -0.13 to 0.25scores on scale
Change From Baseline in Percent Forced Vital Capacity (% FVC) at Week 24Nemolizumab-1.30Full Range -3.5 to 5.7percentage of actual to predicted FCV
Change From Baseline in Percent Forced Vital Capacity (% FVC) at Week 52Nemolizumab-0.35Full Range -6.4 to 5.7percentage of actual to predicted FCV
Change From Baseline in Percent Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (%DLco) at Week 24Nemolizumab0.55Full Range -4.5 to 8.8percentage of actual to predicted DLco
Change From Baseline in Percent Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (%DLco) at Week 52Nemolizumab-3Full Range -6.6 to 4.4percentage of actual to predicted DLco
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment at Week 24Nemolizumab-3.30Full Range -5.4 to -0.9scores on scale
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment at Week 52Nemolizumab-3.10Full Range -6.5 to -0.6scores on scale

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDNemolizumab6
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNemolizumab6
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNemolizumab0

Adverse events15

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsNemolizumab36
otherAdenoviral conjunctivitisInfections and infestationsNemolizumab16
otherGastroenteritisInfections and infestationsNemolizumab16
otherParonychiaInfections and infestationsNemolizumab16
otherTinea pedisInfections and infestationsNemolizumab16
otherOral herpesInfections and infestationsNemolizumab16
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsNemolizumab16
otherAnimal biteInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsNemolizumab16
otherLigament sprainInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsNemolizumab16
otherVaccination complicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsNemolizumab16

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityNemolizumab06
Total, other adverse eventsNemolizumab66
Total, serious adverse eventsNemolizumab06

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05214794

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05214794/registered