ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT05576051

To Estimate the Efficacy of Treatment With TNFi as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy With MTX and Compare and Contrast Efficacy With Tofacitinib as Monotherapy and Combination Therapy in a Real World Setting.

NCT05576051, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2025-12-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. To Estimate the Efficacy of Treatment With TNFi as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy With MTX and Compare and Contrast Efficacy With Tofacitinib as Monotherapy and Combination Therapy in a Real World Setting. Trials, record NCT05576051. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05576051

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
To Estimate the Efficacy of Treatment With TNFi as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy With MTX and Compare and Contrast Efficacy With Tofacitinib as Monotherapy and Combination Therapy in a Real World Setting.
NCT number
NCT05576051
Status
Completed
Enrollment
9,159 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Interventions
patterns of use of combination therapy and monotherapy
First posted
2022-10-12
Last updated
2025-12-23
Results first posted
2025-12-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes21

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryClinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs Tofacitinib With Methotrexate (MTX)At month 6 follow up visit
CDAI was a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS); higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher scores indicated worse condition. In this outcome measure, CDAI for all and non-switchers participants was reported.
SecondaryCDAI Score at 6 Months for Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor (TNFi) Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXAt month 6 follow up visit
CDAI was a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS); higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher scores indicated worse condition. In this outcome measure, CDAI for all and non-switchers participants was reported.
SecondaryCDAI Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXAt month 6 follow up visit
CDAI was a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS); higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher scores indicated worse condition. In this outcome measure, CDAI for all and non-switchers participants was reported.
SecondaryCDAI Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Combination With MTX vs TNFi MonotherapyAt month 6 follow up visit
CDAI was a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS); higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher scores indicated worse condition. In this outcome measure, CDAI for all and non-switchers participants was reported.
SecondaryCDAI Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Combination With MTX vs TNFi Combination With MTXAt month 6 follow up visit
CDAI was a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS); higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher scores indicated worse condition. In this outcome measure, CDAI for all and non-switchers participants was reported.
SecondaryCDAI Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs TNFi MonotherapyAt month 6 follow up visit
CDAI was a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS); higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher scores indicated worse condition. In this outcome measure, CDAI for all and non-switchers participants was reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Modified American College of Rheumatology 20% (mACR20) at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs Tofacitinib With MTXAt month 6 follow up visit
mACR20 response: \>= 20 percent (%) improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 20% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsened pain) ; 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsened condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsened condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the mHAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsened function).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With mACR20 at 6 Months for TNFi Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXAt month 6 follow up visit
mACR20 response: \>= 20 percent (%) improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 20% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsened pain) ; 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsened condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsened condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the mHAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsened function).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With mACR20 at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXAt month 6 follow up visit
mACR20 response: \>= 20 percent (%) improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 20% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsened pain) ; 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsened condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsened condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the mHAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsened function).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With mACR20 at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs TNFi MonotherapyAt month 6 follow up visit
mACR20 response: \>= 20 percent (%) improvement in tender and swollen joint count and 20% improvement in 2 of the following 4 criteria: 1) participant assessment of pain (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsened pain) ; 2) participant global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsened condition); 3) physician global assessment of disease activity (scored from 0 to 100, higher scores indicated worsened condition); 4) self-assessed disability index of the mHAQ (scored from 0 to 3, higher scores indicated worsened function).

Outcomes21

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYClinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs Tofacitinib With Methotrexate (MTX)At month 6 follow up visit
Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here, Number Analyzed (n) signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYCDAI Score at 6 Months for Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor (TNFi) Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXAt month 6 follow up visit
Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here, n signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows. Due to change in planned analysis, data for TNFi initiators after 11/6/2012 combination and monotherapy arms were not evaluable for CDAI score outcome measure as CDAI score data were not available in medical records for any participant in TNFi initiators after 11/6/2012 combination and monotherapy arms.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYCDAI Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXAt month 6 follow up visit
Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYCDAI Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Combination With MTX vs TNFi MonotherapyAt month 6 follow up visit
Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYCDAI Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Combination With MTX vs TNFi Combination With MTXAt month 6 follow up visit
Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYCDAI Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs TNFi MonotherapyAt month 6 follow up visit
Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Modified American College of Rheumatology 20% (mACR20) at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs Tofacitinib With MTXAt month 6 follow up visit
Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here, Overall number of Participants Analyzed (N) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With mACR20 at 6 Months for TNFi Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXAt month 6 follow up visit
Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here, N signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Due to change in planned analysis, data for TNFi initiators after 11/6/2012 combination and monotherapy arms were not evaluable for mACR20 outcome measure as mACR20 data were not available in medical records for any participant in TNFi initiators after 11/6/2012 combination and monotherapy arms.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With mACR20 at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXAt month 6 follow up visit
Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here, Overall number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With mACR20 at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs TNFi MonotherapyAt month 6 follow up visit
Analysis population included all eligible participants whose medical records were retrieved and observed in this study. Here, Overall number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group126

