ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05295459

Efficacy and Safety of LYR-210 for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Adults (ENLIGHTEN 2)

NCT05295459, Phase 3, Completed, Lyra Therapeutics; results first posted 2026-02-19

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of LYR-210 for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Adults (ENLIGHTEN 2). Trials, record NCT05295459. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05295459

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of LYR-210 for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Adults (ENLIGHTEN 2)
NCT number
NCT05295459
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
182 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Lyra Therapeutics
Conditions
Chronic Sinusitis, Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis)
Interventions
LYR-210, Sham procedure control, Background therapy
First posted
2022-03-25
Last updated
2026-02-19
Results first posted
2026-02-19
Limitations and caveats
Due to the nature of the procedure, the treating Investigator/surgeon was not blinded to the treatment assignment. Efforts were made to keep the study coordinator and other study staff blinded.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline (CFBL) in the 7-day Average Composite Score of 3 Cardinal Symptoms (3CS) in Participants Without Nasal PolypsWeek 24
The 3CS are nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion, anterior/posterior nasal discharge, and facial pain/pressure. The diary is completed daily by study participants throughout the study. Each symptom is rated on a 4-point (0-3) scale where 0= none/absent symptoms, 1=mild symptoms, 2=moderate symptoms, and 3=severe symptoms. The composite score of 3CS is the sum of the three cardinal symptom scores. The 3CS total score ranges from 0-9, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.
SecondaryCFBL in the 7-day Average Composite Score of 3CS in All Participants at Week 24Week 24
The 3CS are nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion, anterior/posterior nasal discharge, and facial pain/pressure. The diary is completed daily by study participants throughout the study. Each symptom is rated on a 4-point (0-3) scale where 0= none/absent symptoms, 1=mild symptoms, 2=moderate symptoms, and 3=severe symptoms. The composite score of 3CS is the sum of the three cardinal symptom scores. The 3CS total score ranges from 0-9, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.
SecondaryCFBL in the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Total Score at Week 24Week 24
The SNOT-22 questionnaire is a 22-item disease-specific quality of life instrument. Each symptom is scored on a 6-point scale where 0 = no problem and 5 = problem as bad as it can be. The total SNOT-22 score is the sum of the 22 items and can range from 0 to 110 with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.
SecondaryCFBL in the 3-D Volumetric CT Score at Week 20Week 20
Change from baseline in the percent opacification of the bilateral anterior and posterior ethmoids at Week 20, as determined by 3-D volumetric CT analysis. 3-D volumetric scoring involves evaluations of each slice of 3-D coronal CT sequences and summing of all the slices to create a volumetric score ranging from 0% to 100%. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement from Baseline.
SecondaryRescue Treatment Requirement Through Week 24Week 24Number and percent of participants requiring rescue treatment (systemic corticosteroid for any reason or participants that were recommended/underwent sinonasal surgery) through Week 24.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline (CFBL) in the 7-day Average Composite Score of 3 Cardinal Symptoms (3CS) in Participants Without Nasal PolypsWeek 24ITT Analysis Set Without Nasal PolypsChange from Baseline in 3CS ScoreLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYCFBL in the 7-day Average Composite Score of 3CS in All Participants at Week 24Week 24ITT Analysis SetChange from Baseline in 3CS ScoreLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYCFBL in the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Total Score at Week 24Week 24ITT Analysis SetChange from Baseline in SNOT-22 ScoreLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYCFBL in the 3-D Volumetric CT Score at Week 20Week 20ITT Analysis SetPercent ethmoid opacificationLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYRescue Treatment Requirement Through Week 24Week 24ITT Analysis SetParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group10

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline (CFBL) in the 7-day Average Composite Score of 3 Cardinal Symptoms (3CS) in Participants Without Nasal PolypsLYR-210-2.73Standard Error 0.239Change from Baseline in 3CS Score
Change From Baseline (CFBL) in the 7-day Average Composite Score of 3 Cardinal Symptoms (3CS) in Participants Without Nasal PolypsSham Procedure Control-1.61Standard Error 0.332Change from Baseline in 3CS Score
CFBL in the 7-day Average Composite Score of 3CS in All Participants at Week 24LYR-210-2.62Standard Error 0.229Change from Baseline in 3CS Score
CFBL in the 7-day Average Composite Score of 3CS in All Participants at Week 24Sham Procedure Control-1.72Standard Error 0.305Change from Baseline in 3CS Score
CFBL in the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Total Score at Week 24LYR-210-22.4Standard Error 2.05Change from Baseline in SNOT-22 Score
CFBL in the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Total Score at Week 24Sham Procedure Control-13.7Standard Error 2.61Change from Baseline in SNOT-22 Score
CFBL in the 3-D Volumetric CT Score at Week 20LYR-210-2.70Standard Error 0.962Percent ethmoid opacification
CFBL in the 3-D Volumetric CT Score at Week 20Sham Procedure Control-0.55Standard Error 1.271Percent ethmoid opacification
Rescue Treatment Requirement Through Week 24LYR-21012Participants
Rescue Treatment Requirement Through Week 24Sham Procedure Control7Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLYR-210121
Overall StudySTARTEDSham Procedure Control61
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLYR-21099
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSham Procedure Control58
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLYR-21022
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSham Procedure Control3

Adverse events20

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAcute sinusitisInfections and infestationsLYR-2101011212
otherAcute sinusitisInfections and infestationsSham Procedure Control2603
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsLYR-21051125
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsSham Procedure Control4604
otherChronic sinusitisInfections and infestationsLYR-210811210
otherChronic sinusitisInfections and infestationsSham Procedure Control6608
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsLYR-21071128
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsSham Procedure Control4604
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsLYR-2101011211
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsSham Procedure Control5605

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLYR-2100112
Total, all-cause mortalitySham Procedure Control060
Total, other adverse eventsLYR-21048112
Total, other adverse eventsSham Procedure Control1760
Total, serious adverse eventsLYR-2102112
Total, serious adverse eventsSham Procedure Control060

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
LYR-210 vs Sham Procedure Control: Rescue Treatment Requirement Through Week 24Trial comparisons
LYR-210 vs Sham Procedure Control: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
LYR-210 vs Sham Procedure Control: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05295459

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05295459/registered