ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Mindfulness Training, Mental Fatigue, Endurance Performance and Neurocognitive Functions

NCT05452460, Not applicable, Completed, National Taiwan Normal University; results first posted 2025-01-30

Trial 11

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleMindfulness Training, Mental Fatigue, Endurance Performance and Neurocognitive FunctionsClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT05452460ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment53 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorNational Taiwan Normal UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsMindfulness Training, Neurocognitive Function, Sports Performance, Mental FatigueClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsMindfulness interventionClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2022-07-11ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2025-01-30ClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2025-01-30ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryInhibitory Control: Reaction TimeAfter 30-minute mental fatigue and control conditions at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)
Followed by the manipulation conditions, inhibitory control will be evaluated by a Flanker task (i.e., either mental fatigue condition or control condition). In the Flanker task, participants will be presented with five arrows and will be instructed to respond as quickly and accurately as possible to the direction where the middle arrow is pointing (i.e., left or right). Types of trials are the congruent (i.e., \> \> \> \> \>) and incongruent (i.e., \< \< \> \< \<). The reaction time (RT) and accuracy (ACC) of the incongruent trials were calculated as inhibitory control performance, and the difference between conditions was further calculated to represent a mental fatigue-related impairment of inhibitory control in pre-test and post-test.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryInhibitory Control: AccuracyAfter 30-minute mental fatigue and control conditions at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)
Followed by the manipulation conditions, inhibitory control will be evaluated by a Flanker task (i.e., either mental fatigue condition or control condition). In the Flanker task, participants will be presented with five arrows and will be instructed to respond as quickly and accurately as possible to the direction where the middle arrow is pointing (i.e., left or right). Types of trials are the congruent (i.e., \> \> \> \> \>) and incongruent (i.e., \< \< \> \< \<). The reaction time (RT) and accuracy (ACC) of the incongruent trials were calculated as inhibitory control performance, and the difference between conditions was further calculated to represent a mental fatigue-related impairment of inhibitory control in pre-test and post-test.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryERP: N2After 30-minute mental fatigue and control conditions at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)
The neuroelectrical activities (i.e., N2, P3) during the Flanker task were recorded and analyzed using the Neuroscan system. The difference in neuroelectrical activities between conditions (i.e., mental fatigue condition \& control condition) were calculated as mental fatigue-related impairment in neuroelectrical markers of inhibitory control.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryERP: P3After 30-minute mental fatigue and control conditions at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)
The neuroelectrical activities (i.e., N2, P3) during the Flanker task were recorded and analyzed using the Neuroscan system. The difference in neuroelectrical activities between conditions (i.e., mental fatigue condition \& control condition) were calculated as mental fatigue-related impairment in neuroelectrical markers of inhibitory control.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryEndurance Performance: Time to ExhaustionAfter 30-minute mental fatigue and control conditions at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)
The graded exercise test (GXT) on treadmill was used to assess participant's endurance performance. Bruce protocol will be adopted in the test. The initial speed and grade of the GXT will be set at 2.74 km/hr with a grade of 10% and increase speed and grade every 3 min until participants are voluntarily exhausted. The time to exhaustion (TTE) was recorded as the endurance performance. The difference in TTE between conditions was further calculated (i.e., control condition minus mental fatigue condition) for both the pre-test and post-test.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryEndurance Performance: VO2maxAfter 30-minute mental fatigue and control conditions at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)
The graded exercise test (GXT) on treadmill was used to assess participant's endurance performance. Bruce protocol will be adopted in the test. The initial speed and grade of the GXT will be set at 2.74 km/hr with a grade of 10% and increase speed and grade every 3 min until participants are voluntarily exhausted. The maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) was recorded as the endurance performance. The difference in VO2max between conditions was further calculated (i.e., control condition minus mental fatigue condition) for both the pre-test and post-test.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondarySubjective Mental FatigueBefore, after 30-minute Stroop task and after Flanker task in the mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)
Both in the baseline and post-intervention, the visual analog scale for mental fatigue (VAS-MF) was used to assess changes in subjective mental fatigue before and after experimental manipulation. The scale ranges from 0 (not at all mentally fatigued) to 100 (extremely mentally fatigued).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryObjective Mental FatiguePost 30-minute mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)
Both at baseline and post-intervention, participants completed either a 30-min 100% incongruent version Stroop task (i.e., mental fatigue condition) or a 30-min 100% congruent version Stroop task (i.e., control condition). In the Stroop task, accuracy (ACC) was calculated as an index of objective mental fatigue. It is expressed as a percentage, determined by dividing the number of correct responses by the total number of responses.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryDispositional MindfulnessBaseline (pre-test) and 8 weeks (post-test)