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs Tofacitinib With Methotrexate (MTX)Tofacitinib Initiators CombinationAll18.1Standard Deviation 15.1Units on a scale
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs Tofacitinib With Methotrexate (MTX)Tofacitinib Initiators MonotherapyAll17Standard Deviation 13.4Units on a scale
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs Tofacitinib With Methotrexate (MTX)Tofacitinib Initiators CombinationNon-switchers16.6Standard Deviation 14.3Units on a scale
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs Tofacitinib With Methotrexate (MTX)Tofacitinib Initiators MonotherapyNon-switchers14.6Standard Deviation 11.6Units on a scale
CDAI Score at 6 Months for Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor (TNFi) Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXAll TNFi Initiators CombinationAll13.9Standard Deviation 12.5Units on a scale
CDAI Score at 6 Months for Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor (TNFi) Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXAll TNFI Initiators MonotherapyAll16.5Standard Deviation 13.8Units on a scale
CDAI Score at 6 Months for Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor (TNFi) Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXAll TNFi Initiators CombinationNon-switchers13Standard Deviation 11.8Units on a scale
CDAI Score at 6 Months for Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor (TNFi) Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXAll TNFI Initiators MonotherapyNon-switchers14.9Standard Deviation 13Units on a scale
CDAI Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXAll TNFi Initiators CombinationAll13.9Standard Deviation 12.5Units on a scale
CDAI Score at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXTofacitinib Initiators MonotherapyAll17Standard Deviation 13.4Units on a scale

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAll Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor (TNFi) Initiators Combination5,077
Overall StudySTARTEDAll TNFi Initiators Monotherapy2,275
Overall StudySTARTEDTNFi Initiators After 11/6/2012 Combination987
Overall StudySTARTEDTNFi Initiators After 11/6/2012 Monotherapy494
Overall StudySTARTEDTofacitinib Initiators Combination124
Overall StudySTARTEDTofacitinib Initiators Monotherapy202
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAll Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor (TNFi) Initiators Combination4,215
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAll TNFi Initiators Monotherapy1,724
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTNFi Initiators After 11/6/2012 Combination825
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTNFi Initiators After 11/6/2012 Monotherapy394

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals18

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAll TNFi Initiators Combination00
Total, all-cause mortalityAll TNFi Initiators Monotherapy00
Total, all-cause mortalityTNFi Initiators After 11/6/2012 Combination00
Total, all-cause mortalityTNFi Initiators After 11/6/2012 Monotherapy00
Total, all-cause mortalityTofacitinib Initiators Combination00
Total, all-cause mortalityTofacitinib Initiators Monotherapy00
Total, other adverse eventsAll TNFi Initiators Combination00
Total, other adverse eventsAll TNFi Initiators Monotherapy00
Total, other adverse eventsTNFi Initiators After 11/6/2012 Combination00
Total, other adverse eventsTNFi Initiators After 11/6/2012 Monotherapy00

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons6

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
All TNFi Initiators Combination vs Tofacitinib Initiators Monotherapy: Number of Participants With mACR20 at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXTrial comparisons
All TNFI Initiators Monotherapy vs Tofacitinib Initiators Monotherapy: Number of Participants With mACR20 at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs TNFi MonotherapyTrial comparisons
All TNFI Initiators Monotherapy vs Tofacitinib Initiators Combination: Number of Participants With mACR20 at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Combination With MTX vs TNFi MonotherapyTrial comparisons
Tofacitinib Initiators Combination vs Tofacitinib Initiators Monotherapy: Number of Participants With Modified American College of Rheumatology 20% (mACR20) at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Monotherapy vs Tofacitinib With MTX
Trial comparisons
All TNFi Initiators Combination vs Tofacitinib Initiators Combination: Number of Participants With mACR20 at 6 Months for Tofacitinib Combination With MTX vs TNFi Combination With MTXTrial comparisons
All TNFi Initiators Combination vs All TNFI Initiators Monotherapy: Number of Participants With mACR20 at 6 Months for TNFi Monotherapy vs TNFi Combination With MTXTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05576051

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05576051/registered?page=2