Trial · NCT05688332
Registered outcomes14
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 14 of 14
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in mean Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels | Baseline & Week 6 | The null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide treatment groups in the change in mean HbA1c levels after 6 weeks of add-on therapy to metformin in the T2DM patients (i.e. H0: µ1 = µ2 where µ1 is the mean HbA1c change in the glibenclamide group and µ2 is the mean HbA1c change in the voglibose group). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a significant difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the change in mean HbA1c levels after 6 weeks of add-on therapy to metformin in the T2DM patients (i.e. H1: µ1 ≠ µ2). |
| Primary | Change in mean Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels | Baseline & Week 12 | The null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide treatment groups in the change in mean HbA1c levels after 12 weeks of add-on therapy to metformin in the T2DM patients (i.e. H0: µ1 = µ2 where µ1 is the mean HbA1c change in the glibenclamide group and µ2 is the mean HbA1c change in the voglibose group). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a significant difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the change in mean HbA1c levels after 12 weeks of add-on therapy to metformin in the T2DM patients (i.e. H1: µ1 ≠ µ2). |
| Secondary | Change in Glycemic control with regard to Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) | Baseline & week 6 | Differences in change in glycemic control with regard to FPG: The null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide treatment groups in the mean FPG change (i.e. H0: µ1 = µ2 where µ1 and µ2 represent the mean FPG change in the glibenclamide and voglibose groups respectively). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean changes of FPG (i.e. H1: µ1 ≠ µ2). |
| Secondary | Change in glycemic control with regard to Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) | Baseline & week 12 | Differences in change in glycemic control with regard to FPG: The null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide treatment groups in the mean FPG change (i.e. H0: µ1 = µ2 where µ1 and µ2 represent the mean FPG change in the glibenclamide and voglibose groups respectively). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean changes of FPG (i.e. H1: µ1 ≠ µ2). |
| Secondary | Change in glycemic control with regard to Post Prandial Blood Glucose (PPBG) | Baseline & week 6 | Differences in Change in glycemic control with regard to PPBG: The null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide treatment groups in the mean PPBG change (i.e. H0: µ1 = µ2 where µ1 and µ2 represent the mean PPBG change in the glibenclamide and voglibose groups respectively). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean changes of PPBG (i.e. H1: µ1 ≠ µ2). |
| Secondary | Change in glycemic control with regard to Post Prandial Blood Glucose (PPBG) | Baseline & week 12 | Differences in change in glycemic control with regard to PPBG: The null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide treatment groups in the mean PPBG change (i.e. H0: µ1 = µ2 where µ1 and µ2 represent the mean PPBG change in the glibenclamide and voglibose groups respectively). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean changes of PPBG (i.e. H1: µ1 ≠ µ2). |
| Secondary | Lipid profile (LDL-c, HDL-c, TC, TG) comparison | Baseline & Week 6 | Lipid profile (LDL-c, HDL-c, TC, TG) comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean changes in lipid profile (i.e. H0: µ1 = µ2 where µ1 and µ2 represent the mean changes in lipid profile in the glibenclamide and voglibose groups respectively). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference between voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean changes in lipid profile (i.e. H1: µ1 ≠ µ2). |
| Secondary | Lipid profile (LDL-c, HDL-c, TC, TG) comparison | Baseline & Week 12 | Lipid profile (LDL-c, HDL-c, TC, TG) comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean changes in lipid profile (i.e. H0: µ1 = µ2 where µ1 and µ2 represent the mean changes in lipid profile in the glibenclamide and voglibose groups respectively). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference between voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean changes in lipid profile (i.e. H1: µ1 ≠ µ2). |
| Secondary | Anthropometric parameter changes in BMI | Baseline & Week 6 | Anthropometric parameter changes in BMI: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean anthropometric parameter changes (i.e. H0: µ1 = µ2 where µ1 and µ2 represent the mean anthropometric parameter changes in the glibenclamide and voglibose groups respectively). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference between voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean anthropometric parameter changes (i.e. H1: µ1 ≠ µ2). |
| Secondary | Anthropometric parameter changes in BMI | Baseline & Week 12 | Anthropometric parameter changes in BMI: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean anthropometric parameter changes (i.e. H0: µ1 = µ2 where µ1 and µ2 represent the mean anthropometric parameter changes in the glibenclamide and voglibose groups respectively). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference between voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean anthropometric parameter changes (i.e. H1: µ1 ≠ µ2). |
| Secondary | Anthropometric parameter changes in Waist Circumference (WC) | Baseline & Week 6 | Anthropometric parameter changes in WC: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean anthropometric parameter changes (i.e. H0: µ1 = µ2 where µ1 and µ2 represent the mean anthropometric parameter changes in the glibenclamide and voglibose groups respectively). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference between voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean anthropometric parameter changes (i.e. H1: µ1 ≠ µ2). |
| Secondary | Anthropometric parameter changes in Waist Circumference (WC) | Baseline & Week 12 | Anthropometric parameter changes in WC: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean anthropometric parameter changes (i.e. H0: µ1 = µ2 where µ1 and µ2 represent the mean anthropometric parameter changes in the glibenclamide and voglibose groups respectively). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference between voglibose and glibenclamide groups in the mean anthropometric parameter changes (i.e. H1: µ1 ≠ µ2). |
| Secondary | Drug related AEs | Baseline & Week 6 | Drug related AEs: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the proportion of participants experiencing drug related AEs in the voglibose and glibenclamide groups (i.e. H0: p1 = p2 where p1 and p2 represent the proportion of participants experiencing a drug related AE in the glibenclamide and voglibose groups, respectively). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference between the proportion of participants experiencing drug related AEs in the voglibose and glibenclamide groups (i.e. H1: p1 ≠ p2). |
| Secondary | Drug related AEs | Baseline & Week 12 | Drug related AEs: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the proportion of participants experiencing drug related AEs in the voglibose and glibenclamide groups (i.e. H0: p1 = p2 where p1 and p2 represent the proportion of participants experiencing a drug related AE in the glibenclamide and voglibose groups, respectively). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference between the proportion of participants experiencing drug related AEs in the voglibose and glibenclamide groups (i.e. H1: p1 ≠ p2). |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05688332/registered