The change in dispositional mindfulness was assessed using the 16-item (5-Likert scale) athlete mindfulness questionnaire (AMQ). The mean score range is between 1-5. Higher mean scores indicate a higher level of dispositional mindfulness.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMood State: AngerBefore, after 30-minute Stroop task in the mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)
Mood state change was determined by the difference in scores on the Brunel Mood Scale-Chinese (BRUMS-C) between before and after manipulation. The BRUMS-C contains 23 item (5-Likert scale) and is divided into six sub-scales: anger, confusion, depression, fatigue, tension, and vigour. The mean score range is between 0-4. Higher mean scores indicate a higher anger mood.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMood State: ConfusionBefore, after 30-minute Stroop task in the mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)
Mood state change was determined by the difference in scores on the Brunel Mood Scale-Chinese (BRUMS-C) between before and after manipulation. The BRUMS-C contains 23 item (5-Likert scale) and is divided into six sub-scales: anger, confusion, depression, fatigue, tension, and vigour. The mean score range is between 0-4. Higher mean scores indicate a higher confusion mood.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMood State: DepressionBefore, after 30-minute Stroop task in the mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)
Mood state change was determined by the difference in scores on the Brunel Mood Scale-Chinese (BRUMS-C) between before and after manipulation. The BRUMS-C contains 23 item (5-Likert scale) and is divided into six sub-scales: anger, confusion, depression, fatigue, tension, and vigour. The mean score range is between 0-4. Higher mean scores indicate a higher depression mood.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMood State: FatigueBefore, after 30-minute Stroop task in the mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)
Mood state change was determined by the difference in scores on the Brunel Mood Scale-Chinese (BRUMS-C) between before and after manipulation. The BRUMS-C contains 23 item (5-Likert scale) and is divided into six sub-scales: anger, confusion, depression, fatigue, tension, and vigour. The mean score range is between 0-4. Higher mean scores indicate a higher fatigue mood.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMood State: TensionBefore, after 30-minute Stroop task in the mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)
Mood state change was determined by the difference in scores on the Brunel Mood Scale-Chinese (BRUMS-C) between before and after manipulation. The BRUMS-C contains 23 item (5-Likert scale) and is divided into six sub-scales: anger, confusion, depression, fatigue, tension, and vigour. The mean score range is between 0-4. Higher mean scores indicate a higher tension mood.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMood State: VigourBefore, after 30-minute Stroop task in the mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)
Mood state change was determined by the difference in scores on the Brunel Mood Scale-Chinese (BRUMS-C) between before and after manipulation. The BRUMS-C contains 23 item (5-Likert scale) and is divided into six sub-scales: anger, confusion, depression, fatigue, tension, and vigour. The mean score range is between 0-4. Higher mean scores indicate a higher vigor mood.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPerception of Effortevery 2.5 minutes during graded exercise testDuring the graded exercise test, the perception of effort will be asked at beginning and every 2.5-min using Borg 6 to 20 scale, until the participant comes to voluntary exhaustion.ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource
PRIMARYInhibitory Control: Reaction TimeAfter 30-minute mental fatigue and control conditions at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)millisecondMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYInhibitory Control: AccuracyAfter 30-minute mental fatigue and control conditions at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)percentage of correct responseMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYERP: N2After 30-minute mental fatigue and control conditions at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)μVMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYERP: P3After 30-minute mental fatigue and control conditions at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)μVMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYEndurance Performance: Time to ExhaustionAfter 30-minute mental fatigue and control conditions at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)secondMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYEndurance Performance: VO2maxAfter 30-minute mental fatigue and control conditions at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)ml/kg/minMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYSubjective Mental FatigueBefore, after 30-minute Stroop task and after Flanker task in the mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)score on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYObjective Mental FatiguePost 30-minute mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)percentageMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYDispositional MindfulnessBaseline (pre-test) and 8 weeks (post-test)score on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYMood State: AngerBefore, after 30-minute Stroop task in the mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)score on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYMood State: ConfusionBefore, after 30-minute Stroop task in the mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)score on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYMood State: DepressionBefore, after 30-minute Stroop task in the mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)score on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYMood State: FatigueBefore, after 30-minute Stroop task in the mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)score on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYMood State: TensionBefore, after 30-minute Stroop task in the mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)score on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYMood State: VigourBefore, after 30-minute Stroop task in the mental fatigue and control condition at pre-test and post-test (8 weeks)score on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYPerception of Effortevery 2.5 minutes during graded exercise testClinicalTrials.gov

