ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Weight Discrimination and Poor Cardiovascular Health

NCT05714696, Not applicable, Completed, Florida State University; results first posted 2025-05-15

Trial 12

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleWeight Discrimination and Poor Cardiovascular HealthClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT05714696ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment333 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorFlorida State UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsObesityClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsWeight discrimination experience, Control experienceClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2023-02-06ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2025-05-15ClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2025-05-15ClinicalTrials.gov
Limitations and caveatsBecause the of mechanism used to fund this project (R56), we received only one year of funding and thus we were not able to reach our desired sample size of 320 participants.ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryNegative Affect2 minutes after delivery of the intervention
A modified version of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale-Expanded Form (PANAS-X) will be used to assess emotions in response to the experimental manipulation. The scale demonstrates good validity and reliability. Emotions will be assessed with 46 adjectives (e.g., angry, confident) by indicating the extent to each emotion is felt at that moment (1=very slightly or not at all to 5=extremely). A composite score for negative affect will be created by taking the average of the relevant adjectives. Scores will range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more negative emotion.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryPositive Affect2 minutes after delivery of the intervention
A modified version of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale-Expanded Form (PANAS-X) will be used to assess emotions in response to the experimental manipulation. The scale demonstrates good validity and reliability. Emotions will be assessed with 46 adjectives (e.g., angry, confident) by indicating the extent to each emotion is felt at that moment (1=very slightly or not at all to 5=extremely). A composite score for positive affect will be created by taking the average of the relevant adjectives. Scores will range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more positive emotion.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimarySelf-efficacy for Weight Control Behavior6 minutes after delivery of the intervention
Self-efficacy (perceived confidence) in one's ability to engage in weight control behaviors (e.g., dietary restraint, physical activity) over the next six months will be assessed. Self-efficacy for dietary restraint will be assessed with the short form of the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire (e.g., I can resist eating … when I am depressed or down; 8 items). Self-efficacy for physical activity will be assessed with the Exercise Self-efficacy Scale (e.g., I am confident I can participate in regular exercise when … I am tired; 5 items). Weight control items will be interspersed with items assessing self-efficacy for other health behaviors (e.g., flu vaccination, sleep). Each item will be rated on an 8-point scale (0=not at all confident to 7=very confident). Items will be averaged to create a composite score. Scores will range from 0 to 7, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy for weight control behavior.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryIntentions for Weight Control Behavior10 minutes after delivery of the intervention
Using the same health behaviors assessed for self-efficacy, intentions for weight control behavior will be assessed (i.e., intentions to engage in each behavior over the next six months). Each item will be rated on an 8-point scale (0=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree). Items will be averaged to create a composite score. Scores will range from 0 to 7, with higher scores indicating higher intentions to engage in weight control behavior.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryExecutive control_accuracy15 minutes after delivery of the intervention
The Stroop task provides a measure of executive control by assessing the ability to inhibit an automatic response (reading) in favor of performing a more controlled task (color naming). The task is a classic, widely used and well-validated measure of executive control. Eight blocks of 20 trials will be performed that will take approximately 5 minutes to complete. Executive control scores will be calculated for response accuracy and speed. Metric: accuracy (percentage of correct answers on mismatched trials). A lower percentage of correct answers on mismatched trials indicates worse executive control.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryExecutive control_speed15 minutes after delivery of the intervention
The Stroop task provides a measure of executive control by assessing the ability to inhibit an automatic response (reading) in favor of performing a more controlled task (color naming). The task is a classic, widely used and well-validated measure of executive control. Eight blocks of 20 trials will be performed that will take approximately 5 minutes to complete. Executive control scores will be calculated for accuracy and speed (reaction time). Metric: reaction time (average reaction time in milliseconds on mismatched trials). Longer reaction times on mismatched trials indicate worse executive control.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryDelay Discounting20 minutes after delivery of the intervention
