ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05678959

Long-term Extension Study of Ligelizumab in Food Allergy

NCT05678959, Phase 3, Terminated, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2025-10-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Long-term Extension Study of Ligelizumab in Food Allergy. Trials, record NCT05678959. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05678959

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Long-term Extension Study of Ligelizumab in Food Allergy
NCT number
NCT05678959
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
163 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Food Allergy
Interventions
Ligelizumab 120 mg, Ligelizumab 240 mg
First posted
2023-01-10
Last updated
2026-01-13
Results first posted
2025-10-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Up to approximately 81 weeks
TEAEs were defined as events where an AE either started after the first dose of extension study treatment and within 16 weeks after the last administered study treatment dose or began prior to the first dose of study treatment but increased in severity (based on preferred term) within 16 weeks after the last study treatment.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Tolerating a Single Dose of More Than or Equal to 600 mg of Peanut Protein Without Dose-Limiting SymptomsUp to approximately 97 weeks
Assessed during an open-label oral food challenge (OFC). If missing Week 52-OFC assessments, Week 156-OFC assessments were performed within 380 days (inclusive) after first extension dose date and considered as Week 52-OFC assessments.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With TEAEs and TESAEs, Assessed in Participants With at Least One Home Administration of Study DrugUp to approximately 81 weeks
TEAEs were defined as events where an AE either started after the first dose of extension study treatment and within 16 weeks after the last administered study treatment dose or began prior to the first dose of study treatment but increased in severity (based on preferred term) within 16 weeks after the last study treatment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Up to approximately 97 weeks
The FAQLQ-TF is a self-reported instrument designed for adolescents aged 13-17 to assess the impact of food allergy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The questionnaire includes three domains (emotional impact, allergen avoidance and dietary restrictions, and risk of accidental exposure). Each item was scored on a 7-point scale, with a higher score indicating greater impairment in HRQoL. The total score was calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. The possible range for the total score was 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the impairment in HRQoL. OFC = oral food challenge.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Up to approximately 97 weeks
The FAQLQ-AF is a self-reported instrument designed for adults aged 18-55 to assess the impact of food allergy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The questionnaire includes four domains (emotional impact, allergen avoidance and dietary restrictions, risk of accidental exposure, and food allergy-related health). Each item was scored on a 7-point scale, with a higher score indicating greater impairment in HRQoL. The total score was calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. The possible range for the total score was 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the impairment in HRQoL. OFC = oral food challenge.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)Up to approximately 97 weeks
The FAIM-TF is a self-reported instrument designed for adolescents aged 13-17. It aims to reflect the participant's perceived food allergy severity and food allergy-related risk. The questionnaire consists of six questions. The first four questions assess the participant's food allergy expectation outcomes, and the remaining two questions reflect aspects of the perceived severity of food allergy. The total score was calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. The possible range for the total score was 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring. OFC = oral food challenge.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) Adult Form (FAIM-AF)Up to approximately 97 weeks
The FAIM-AF is a self-reported instrument designed for adults aged 18-55. It aims to reflect the participant's perceived food allergy severity and food allergy-related risk. The questionnaire consists of six questions; The first four questions assess the participant's food allergy expectation outcomes, and the remaining two questions reflect aspects of the perceived severity of food allergy. The total score was calculated as the arithmetic average of all completed items. the range for each item and the total score is from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The possible range for the total score was 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum). The higher the score, the greater the perceived risk or chance of adverse events occurring. OFC = oral food challenge.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Version 2 Acute Version (SF-36v2) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)Up to approximately 97 weeks
The SF-36v2 Health Survey is a 36-item instrument that measures generic health-related quality of life. It contains 8 scales and 2 component summary indices evaluating physical, social, and emotional functioning in addition to general health perceptions and mental health. PCS and MCS scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health outcomes.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Up to approximately 81 weeksSafety Set 1 included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment during the extension study.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Tolerating a Single Dose of More Than or Equal to 600 mg of Peanut Protein Without Dose-Limiting SymptomsUp to approximately 97 weeks
The full analysis set included all participants who enrolled into the extension study without screen-failure and who received at least one dose of study treatment during any core study. Data are reported for participants who responded and had an evaluable value.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With TEAEs and TESAEs, Assessed in Participants With at Least One Home Administration of Study DrugUp to approximately 81 weeksSafety Set 1 included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment during the extension study. Number analyzed is the number of participants with available data.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Up to approximately 97 weeks
The full analysis set included all participants who enrolled into the extension study without screen-failure and who received at least one dose of study treatment during any core study. Only participants with a value at both the baseline and post-baseline visits were included.
Unit on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Adult Form (FAQLQ-AF)Up to approximately 97 weeks
The full analysis set included all participants who enrolled into the extension study without screen-failure and who received at least one dose of study treatment during any core study. Only participants with a value at both the baseline and post-baseline visits were included.
Unit on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) Teenager Form (FAIM-TF)Up to approximately 97 weeks
The full analysis set included all participants who enrolled into the extension study without screen-failure and who received at least one dose of study treatment during any core study. Only participants with a value at both the baseline and post-baseline visits were included.
Unit on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) Adult Form (FAIM-AF)Up to approximately 97 weeks
The full analysis set included all participants who enrolled into the extension study without screen-failure and who received at least one dose of study treatment during any core study. Only participants with a value at both the baseline and post-baseline visits were included.
Unit on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Version 2 Acute Version (SF-36v2) Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS)Up to approximately 97 weeks
The full analysis set included all participants who enrolled into the extension study without screen-failure and who received at least one dose of study treatment during any core study. Only participants with a value at both the baseline and post-baseline visits were included.
Unit on a scaleMEAN

