ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT05654662

A Clinical Study Investigating the Effects of a Dentifrice Containing 67% Sodium Bicarbonate When Used Twice Daily for 12 Weeks on Gingivitis Treatment and Plaque Removal

NCT05654662, Not applicable, Completed, HALEON; results first posted 2025-01-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Clinical Study Investigating the Effects of a Dentifrice Containing 67% Sodium Bicarbonate When Used Twice Daily for 12 Weeks on Gingivitis Treatment and Plaque Removal. Trials, record NCT05654662. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05654662

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Clinical Study Investigating the Effects of a Dentifrice Containing 67% Sodium Bicarbonate When Used Twice Daily for 12 Weeks on Gingivitis Treatment and Plaque Removal
NCT number
NCT05654662
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
197 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
HALEON
Conditions
Gingivitis, Dental Plaque
Interventions
Corsodyl Original Dentifrice, Colgate Cavity Protection Dentifrice
First posted
2022-12-16
Last updated
2025-01-13
Results first posted
2025-01-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
The number of bleeding sites was calculated using the bleeding index (BI) assessment. The BI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces (having two-thirds of the natural tooth surface gradable for the assessment) of the facial and lingual/palatal gingiva, 6 sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, and distobuccal; mesiolingual/palatal, lingual/palatal, and distolingual/palatal). Evaluable tooth sites were probed, and gingival bleeding was assessed for approximately 30 seconds after probing. The number of bleeding sites for each participant was calculated as the number of evaluable tooth sites with bleeding observed immediately on probing or within 30 seconds of probing. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 12. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in gingival bleeding.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 12 (Test Product Versus [vs.] Reference Product)Baseline and Week 12
The number of bleeding sites was calculated using the BI assessment. The BI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces (having two-thirds of the natural tooth surface gradable for the assessment) of the facial and lingual/palatal gingiva, 6 sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, and distobuccal; mesiolingual/palatal, lingual/palatal, and distolingual/palatal). Evaluable tooth sites were probed, and gingival bleeding was assessed for approximately 30 seconds after probing. The number of bleeding sites for each participant was calculated as the number of evaluable tooth sites with bleeding observed immediately on probing or within 30 seconds of probing. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 12. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in gingival bleeding.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 3 and Week 6Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
The number of bleeding sites was calculated using the BI assessment. The BI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces (having two-thirds of the natural tooth surface gradable for the assessment) of the facial and lingual/palatal gingiva, 6 sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, and distobuccal; mesiolingual/palatal, lingual/palatal, and distolingual/palatal). Evaluable tooth sites were probed, and gingival bleeding was assessed for approximately 30 seconds after probing. The number of bleeding sites for each participant was calculated as the number of evaluable tooth sites with bleeding observed immediately on probing or within 30 seconds of probing. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at each indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in gingival bleeding.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 3 and Week 6 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
The number of bleeding sites was calculated using the BI assessment. The BI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces (having two-thirds of the natural tooth surface gradable for the assessment) of the facial and lingual/palatal gingiva, 6 sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, and distobuccal; mesiolingual/palatal, lingual/palatal, and distolingual/palatal). Evaluable tooth sites were probed, and gingival bleeding was assessed for approximately 30 seconds after probing. The number of bleeding sites for each participant was calculated as the number of evaluable tooth sites with bleeding observed immediately on probing or within 30 seconds of probing. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at each indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in gingival bleeding.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean BI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
The BI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces (having two-thirds of the natural tooth surface gradable for the assessment) of the facial and lingual/palatal gingiva, 6 sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, and distobuccal; mesiolingual/palatal, lingual/palatal, and distolingual/palatal). Evaluable tooth sites were probed, and gingival bleeding was assessed for approximately 30 seconds after probing and scored on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 to 2, where 0=No bleeding after 30 seconds; 1=Bleeding observed within 30 seconds of probing; 2=Bleeding observed immediately on probing. Mean BI was calculated by taking the average over all tooth sites assessed for a participant. Lower score indicated better outcome. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at each indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in gingival bleeding.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean BI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
