ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05629585

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryInvasive disease-free survival (iDFS) for Dato-DXd + durvalumab vs. ICTFrom randomisation to date of the event, up to 57 months from first subject in
iDFS is defined as time from randomisation until date of first occurrence of one of the following events: ipsilateral invasive breast tumour (local) recurrence, regional invasive breast cancer recurrence (axilla, regional lymph nodes, chest wall, and skin of ipsilateral breast), or distant recurrence (metastatic breast cancer that has either been biopsy-confirmed or clinically diagnosed as recurrent invasive breast cancer); contralateral invasive breast cancer; second primary non-breast invasive cancer (other than squamous or basal cell skin cancer); or death from any cause. iDFS will be determined based on disease recurrence per investigator assessment based on all available clinical assessments. The analysis will include all randomised participants, as randomised, regardless of whether the participant withdraws from randomised therapy or receives another anticancer therapy. The measure of interest will be the HR (hazard ratio) of iDFS for Dato-DXd + durvalumab vs ICT.
SecondaryDistant disease-free survival (DDFS) for Dato-DXd + durvalumab vs ICTFrom randomisation to date of the event, up to 57 months from first subject in
DDFS is defined as time from randomisation to date of first distant recurrence, occurrence of second primary non-breast invasive cancer, or death from any cause. DDFS is determined based on disease recurrence per investigators assessment based on all available clinical assessments. The analysis will include all randomised participants, as randomised regardless of whether the participant withdraws from randomised therapy or received another anticancer therapy. The measure of interest will be the HR (hazard ratio) of DDFS for Dato-DXd + durvalumab vs ICT.
SecondaryDDFS for Dato-DXd vs ICTFrom randomisation to date of the event, up to 57 months from first subject in
DDFS is defined as time from randomisation to date of first distant recurrence, occurrence of second primary non-breast invasive cancer, or death from any cause. DDFS is determined based on disease recurrence per investigators assessment based on all available clinical assessments. The measure of interest will be the HR (hazard ratio) of DDFS for Dato-DXd vs ICT.
SecondaryDDFS for Dato-DXd + durvalumab vs Dato-DXdFrom randomisation to date of the event, up 57 months from first subject in
DDFS is defined as time from randomisation to date of first distant recurrence, occurrence of second primary non-breast invasive cancer, or death from any cause. DDFS is determined based on disease recurrence per investigators assessment based on all available clinical assessments. The measure of interest will be the HR (hazard ratio) of DDFS for Dato-DXd + durvalumab vs Dato-DXd.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS) for Dato-DXd + durvalumab vs ICTFrom randomisation to date of death, due to any cause, up to 87 months from first subject in
OS is defined as time from randomisation until date of death due to any cause. The analysis will include all randomised participants, as randomised regardless of whether the participant withdraws from randomised therapy or received another anticancer therapy. The measure of interest will be the HR (hazard ratio) of OS for Dato-DXd + durvalumab vs ICT.
SecondaryOS for Dato-DXd vs ICTFrom randomisation to date of death, due to any cause, up to 87 months from first subject inOS is defined as time from randomisation until date of death due to any cause. The measure of interest will be the HR (hazard ratio) of OS for Dato-DXd vs ICT.
SecondaryiDFS for Dato-DXd vs ICTFrom randomisation to date of the event, up to 57 months from first subject in
iDFS is defined as time from randomisation until date of first occurrence of one of the following events: ipsilateral invasive breast tumour (local) recurrence, regional invasive breast cancer recurrence (axilla, regional lymph nodes, chest wall, and skin of ipsilateral breast), or distant recurrence (metastatic breast cancer that has either been biopsy-confirmed or clinically diagnosed as recurrent invasive breast cancer); contralateral invasive breast cancer; second primary non-breast invasive cancer (other than squamous or basal cell skin cancer); or death from any cause. iDFS will be determined based on disease recurrence per investigator assessment based on all available clinical assessments. The analysis will include all randomised participants, as randomised, regardless of whether the participant withdraws from randomised therapy or receives another anticancer therapy. The measure of interest will be the HR (hazard ratio) of iDFS for Dato-DXd vs ICT.
SecondaryiDFS for Dato-DXd + durvalumab vs Dato-DXdFrom randomisation to date of the event, up to 57 months from first subject in
iDFS is defined as time from randomisation until date of first occurrence of one of the following events: ipsilateral invasive breast tumour (local) recurrence, regional invasive breast cancer recurrence (axilla, regional lymph nodes, chest wall, and skin of ipsilateral breast), or distant recurrence (metastatic breast cancer that has either been biopsy-confirmed or clinically diagnosed as recurrent invasive breast cancer); contralateral invasive breast cancer; second primary non-breast invasive cancer (other than squamous or basal cell skin cancer); or death from any cause. The measure of interest will be the HR (hazard ratio) of iDFS for Dato-DXd + durvalumab vs Dato-DXd.
SecondaryParticipant-reported physical function in participants treated with Dato-DXd with or without durvalumab compared with ICTFrom randomisation to date of the deterioration, up to 36 months after randomisation
Time to Deterioration (TTD) and actual scores in physical function as measured by the PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 8c.TTD is defined as time from the date of randomisation to the date of deterioration. Deterioration is defined as change from baseline that reaches a clinically meaningful deterioration threshold. The analysis will include all dosed participants. The measure of interest is the HR (hazard ratio) of TTD and mean between-arm difference in physical function for Dato-DXd with or without durvalumab compared with ICT.
SecondaryParticipant-reported in GHS/QoL in participants treated with Dato-DXd with or without durvalumab compared with ICTFrom randomisation to date of the deterioration, up to 36 months after randomisation
Time to Deterioration (TTD) and actual scores in GHS/QoL as measured by the GHS/QoL scale from the EORTC IL172. TTD is defined as time from the date of randomisation to the date of deterioration. Deterioration is defined as change from baseline that reaches a clinically meaningful deterioration threshold. The analysis will include all randomised participants. The measure of interest is the HR (hazard ratio) of TTD and mean between-arm difference in GHS/QoL for Dato-DXd with or without durvalumab compared with ICT.
SecondaryParticipant-reported fatigue in participants treated with Dato-DXd with or without durvalumab compared with ICTFrom randomisation to 24 months after randomisation
Proportion of participants experiencing different levels of fatigue at 3 months (13weeks), 6 months (26 weeks), and 12 months (52 weeks) as measured by PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a. The analysis will include all dosed participants. The measure of interest will be the proportion of participants reporting different levels of fatigue.
SecondaryPharmacokinetics of Dato-DXdDay 1 of cycles 1,2,4,6,8 (Each cycle is 21 days)Concentration of Dato- DXd, total anti-TROP2 antibody, and MAAA-1181 in plasma.
SecondaryImmunogenicity of Dato-DXdDay 1 of cycles 1,2,4,6,8 (Each cycle is 21 days) and within 35 days of completion of or discontinuation of study intervention (at an average of 6 months following randomization)Presence of ADAs for Dato-DXd (confirmatory results: positive or negative; titres).
SecondaryIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability)
Randomization to final safety follow-up visit, either 90 days after last dose of study intervention for those who complete planned study intervention or 90 days after date of discontinuation for those who discontinue study intervention prematurely
Safety and tolerability will be evaluated in terms of AEs (graded by CTCAE version 5.0).

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05629585/registered