Results by group19

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Ligelizumab 120 mgTEAEs84.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Ligelizumab 240 mgTEAEs69.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Ligelizumab 120 mgTESAEs3.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Ligelizumab 240 mgTESAEs2.4percentage of participants
Number of Participants Tolerating a Single Dose of More Than or Equal to 600 mg of Peanut Protein Without Dose-Limiting SymptomsLigelizumab 120 mg1Participants
Percentage of Participants With TEAEs and TESAEs, Assessed in Participants With at Least One Home Administration of Study DrugLigelizumab 120 mgTEAEs86.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With TEAEs and TESAEs, Assessed in Participants With at Least One Home Administration of Study DrugLigelizumab 240 mgTEAEs67.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With TEAEs and TESAEs, Assessed in Participants With at Least One Home Administration of Study DrugLigelizumab 120 mgTESAEs5.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With TEAEs and TESAEs, Assessed in Participants With at Least One Home Administration of Study DrugLigelizumab 240 mgTESAEs0percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in Total Scores in the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) Teenager Form (FAQLQ-TF)Ligelizumab 240 mg1.13Standard Deviation NAUnit on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLigelizumab 120 mg81
Overall StudySTARTEDLigelizumab 240 mg82
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLigelizumab 120 mg0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLigelizumab 240 mg0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLigelizumab 120 mg81
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLigelizumab 240 mg82

Adverse events52

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherInjection site erythemaGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsLigelizumab 120 mg781
otherInjection site erythemaGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsLigelizumab 240 mg1482
otherInjection site indurationGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsLigelizumab 120 mg181
otherInjection site indurationGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsLigelizumab 240 mg682
otherInjection site oedemaGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsLigelizumab 120 mg481
otherInjection site oedemaGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsLigelizumab 240 mg1182
otherInjection site swellingGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsLigelizumab 120 mg281
otherInjection site swellingGeneral disorders and administration site conditionsLigelizumab 240 mg782
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsLigelizumab 120 mg681
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsLigelizumab 240 mg782

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLigelizumab 120 mg081
Total, all-cause mortalityLigelizumab 240 mg082
Total, other adverse eventsLigelizumab 120 mg4781
Total, other adverse eventsLigelizumab 240 mg4382
Total, serious adverse eventsLigelizumab 120 mg381
Total, serious adverse eventsLigelizumab 240 mg282

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
38814736DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Ligelizumab 120 mg vs Ligelizumab 240 mg: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Ligelizumab 120 mg vs Ligelizumab 240 mg: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05678959

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05678959/events?page=2