The BI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces (having two-thirds of the natural tooth surface gradable for the assessment) of the facial and lingual/palatal gingiva, 6 sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, and distobuccal; mesiolingual/palatal, lingual/palatal, and distolingual/palatal). Evaluable tooth sites were probed, and gingival bleeding was assessed for approximately 30 seconds after probing and scored on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 to 2, where 0=No bleeding after 30 seconds; 1=Bleeding observed within 30 seconds of probing; 2=Bleeding observed immediately on probing. Mean BI was calculated by taking the average over all tooth sites assessed for a participant. Lower score indicated better outcome. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at each indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in gingival bleeding.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Mean Modified Gingival Index (MGI) at Weeks 3, 6 and 12Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
MGI assessment is a non-invasive evaluation which focuses on visual symptoms of gingivitis (example, redness, texture, edema). MGI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces of facial and lingual/palatal gingiva,4 sites per tooth and scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0=Absence of inflammation;1=Mild inflammation;slight change in color,little change in color;little change in texture of any portion of marginal or papillary gingival unit;2=Mild inflammation; criteria as 1 but involving the entire marginal or papillary gingival unit;3=Moderate inflammation;glazing, redness, edema, and/or hypertrophy of marginal or papillary gingival unit;4= Severe inflammation;marked redness, edema and/or hypertrophy of marginal or papillary gingival unit,spontaneous bleeding, congestion, or ulceration. Lower score indicated better outcome. Change from Baseline=Value at each indicated timepoint minus Baseline \[Day 0\] value. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in symptoms.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean MGI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
MGI assessment is a non-invasive evaluation which focuses on visual symptoms of gingivitis (example, redness, texture, edema). MGI was assessed for all evaluable surfaces of facial and lingual/palatal gingiva,4 sites per tooth and scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0=Absence of inflammation;1=Mild inflammation;slight change in color,little change in color;little change in texture of any portion of marginal or papillary gingival unit;2=Mild inflammation; criteria as 1 but involving the entire marginal or papillary gingival unit;3=Moderate inflammation;glazing, redness, edema, and/or hypertrophy of marginal or papillary gingival unit;4= Severe inflammation;marked redness, edema and/or hypertrophy of marginal or papillary gingival unit,spontaneous bleeding, congestion, or ulceration. Lower score indicated better outcome. Change from Baseline=Value at each indicated timepoint minus Baseline \[Day 0\] value. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in symptoms.
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Overall TPI (Turesky Plaque Index) at Weeks 3, 6 and 12Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
TPI was used to assess plaque on the facial and lingual surfaces of each scorable tooth (7-7 in each arch). 3 scores were recorded facially(distal, body, mesial sites), and 3 scores were recorded lingually(distal, body, mesial sites). Plaque was first disclosed using a dye solution and scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 to 5, where 0=No plaque; 1=Separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin; 2=Thin continuous band of plaque (up to 1 millimeter\[mm\]) at the cervical margin; 3=Band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering less than (\<)1/3 of the tooth surface; 4=Plaque covering greater than or equal to (\>=)1/3 but \<2/3 of the tooth surface; 5=Plaque covering \>=2/3 of the tooth surface. Mean overall TPI score=Average of TPI values over all tooth sites assessed for a participant. Lower score=better outcome. Change from Baseline=Value at each indicated timepoint minus Baseline value. Baseline=Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement (less plaque accumulation).
SecondaryAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Overall TPI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12
TPI was used to assess plaque on the facial and lingual surfaces of each scorable tooth (7-7 in each arch). 3 scores were recorded facially (distal, body, mesial sites), and 3 scores were recorded lingually (distal, body, mesial sites). Plaque was first disclosed using a dye solution and scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 to 5, where 0=No plaque; 1=Separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin; 2=Thin continuous band of plaque (up to 1 mm) at the cervical margin; 3=Band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering \<1/3 of the tooth surface; 4=Plaque covering \>=1/3 but \<2/3 of the tooth surface; 5=Plaque covering \>=2/3 of the tooth surface. Mean overall TPI score=Average of TPI values over all tooth sites assessed for a participant. Lower score=better outcome. Change from Baseline=Value at each indicated timepoint minus Baseline value. Baseline=Day 0. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement (less plaque accumulation).

