ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

The Study on Effects of Acute Exposure to High Altitude Hypoxia on Cognitive Function in Lowlanders

NCT05411185, Completed, Xijing Hospital

Trial 8

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleThe Study on Effects of Acute Exposure to High Altitude Hypoxia on Cognitive Function in LowlandersClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT05411185ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment43 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorXijing HospitalClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsCognitionClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2022-06-09ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2024-10-15ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryCognitive impairment after an altitude of 3,800 meters7 days
To assess cognitive function, we used CNS Vital Signs Neurocognitive test. The core CNS Vital Signs "BRIEF-CORE" neurocognitive assessment battery consists of seven subtests: Verbal Memory (VBM), Visual Memory (VIM), Finger Tapping (FTT), Symbol Digit Coding (SDC), Stroop Test (ST), Rat Attention Test (SAT) and the Continuous Performance Test (CPT). Based on the above 7 test results, the quantitative evaluation results of 11 cognitive functions, including complex memory, graphic memory, vocabulary memory, psychomotor speed, motor speed, processing speed, reaction time, cognitive flexibility, executive function, complex attention and simple attention, were generated. By comparing the cognitive function at different stages before and after entering the plateau, we will find out the impaired cognitive function.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryThe changing trend of cognitive function in plateau environment7 daysFor the above 12 cognitive functions, the values in plain and plateau were counted respectively, and then make a line chart to observe the change trend of different cognitive function.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChanges of the relative power values of five different EEG band7 days
To collect the EEG data, we used the ZhenTec's 32-conductivity EEG monitoring device. 32 electrodes ( Fp1、Fp2、F3、F4、Fz、FT7、FT8、FC3、FC4、FCz、Cz、TP7、TP8、CP3、CP4、Pz、Oz、C3、C4、P3、P4、O1、O2、 F7、F8、T3、T4、T5、T6) were placed according to the international 10/20 system electrode placement method, and EEG data of the subjects were collected in the quiet state for 20 min. By analyzing the collected EEG data, we can calculate the relative power values of five different EEG band (δ wave, θ wave, α wave, β wave and γ wave) under different leads. By comparing the relative power values at different stages before and after entering the plateau, we tried to look for significantly altered EEG signatures, to find its association with the impaired cognitive function.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
22580489BACKGROUNDPubMed
25660759BACKGROUNDPubMed
27262217BACKGROUNDPubMed
27733363BACKGROUNDPubMed
33995130BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 2

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Continuous Performance TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)