ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Improvement of Planning Skills in Children and Adolescents With ADHD Through a Virtual Reality System: CogFun-RV

NCT05368324, Not applicable, Unknown, Universidad de Granada

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleImprovement of Planning Skills in Children and Adolescents With ADHD Through a Virtual Reality System: CogFun-RVClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT05368324ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusUnknownClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment82 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorUniversidad de GranadaClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsADHDClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsCogFun-RVClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2022-05-10ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2022-05-20ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryWeiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Form for assessing ADHDAfter the Intervention (12 weeks)
The Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale- Parent Form (WFIRS-P) is a 50-item scale that assesses functional impairment on six clinically relevant domains typically affected in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryWeiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Form for assessing ADHDAt 3 months
The Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale Parent Form (WFIRS-P) is a 50-item scale that assesses functional impairment on six clinically relevant domains typically affected in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryWeiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Form for assessing ADHDAt 6 months
The Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale- Parent Form (WFIRS-P) is a 50-item scale that assesses functional impairment on six clinically relevant domains typically affected in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimarySelf-assessment of daily time management in children (TIME-S)After the intervention: 12 weeksSelf-assessment for children with disabilities ages 10-17 ability of time perception, time orientation andknowledge on time management in children 10-17 years oldClinicalTrials.gov
PrimarySelf-assessment of daily time management in children (TIME-S)At 3 monthsSelf-assessment for children with disabilities ages 10-17 ability of time perception, time orientation andknowledge on time management in children 10-17 years oldClinicalTrials.gov
PrimarySelf-assessment of daily time management in children (TIME-S)At 6 monthsSelf-assessment for children with disabilities ages 10-17 ability of time perception, time orientation andknowledge on time management in children 10-17 years oldClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryAssessment of Executive Function and Sensory Processing (EPYFEI)Before and after the intervention (12 weeks)Questionnaire for parent.Scores above 46.5 points indicate that there is a deficit in executive functioning in daily life. The higher the score, the worse the result.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryConners Behavior Questionnaire for Parents (SNAP-IV)Before and after the intervention (12 weeks)Behavior scale for children and adolescents with ADHD. Higher score mean worse outcome.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryZoo Map SubtestBefore and after the intervention (12 weeks)Planning Skills Cognitive Test.The number of errors is scored, the higher the score, the worse the results. The scores are between 0 and 10.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryStroop TestBefore and after the intervention (12 weeks)
Cognitive test of selective attention and interference inhibition.The score can be positive or negative. If the score is negative, below zero, it indicates that there are difficulties in inhibiting interference from the environment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTrail Making TestBefore and after the intervention (12 weeks)
Cognitive test of sustained and alternating attention.The number of errors and the time it takes to complete the task are collected. Scores vary by age. The higher the number of errors and the longer the execution time, the worse the attention.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryDigit testBefore and after the intervention (12 weeks)Attentional Span and Working Memory.The higher the score, the better the results. Normal scores range between 6 and 9 digits of attention span.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryEmotional intelligence scale EQ-i:YvBefore and after the intervention (12 weeks)Emotional intelligence scale for children and young people.The higher the score, the better the results. The average scores are between 90-100 points.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryStrengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)-parentsBefore and after the intervention (12 weeks)Assessment of behavioural problems.The minimum score is 0 and the maximum is 40. The normal score is between 0-13 points. A score greater than 17 was considered abnormal.ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 3

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test ASecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test BSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)