Results by group 140

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource
Inhibitory Control: Reaction TimeMindfulness Training GroupCondition difference in RT of Flanker task (pre-test)10.79Standard Deviation 57.89millisecondClinicalTrials.gov
Inhibitory Control: Reaction TimeWaitlist Control GroupCondition difference in RT of Flanker task (pre-test)5.47Standard Deviation 42.72millisecondClinicalTrials.gov
Inhibitory Control: Reaction TimeMindfulness Training GroupCondition difference in RT of Flanker task (post-test)4.11Standard Deviation 19.63millisecondClinicalTrials.gov
Inhibitory Control: Reaction TimeWaitlist Control GroupCondition difference in RT of Flanker task (post-test)-0.61Standard Deviation 19.90millisecondClinicalTrials.gov
Inhibitory Control: AccuracyMindfulness Training GroupCondition difference in ACC of Flanker task (pre-test)6.15Standard Deviation 11.79percentage of correct responseClinicalTrials.gov
Inhibitory Control: AccuracyWaitlist Control GroupCondition difference in ACC of Flanker task (pre-test)2.32Standard Deviation 11.97percentage of correct responseClinicalTrials.gov
Inhibitory Control: AccuracyMindfulness Training GroupCondition difference in ACC of Flanker task (post-test)2.60Standard Deviation 6.12percentage of correct responseClinicalTrials.gov
Inhibitory Control: AccuracyWaitlist Control GroupCondition difference in ACC of Flanker task (post-test)2.61Standard Deviation 4.83percentage of correct responseClinicalTrials.gov
ERP: N2Mindfulness Training GroupCondition difference in N2 amplitude at pre-test (incongruent trial)-1.27Standard Deviation 3.48μVClinicalTrials.gov
ERP: N2Waitlist Control GroupCondition difference in N2 amplitude at pre-test (incongruent trial)-1.14Standard Deviation 4.85μVClinicalTrials.gov
ERP: N2Mindfulness Training GroupCondition difference in N2 amplitude at post-test (incongruent trial)0.72Standard Deviation 4.07μVClinicalTrials.gov
ERP: N2Waitlist Control GroupCondition difference in N2 amplitude at post-test (incongruent trial)0.18Standard Deviation 2.58μVClinicalTrials.gov
ERP: P3Mindfulness Training GroupCondition difference in P3 amplitude at pre-test (incongruent trial)-0.28Standard Deviation 3.85μVClinicalTrials.gov
ERP: P3Waitlist Control GroupCondition difference in P3 amplitude at pre-test (incongruent trial)0.19Standard Deviation 5.23μVClinicalTrials.gov
ERP: P3Mindfulness Training GroupCondition difference in P3 amplitude at post-test (incongruent trial)0.78Standard Deviation 6.05μVClinicalTrials.gov
ERP: P3Waitlist Control GroupCondition difference in P3 amplitude at post-test (incongruent trial)-0.69Standard Deviation 5.60μVClinicalTrials.gov
Endurance Performance: Time to ExhaustionMindfulness Training GroupCondition difference in TTE at pre-test28.50Standard Deviation 32.28secondClinicalTrials.gov
Endurance Performance: Time to ExhaustionWaitlist Control GroupCondition difference in TTE at pre-test23.89Standard Deviation 36.43secondClinicalTrials.gov
Endurance Performance: Time to ExhaustionMindfulness Training GroupCondition difference in TTE at post-test-20.06Standard Deviation 33.54secondClinicalTrials.gov
Endurance Performance: Time to ExhaustionWaitlist Control GroupCondition difference in TTE at post-test13.15Standard Deviation 34.45secondClinicalTrials.gov

Participant flow 6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource
Overall StudySTARTEDMindfulness Training Group26ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudySTARTEDWaitlist Control Group27ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMindfulness Training Group22ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDWaitlist Control Group24ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMindfulness Training Group4ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDWaitlist Control Group3ClinicalTrials.gov

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource
Total, all-cause mortalityMindfulness Training Group026ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, all-cause mortalityWaitlist Control Group027ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsMindfulness Training Group026ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsWaitlist Control Group027ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsMindfulness Training Group026ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsWaitlist Control Group027ClinicalTrials.gov

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Mindfulness Training Group vs Waitlist Control Group: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Mindfulness Training Group vs Waitlist Control Group: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests 2

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Eriksen Flanker TaskPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)