ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05295732

The ASCEND Study: Evaluating TMB-001 in the Treatment of RXLI or ARCI Ichthyosis

NCT05295732, Phase 3, Completed, LEO Pharma; results first posted 2025-11-17

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. The ASCEND Study: Evaluating TMB-001 in the Treatment of RXLI or ARCI Ichthyosis. Trials, record NCT05295732. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05295732

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
The ASCEND Study: Evaluating TMB-001 in the Treatment of RXLI or ARCI Ichthyosis
NCT number
NCT05295732
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
153 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
LEO Pharma
Conditions
Ichthyosis
Interventions
TMB-001, Matching Vehicle
First posted
2022-03-25
Last updated
2026-05-22
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2022-000459-35
Results first posted
2025-11-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes31

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score12 weeks
Comparison of proportions of subjects in percentages with ≥2-point changes from Baseline in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA)-scaling and fissuring scores in the Treatment Area at Week 12 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. Investigator's Global Assessment Score is a 0-4 scale, where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With IGA Scores12 weeks
Comparison of proportion of subjects in percentages with IGA scores of clear or almost clear at Week 12 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. Investigator's Global Assessment Score is a 0-4 scale, where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
SecondaryChange in IGA-scaling Severity Sub-score12 weeks
Comparison of proportion of subjects in percentages who achieve IGA-scaling severity sub-score improvement ≥ 2-points from Baseline to Week 12 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. Investigator's Global Assessment Score is a 0-4 scale, where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
SecondaryChange in Worst Itch-Quality of Life (QoL) Scores12 weeks
Comparison of proportion of subjects in percentages with ≥4-point improvement from baseline in Worst Itch-QoL scores at Week 12 in subjects with baseline WI-NRS of ≥7 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. Itch-Numeric Rating Scale (I-NRS) and Worst Itch-Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) is an 0-10 scale where 0 is "no itching" and 10 is "worst itch imaginable".
SecondaryChange in Visual Index of Ichthyosis Severity (VIIS) Score12 weeks
Comparison of proportion of subjects in percentages who achieve 50% reduction from Baseline in VIIS-scaling scores at Week 12 in all areas with Baseline VIIS score ≥3 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. Visual Index for Ichthyosis Severity Score is a 0-4 scale where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
SecondaryChange in VIIS Score12 weeks
Comparison of proportion of subjects in percentages who achieve 25% reduction from Baseline in VIIS-scaling scores at Week 12 in all areas with Baseline VIIS score ≥3 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. Visual Index for Ichthyosis Severity Score is a 0-4 scale where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
SecondaryChange in IGA-fissuring Severity Sub-scores12 weeks
Comparison of proportion of subjects in percentages achieving ≥2 point improvement in IGA-fissuring severity sub-scores from Baseline to Week 12 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. Investigator's Global Assessment Score is a 0-4 scale, where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
SecondaryChange in IGA Score24 weeks
Comparison of proportions of subjects in percentages achieving ≥2-point improvement from Baseline in IGA scores at Week 24 between subjects randomized to TMB-001 0.05% BID and QD maintenance dosing. Investigator's Global Assessment Score is a 0-4 scale, where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
SecondaryChange in VIIS Score24 weeks
Comparison of proportion of subjects in percentages who achieve 50% reduction from Baseline in VIIS-scaling scores at Week 24 in all areas with Baseline VIIS score ≥3 between subjects randomized to TMB-001 0.05% BID and QD maintenance dosing. Visual Index for Ichthyosis Severity Score is a 0-4 scale where 0 is clear and 4 is severe.
SecondaryChange in Ichthyosis Quality of Life (IQoL)-32 Scores12 weeks
Comparison of proportions of subjects in percentages with ≥11-point changes from Baseline in IQOL-32 scores at Week 12 between TMB-001 0.05% and vehicle-treated subjects. The IQoL-32 is a questionnaire containing 32, each scored from 0 to 4 ('not applicable', 'not at all', 'a little', 'a lot', 'tremendously') for a total score that varies between 0 and 128. A higher score, the higher impact on quality of life.

