Trial ยท NCT05310071
A Study to Verify the Clinical Benefit of Aducanumab in Participants With Early Alzheimer's Disease
NCT05310071, Phase 3, Terminated, Biogen; results first posted 2025-04-23
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. A Study to Verify the Clinical Benefit of Aducanumab in Participants With Early Alzheimer's Disease. Trials, record NCT05310071. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05310071
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- A Study to Verify the Clinical Benefit of Aducanumab in Participants With Early Alzheimer's Disease
- NCT number
- NCT05310071
- Status
- Terminated
- Phases
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 1,027 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Biogen
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Interventions
- Aducanumab, Placebo
- First posted
- 2022-04-04
- Last updated
- 2025-04-23
- Other registries' IDs
- eudract:2022-001671-14
- Results first posted
- 2025-04-23
- Limitations and caveats
- The study was terminated prematurely based on the sponsor's decision.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes10
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 78 | Baseline, Week 78 | The Clinical Dementia Rate Scale integrates assessments from 3 domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem-solving) and 3 domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care). Following the caregiver interview and systematic participant examination, the rater assigns a score describing the participant's current performance level in each of these domains of life functioning. The "Sum of boxes" scoring methodology sums the score for each of the 6 domains and provides a value ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. A positive change from baseline indicates greater impairment. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | The iADRS composite captures a decline in both cognition and daily function. It is a simple linear combination of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale, cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog13), and the Alzheimer's disease cooperative study scale for activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI). The ADAS-Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85 (higher scores indicate worse performance) and the ADCS-ADL-MCI scale ranges from 0 to 53 (higher scores indicate greater independent, healthy functioning). The total score for iADRS scale ranges from 0 to 138, where higher scores indicate better performance. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study for Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | The ADCS-ADL-MCI scale consists of 17 instrumental items (e.g., shopping, preparing meals, using household appliances, etc) and 1 basic item (getting dressed). Ratings reflect caregiver observations about the participant's actual functioning over the previous month and provide an assessment of change in the functional state of the participant over time. The total score ranges from 0 to 53. Higher scores indicate greater independent, healthy functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates healthy functioning while a negative change from baseline indicates a decline in independent functioning. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | ADAS-Cog13 comprises both cognitive tasks and clinical ratings of cognitive performance. The cognitive subscale items capture word recall, ability to follow commands, the ability to correctly copy or draw an image, naming, the ability to interact with everyday objects, orientation, word recognition, memory, comprehension of spoken language, word-finding, and language ability, with a measure for delayed word recall and concentration/distractibility. The total score ranges from 0 to 85. Higher scores indicate worse performance. A positive change from baseline indicates decline in cognitive performance. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | The MMSE scale is a performance-based test of global cognitive status. It consists of 11 tasks that assess orientation, word recall, attention and calculation, language abilities, and visuospatial functions. The scores from the 11 tests are combined to obtain the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better performance. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in cognitive performance. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | The NPI-10 is a questionnaire administered to the informant, designed to obtain information on the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms and behaviors in a participant with Alzheimer's disease. Ten areas are assessed: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability and aberrant motor behavior. The NPI total score ranges from 0 to 120. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (symptom reduction). |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Signal at Weeks 78 and 104 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 104 | Amyloid PET scan assesses cerebral amyloid load using radiotracers which is standardized into centiloids. Centiloid values on centiloid scale is based on mean composite standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR). |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Tau PET Signal at Weeks 78 and 104 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 104 | The cerebral tau level was measured by tau PET imaging. Tau PET imaging was conducted using radiotracer. SUVR is a ratio of PET uptake measured in brain region of interest and a disease-free reference region. A higher SUVR is an indication of increased PET radiotracer uptake and worsening disease. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Week 106 | Baseline, Week 106 | The CDR integrates assessments from 3 domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem-solving) and 3 domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care). Following caregiver interview and systematic participant examination, the rater assigns a score describing the participant's current performance level in each of these domains of life functioning. The CDR-SB sums the score for each of the 6 domains and provides a value ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. Positive change from baseline indicates greater impairment. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Global Statistical Test (GST) Composite Z-Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | GST z-score is an average of z-scores of CDR-SB, ADASCog13 and ADCS-ADL-MCI. CDR-SB assesses 3 cognitive (memory,orientation, judgment/problem-solving)and 3 functional(community affairs,home/hobbies,personal care) domains. Sum of Boxes method combines scores across 6 domains, ranging from 0-18(higher scores=greater impairment). ADAS-Cog13 evaluates cognitive tasks like word recall, naming, orientation and memory, with scores from 0-85 (higher scores=worse performance). ADCS-ADL-MCI rates 17 tasks (e.g.,shopping, preparing meal) and 1 basic task(dressing) with scores from 0-53 (higher scores=greater independence/healthy functioning). z-score\>0 indicates greater impairment/worse performance for CDR-SB and ADASCog13 scales and improved functioning for ADCS-ADL-MCI. For ADCS-ADL-MCI, z-score were reversed (new reversed value=original value-1) to make interpretation consistent. The GST z-score of 0 indicates population mean and score\>0 indicate greater impairment/worse performance. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes10
