ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05643794

A Proof-of-concept Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rozanolixizumab to Treat Adult Study Participants With Severe Fibromyalgia Syndrome

NCT05643794, Phase 2, Completed, UCB Biopharma SRL; results first posted 2025-07-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Proof-of-concept Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rozanolixizumab to Treat Adult Study Participants With Severe Fibromyalgia Syndrome. Trials, record NCT05643794. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05643794

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Proof-of-concept Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rozanolixizumab to Treat Adult Study Participants With Severe Fibromyalgia Syndrome
NCT number
NCT05643794
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
63 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
UCB Biopharma SRL
Conditions
Fibromyalgia
Interventions
rozanolixizumab, Placebo
First posted
2022-12-09
Last updated
2025-07-01
Results first posted
2025-07-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryBrief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Average Interference Score at 12 Weeks of TreatmentAt 12 weeks of treatment
The BPI-SF was a self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a study participant's pain and the impact of this pain on the study participant's daily functioning. The BPI-SF assesses for the location of pain, pain intensity and functional interference from pain. The 7 BPI-SF interference items included: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work (including housework), relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Each item was rated on a 0 (did not interfere) to 10 (completely interfere) scale with a recall period of 24 hours. The BPI-SF interference score ranges 0-70. Higher scores indicated greater interference.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the StudyFrom Baseline till end of Safety Follow-up (up to Week 33)
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered related to the study medication. A TEAE was defined as any AE with an onset date on or after the first dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP) in Run-In and on or before the earliest of the following: the last date of infusion (including Run-Out) +56 days, final contact date, or death. A TEAE is also defined as any unresolved event already present before administration of treatment that worsens in intensity following exposure to the treatment.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal of IMPFrom Baseline till end of Safety Follow-up (up to Week 33)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered related to the study medication. A TEAE was defined as any AE with an onset date on or after the first dose of IMP in Run-In and on or before the earliest of the following: the last date of infusion (including Run-Out) +56 days, final contact date, or death.
SecondaryBrief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Average Interference Score at 24 Weeks of TreatmentAt 24 weeks of treatment
The BPI-SF was a self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a study participant's pain and the impact of this pain on the study participant's daily functioning. The BPI-SF assesses for the location of pain, pain intensity and functional interference from pain. The 7 BPI-SF interference items included: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work (including housework), relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Each item was rated on a 0 (did not interfere) to 10 (completely interfere) scale with a recall period of 24 hours. The BPI-SF interference score ranges 0-70. Higher scores indicated greater interference.
SecondaryRevised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) Score at 12 Weeks of TreatmentAt 12 weeks of treatment
The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) was a 21-item questionnaire with a recall period of 7 days. The FIQR included 3 domains: activities, overall impact, and symptoms. Each item was based on an 11-point numeric rating scale. The FIQR total score was calculated by taking the sum of the following: Activities domain subtotal divided by 3, overall impact" domain subtotal and symptoms domain subtotal divided by 2. The total score ranged from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the best possible condition and 100 denoting the worst possible condition. Higher scores indicated more severe impact.
SecondaryMean 7-day Average Daily Pain Score Assessed With Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 12 Weeks of TreatmentAt 12 Weeks of treatment
The Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was a scale in which a respondent selected a whole number that best described "How much pain have you experienced on average over the past 24 hours?" The 11-point Pain NRS ranged 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Mean pain scores were derived the average of the daily assessment over the past 7 days. The higher score represented worst possible pain.
SecondaryMean 7-day Fatigue Score Assessed With Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale at 12 Weeks of TreatmentAt 12 weeks of treatment
The Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was a scale in which a respondent selected a whole number that best described "How much fatigue have you experienced on average over the past 24 hours?" The 11-point Fatigue NRS ranged 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (fatigue as bad as you can imagine). Mean fatigue scores were derived the average of the daily assessment over the past 7 days. Higher score represented worst possible fatigue.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYBrief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Average Interference Score at 12 Weeks of TreatmentAt 12 weeks of treatment
Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all study participants who received any study treatment, including during the run-in period, had a baseline value and at least one post-baseline efficacy endpoint assessment.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the StudyFrom Baseline till end of Safety Follow-up (up to Week 33)The Safety Set as treated (SS-t) included all study participants who received any study treatment, including during Run-In period.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal of IMPFrom Baseline till end of Safety Follow-up (up to Week 33)The SS-t included all study participants who received any study treatment, including during Run-In period.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYBrief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Average Interference Score at 24 Weeks of TreatmentAt 24 weeks of treatment
FAS included all study participants who received any study treatment, including during the run-in period, had a baseline value and at least one post-baseline efficacy endpoint assessment. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this Outcome measure.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYRevised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) Score at 12 Weeks of TreatmentAt 12 weeks of treatmentFAS included all study participants who received any study treatment, including during the run-in period, had a baseline value and at least one post-baseline efficacy endpoint assessment.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean 7-day Average Daily Pain Score Assessed With Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 12 Weeks of TreatmentAt 12 Weeks of treatmentFAS included all study participants who received any study treatment, including during the run-in period, had a baseline value and at least one post-baseline efficacy endpoint assessment.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean 7-day Fatigue Score Assessed With Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale at 12 Weeks of TreatmentAt 12 weeks of treatmentFAS included all study participants who received any study treatment, including during the run-in period, had a baseline value and at least one post-baseline efficacy endpoint assessment.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Average Interference Score at 12 Weeks of TreatmentPlacebo (PBO)6.3095% Confidence Interval 5.59 to 7.01score on a scale
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Average Interference Score at 12 Weeks of TreatmentRLZ 12 Weeks5.7695% Confidence Interval 5.11 to 6.41score on a scale
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the StudyRun-In-PBO44Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the StudyTP1-RLZ22Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the StudyTP1-PBO41Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the StudyTP2-RLZ/RLZ18Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the StudyTP2-PBO/RLZ19Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the StudyTP2-PBO/PBO19Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the StudyRun-Out and SFU-RLZ/RLZ10Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the StudyRun-Out and SFU-PBO/RLZ12Participants

