ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05638399

Denosumab vs Zoledronate After Lumbar Fusion

NCT05638399, Phase 3, Unknown, Shenzhen People's Hospital

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Denosumab vs Zoledronate After Lumbar Fusion. Trials, record NCT05638399. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05638399

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Denosumab vs Zoledronate After Lumbar Fusion
NCT number
NCT05638399
Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
100 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Shenzhen People's Hospital
Conditions
Osteopenia, Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Interventions
Denosumab 60 mg/ml [Prolia], Zoledronate
First posted
2022-12-06
Last updated
2023-02-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryLumbar bone mineral density(BMD)up to 12 monthsLumbar vertebral (L1 to L4, except the surgery segment) BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months via dual energy X-ray
PrimaryTotal hip BMDup to 12 monthsTotal hip BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months via dual-energy X-ray
PrimaryFemoral neck BMDup to 12 monthsFemoral neck BMD were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 month via dual-energy X-ray
PrimaryProcollagen type 1 n-terminal propeptide (P1NP)up to 12 monthsBone formation marker, P1NP were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months after surgery
PrimaryC-terminal cross-linked type 1 collagen terminal peptide (CTX)up to 12 monthsBone resorption marker, CTX were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 months after surgery
PrimaryVisual analog scale (VAS) backup to 12 months
The VAS score for back pain were determined at baseline, 6 and 12 month. Use a ruler about 10cm long, one side is marked with "0" and the other "10" respectively. A score of 0 indicates no pain, 10 indicates the most unbearable pain.
SecondaryThe Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaireup to 12 month
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is scored by 24 adding up the number of items checked "yes" on different low back pain-related daily activity disabilities. Total scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores 24 indicating a higher level of disability related to low back pain and lowest 0 represents no back pain.
SecondaryThe QUALEFFO-31 Questionnaireup to 12 month
The Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis-31 (QUALEFFO-31), which contains three domains including pain, physical function, and mental function. This scale is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the highest QoL and 100 the lowest.
SecondaryThe EQ-5D Questionnaireup to 12 month
The EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire evaluates health status consisting five dimensions: mobility, selfcare, performance of usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. After conversion, the index was between 0 and 1.0 (minimum score: 0, indicating worst health state; full score:1.0, indicating full health).
SecondaryNew fracture rateup to 12 month
New fracture rate containing vertebral fracture and non-vertebral fracture was assessed at 12 month after surgery. The lowest score was 0, the highest score was 100%. The lower score 0 represents no secondary fracture.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05638399

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05638399/registered