Outcomes31

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score12 weeks
For the primary efficacy endpoint, missing Week 12 IGA scores were imputed by a multiple imputation approach and IGA responder status was derived from the imputed values. The analysis was then performed on each of the 50 imputed datasets. The final proportion of responders is the average proportion across all 50 imputed datasets hence the proportion is not an exact fraction of the total number of subjects.
percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With IGA Scores12 weeks
Missing values were imputed by a multiple imputation approach and the final proportion of responders is the average proportion across all imputed datasets, hence the proportion is not an exact fraction of the total number of subjects.
percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in IGA-scaling Severity Sub-score12 weeks
Data is not available for 3 participants in the TMB-001 0.05% group and for 2 participants in the vehicle group. Missing values were imputed by a multiple imputation approach and the final proportion of responders is the average proportion across all imputed datasets, hence the proportion is not an exact fraction of the total number of subjects.
percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Worst Itch-Quality of Life (QoL) Scores12 weeks
Data is not available for 59 participants in the TMB-001 0.05% group and for 29 participants in the vehicle group. Missing values were imputed by a multiple imputation approach and the final proportion of responders is the average proportion across all imputed datasets, hence the proportion is not an exact fraction of the total number of subjects.
percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Visual Index of Ichthyosis Severity (VIIS) Score12 weeks
Data is not available for 4 participants in the TMB-001 0.05% group. Missing values were imputed by a multiple imputation approach and the final proportion of responders is the average proportion across all imputed datasets, hence the proportion is not an exact fraction of the total number of subjects.
percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in VIIS Score12 weeks
Data is not available for 4 participants in the TMB-001 0.05% group. Missing values were imputed by a multiple imputation approach and the final proportion of responders is the average proportion across all imputed datasets, hence the proportion is not an exact fraction of the total number of subjects.
percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in IGA-fissuring Severity Sub-scores12 weeks
Data is not available for 48 participants in the TMB-001 0.05% group and for 21 participants in the vehicle group. Missing values were imputed by a multiple imputation approach and the final proportion of responders is the average proportion across all imputed datasets, hence the proportion is not an exact fraction of the total number of subjects.
percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in IGA Score24 weeks
Data reported for the re-randomized TMB-001 0.05% responders subjects in TMB-001 0.05% BID group. Missing values were imputed by a multiple imputation approach and the final proportion of responders is the average proportion across all imputed datasets, hence the proportion is not an exact fraction of the total number of subjects.
percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in VIIS Score24 weeks
Data reported for the re-randomized TMB-001 0.05% responders subjects in TMB-001 0.05% BID group. Missing values were imputed by a multiple imputation approach and the final proportion of responders is the average proportion across all imputed datasets, hence the proportion is not an exact fraction of the total number of subjects.
percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Ichthyosis Quality of Life (IQoL)-32 Scores12 weeksData is not available for 44 participants in the TMB-001 0.05% group and for 17 participants in the vehicle group.percentage of respondersNUMBER

Results by group76

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) ScoreTMB-001 0.05%41.4percentage of responders
Change in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) ScoreVehicle44.9percentage of responders
Number of Subjects With IGA ScoresTMB-001 0.05%35.8percentage of responders
Number of Subjects With IGA ScoresVehicle38.9percentage of responders
Change in IGA-scaling Severity Sub-scoreTMB-001 0.05%40.4percentage of responders
Change in IGA-scaling Severity Sub-scoreVehicle36.4percentage of responders
Change in Worst Itch-Quality of Life (QoL) ScoresTMB-001 0.05%54.4percentage of responders
Change in Worst Itch-Quality of Life (QoL) ScoresVehicle68.7percentage of responders
Change in Visual Index of Ichthyosis Severity (VIIS) ScoreTMB-001 0.05%47.2percentage of responders
Change in Visual Index of Ichthyosis Severity (VIIS) ScoreVehicle42.7percentage of responders

Participant flow35

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Phase 3: Double-blind / MUsT: TreatmentSTARTEDTMB-001 0.05%79
Phase 3: Double-blind / MUsT: TreatmentSTARTEDVehicle40
Phase 3: Double-blind / MUsT: TreatmentSTARTEDTMB-001 0.05% QD0
Phase 3: Double-blind / MUsT: TreatmentSTARTEDTMB-001 0.05% BID0
Phase 3: Double-blind / MUsT: TreatmentSTARTEDMaximal Use34
Phase 3: Double-blind / MUsT: TreatmentDosedTMB-001 0.05%78
Phase 3: Double-blind / MUsT: TreatmentDosedVehicle38
Phase 3: Double-blind / MUsT: TreatmentDosedTMB-001 0.05% QD0
Phase 3: Double-blind / MUsT: TreatmentDosedTMB-001 0.05% BID0
Phase 3: Double-blind / MUsT: TreatmentDosedMaximal Use34

Adverse events80

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherApplication site dermatitisGeneral disordersDouble-blinded Phase: TMB-001 0.05%1781
otherApplication site dermatitisGeneral disordersDouble-blinded Phase: Vehicle0380
otherApplication site dermatitisGeneral disordersOpen-label Phase: TMB-001 0.05% QD1281
otherApplication site dermatitisGeneral disordersOpen-label Phase: TMB-001 0.05% BID2382
otherApplication site dermatitisGeneral disordersMaximal Use1341
otherApplication site erosionGeneral disordersDouble-blinded Phase: TMB-001 0.05%147818
otherApplication site erosionGeneral disordersDouble-blinded Phase: Vehicle2382
otherApplication site erosionGeneral disordersOpen-label Phase: TMB-001 0.05% QD0280
otherApplication site erosionGeneral disordersOpen-label Phase: TMB-001 0.05% BID4388
otherApplication site erosionGeneral disordersMaximal Use7347

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-blinded Phase: TMB-001 0.05%078
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-blinded Phase: Vehicle038
Total, all-cause mortalityOpen-label Phase: TMB-001 0.05% QD028
Total, all-cause mortalityOpen-label Phase: TMB-001 0.05% BID038
Total, all-cause mortalityMaximal Use034
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-blinded Phase: TMB-001 0.05%4778
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-blinded Phase: Vehicle1738
Total, other adverse eventsOpen-label Phase: TMB-001 0.05% QD1128
Total, other adverse eventsOpen-label Phase: TMB-001 0.05% BID1438
Total, other adverse eventsMaximal Use2234

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
41406959BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05295732

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05295732/registered?page=2