Participant flow45

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Run-In (2 Weeks)STARTEDSequence 1: RLZ 12w + RLZ 12w22
Run-In (2 Weeks)STARTEDSequence 2: PBO + RLZ 12w20
Run-In (2 Weeks)STARTEDSequence 3: PBO + PBO21
Run-In (2 Weeks)COMPLETEDSequence 1: RLZ 12w + RLZ 12w22
Run-In (2 Weeks)COMPLETEDSequence 2: PBO + RLZ 12w20
Run-In (2 Weeks)COMPLETEDSequence 3: PBO + PBO21
Run-In (2 Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDSequence 1: RLZ 12w + RLZ 12w0
Run-In (2 Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDSequence 2: PBO + RLZ 12w0
Run-In (2 Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDSequence 3: PBO + PBO0
Treatment Period 1 (12 Weeks)STARTEDSequence 1: RLZ 12w + RLZ 12w22

Adverse events828

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersRun-In-PBO4634
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersTP1-RLZ3227
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersTP1-PBO3414
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersTP2-RLZ/RLZ1182
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersTP2-PBO/RLZ7197
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersTP2-PBO/PBO1201
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersRun-Out and SFU-RLZ/RLZ0220
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersRun-Out and SFU-PBO/RLZ0200
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersRun-Out and SFU-PBO/PBO0210
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersRun-In-PBO116313

Adverse event totals27

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRun-In-PBO063
Total, all-cause mortalityTP1-RLZ022
Total, all-cause mortalityTP1-PBO041
Total, all-cause mortalityTP2-RLZ/RLZ018
Total, all-cause mortalityTP2-PBO/RLZ019
Total, all-cause mortalityTP2-PBO/PBO020
Total, all-cause mortalityRun-Out and SFU-RLZ/RLZ022
Total, all-cause mortalityRun-Out and SFU-PBO/RLZ020
Total, all-cause mortalityRun-Out and SFU-PBO/PBO021
Total, other adverse eventsRun-In-PBO2463

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
42748952DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05643794

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05643794/results?page=2