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 12Baseline and Week 12mITT Population. Here, overall number analyzed is defined as the number of participants with data available for analysis of this outcome measure.bleeding sitesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 12 (Test Product Versus [vs.] Reference Product)Baseline and Week 12mITT Population. Here, overall number analyzed is defined as the number of participants with data available for analysis of this outcome measure.bleeding sitesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 3 and Week 6Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6mITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated timepoints were analyzed.bleeding sitesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 3 and Week 6 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6mITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated timepoints were analyzed.bleeding sitesLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean BI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12mITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated timepoints were analyzed.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean BI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12mITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated timepoints were analyzed.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Mean Modified Gingival Index (MGI) at Weeks 3, 6 and 12Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12mITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated timepoints were analyzed.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean MGI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12mITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated timepoints were analyzed.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Overall TPI (Turesky Plaque Index) at Weeks 3, 6 and 12Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12mITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated timepoints were analyzed.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAdjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Overall TPI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)Baseline, Weeks 3, 6 and 12mITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated timepoints were analyzed.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group45

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 12Test Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)-4.3Standard Error 1.44bleeding sites
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 12 (Test Product Versus [vs.] Reference Product)Test Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)-4.3Standard Error 1.44bleeding sites
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 12 (Test Product Versus [vs.] Reference Product)Reference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste)2.3Standard Error 1.42bleeding sites
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 3 and Week 6Test Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)Change from Baseline at Week 3-2.4Standard Error 1.02bleeding sites
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 3 and Week 6Test Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)Change from Baseline at Week 6-2.4Standard Error 1.26bleeding sites
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 3 and Week 6 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)Test Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)Change from Baseline at Week 3-2.4Standard Error 1.02bleeding sites
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 3 and Week 6 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)Reference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste)Change from Baseline at Week 31.4Standard Error 1.02bleeding sites
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 3 and Week 6 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)Test Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)Change from Baseline at Week 6-2.4Standard Error 1.26bleeding sites
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Sites at Week 3 and Week 6 (Test Product vs. Reference Product)Reference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste)Change from Baseline at Week 62.9Standard Error 1.25bleeding sites
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Mean BI at Weeks 3, 6 and 12Test Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)Change from Baseline at Week 3-0.04Standard Error 0.008score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTest Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)94
Overall StudySTARTEDReference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste)96
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTest Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)92
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDReference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste)96
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTest Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDReference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste)0

Adverse events10

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherGINGIVAL BLEEDINGGastrointestinal disordersTest Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)094
otherGINGIVAL BLEEDINGGastrointestinal disordersReference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste)196
otherTOOTHACHEGastrointestinal disordersTest Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)094
otherTOOTHACHEGastrointestinal disordersReference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste)196
otherVOMITINGGastrointestinal disordersTest Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)094
otherVOMITINGGastrointestinal disordersReference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste)196
otherGINGIVAL INJURYInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsTest Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)294
otherGINGIVAL INJURYInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsReference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste)096
otherMIGRAINENervous system disordersTest Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)094
otherMIGRAINENervous system disordersReference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste)196

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTest Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)094
Total, all-cause mortalityReference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste)096
Total, other adverse eventsTest Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)294
Total, other adverse eventsReference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste)496
Total, serious adverse eventsTest Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste)094
Total, serious adverse eventsReference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste)096

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Test Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste) vs Reference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Test Product (Corsodyl Original Toothpaste) vs Reference Product (Colgate Cavity Protection Toothpaste): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05654662

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05654662/results?page=2