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 78 | Baseline, Week 78 | FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. | score on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination. | score on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study for Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination. | score on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination. | score on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination. | score on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination. | score on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Signal at Weeks 78 and 104 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 104 | FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Due to the decision of early termination, only one participant had an amyloid scan at week 78 and data was reported below. In addition, the assessment planned for Week 104 was not performed due to early termination. | SUVR | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Tau PET Signal at Weeks 78 and 104 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 104 | FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Due to decision of early termination, the Tau PET scan was not performed in any participant at scheduled visits of Weeks 78 and 104. | ||
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score at Week 106 | Baseline, Week 106 | Assessment was planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination. | ||
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Global Statistical Test (GST) Composite Z-Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Baseline, Weeks 78 and 106 | FAS included all randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (aducanumab or placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies the number of participants available for outcome measure analysis. Assessment was also planned for Week 106 for this outcome measure, but no assessments were conducted at Week 106 due to early termination. | z-score | MEAN |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Results by group15
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 78 | Placebo | 0.67 | Standard Deviation 0.408 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 78 | Aducanumab | 1.56 | Standard Deviation 1.635 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Placebo | -14.667 | Standard Deviation 4.4869 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline in Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Aducanumab | -7.796 | Standard Deviation 6.7805 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study for Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Placebo | -5.0 | Standard Deviation 3.61 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study for Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Aducanumab | -0.4 | Standard Deviation 7.60 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) at Weeks 78 and 106 | Placebo | 9.667 | Standard Deviation 0.8844 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13) at Weeks 78 and 106 | Aducanumab | 7.396 | Standard Deviation 2.3262 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Placebo | -6.0 | Standard Deviation 1.00 | score on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scale Score at Weeks 78 and 106 | Aducanumab | -1.2 | Standard Deviation 1.48 | score on a scale |
1 to 10 of 15Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 15 results by groupParticipant flow6
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Placebo | 344 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Aducanumab | 680 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Placebo | 0 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Aducanumab | 0 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Placebo | 344 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Aducanumab | 680 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Adverse events170
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Covid-19 | Infections and infestations | Placebo | 19 | 343 | |
| other | Covid-19 | Infections and infestations | Aducanumab | 49 | 681 | |
| other | Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | Placebo | 26 | 343 | |
| other | Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | Aducanumab | 42 | 681 | |
| other | Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Placebo | 32 | 343 | |
| other | Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Aducanumab | 55 | 681 | |
| other | Amyloid related imaging abnormality-microhaemorrhages and haemosiderin deposits | Nervous system disorders | Placebo | 34 | 343 | |
| other | Amyloid related imaging abnormality-microhaemorrhages and haemosiderin deposits | Nervous system disorders | Aducanumab | 167 | 681 | |
| other | Amyloid related imaging abnormality-oedema/effusion | Nervous system disorders | Placebo | 8 | 343 | |
| other | Amyloid related imaging abnormality-oedema/effusion | Nervous system disorders | Aducanumab | 159 | 681 |
1 to 10 of 170Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 170 adverse eventsAdverse event totals6
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Placebo | 0 | 343 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Aducanumab | 3 | 681 |
| Total, other adverse events | Placebo | 127 | 343 |
| Total, other adverse events | Aducanumab | 359 | 681 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Placebo | 23 | 343 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Aducanumab | 59 | 681 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons2
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison | Source |
|---|---|
| Aducanumab vs Placebo: deaths from any cause | Trial comparisons |
| Aducanumab vs Placebo: serious adverse events | Trial comparisons |
Tests1
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
| Test | Named as |
|---|---|
| Delayed Recall Module | Secondary outcome |
Source ConductCognition
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05310071
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05310071/events?page=2