Delay discounting involves the subjective depreciation of an incentive based on its timing. The measure assesses the ability to delay gratification, that is, a tendency to prioritize larger long-term rewards over smaller short-term rewards. The task involves choosing short vs. long-term rewards from a set of five dichotomous choices (e.g., to receive $1 immediately or $10 in one month). The task takes about 1 minute to administer, is highly reliable, and correlates well with longer and more extensive measures of delay discounting (metric: discount rate (k)). Scores will range from 0.000110 to 24, with higher scores indicating more impulsivity/lower ability to delay gratification.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in Cortisol From Baseline to First Follow-up Assessment25 minutes after delivery of the interventionThe investigators will measure cortisol secretion via saliva (passive drool) 25 minutes after delivery of the intervention (first follow-up) and compare it to baseline cortisol levels.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryComfort Eating30 minutes after delivery of the intervention
Comfort eating will be assessed via an eating task to objectively measure hyper-palatable (high-fat, -sodium, -sugar, and -carbohydrate) food intake. To avoid floor effects, the eating task will take place under the guise of a faux taste test, which will ostensibly guide the development of the food marketing campaign later during the study. To avoid ceiling effects and to allow eating behavior without fear that the experimenter will negatively judge the amount eaten, large quantities of each food will be made available. The task will take 10 minutes to complete and will be conducted in a private room. Bowls will be weighed (unobtrusively) before and after the task to compute the difference in grams, which will then be converted to kilocalories based on published nutrition information from the food maker. Higher kilocalorie consumption indicates a tendency to engage in more comfort eating during times of stress.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimarySocial Withdrawal45 minutes after delivery of the intervention
Social withdrawal will be assessed with a measure from previous research. The experimenter will present three options for working on the final task: alone, with a former group member, or with a new partner. Choosing to work alone reflects a desire to avoid social interaction. Each response will be assigned a numerical code (work alone = 0; work with a former group member = 1; work with a new partner = 2). Scores of zero indicate a greater tendency to withdraw socially during times of stress.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in Cortisol From Baseline to Second Follow-up Assessment60 minutes after delivery of the interventionThe investigators will measure cortisol secretion via saliva (passive drool) 60 minutes after delivery of the intervention (second follow-up) and compare it to baseline cortisol levels.ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource
PRIMARYNegative Affect2 minutes after delivery of the interventionscore on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYPositive Affect2 minutes after delivery of the interventionscore on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYSelf-efficacy for Weight Control Behavior6 minutes after delivery of the interventionscore on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYIntentions for Weight Control Behavior10 minutes after delivery of the interventionscore on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYExecutive control_accuracy15 minutes after delivery of the interventionThere are some missing data on this variable due to experimenter error.percentage of correct responsesMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYExecutive control_speed15 minutes after delivery of the interventionThere are some missing data on this variable due to experimenter error.millisecondsMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYDelay Discounting20 minutes after delivery of the interventionThere are some missing data on this variable due to experimenter error.score on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in Cortisol From Baseline to First Follow-up Assessment25 minutes after delivery of the interventionThere are some missing data on this variable due to poor quality saliva samples (too watery).ug/dLMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYComfort Eating30 minutes after delivery of the interventionThere are some missing data on this variable due to participant eating restrictions or allergies that prevented them completing the taste test as designed.kcalsMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYSocial Withdrawal45 minutes after delivery of the interventionOne participant is missing data due to experimenter error.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTSClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in Cortisol From Baseline to Second Follow-up Assessment60 minutes after delivery of the intervention
There are some missing data on this variable due to poor quality saliva samples (too watery). Of note, we were not able to run the statistical analysis on this variable due to the lack of variability in both groups.
ug/dLMEANClinicalTrials.gov

Results by group 26

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource
Negative AffectWeight Discrimination Experience1.43Standard Deviation 0.49score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Negative AffectControl Experience1.29Standard Deviation 0.33score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Positive AffectWeight Discrimination Experience2.83Standard Deviation 0.94score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Positive AffectControl Experience3.04Standard Deviation 0.82score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Self-efficacy for Weight Control BehaviorWeight Discrimination Experience4.29Standard Deviation 1.42score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Self-efficacy for Weight Control BehaviorControl Experience3.91Standard Deviation 1.42score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Intentions for Weight Control BehaviorWeight Discrimination Experience4.91Standard Deviation 1.30score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Intentions for Weight Control BehaviorControl Experience4.70Standard Deviation 1.28score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Executive control_accuracyWeight Discrimination Experience96Standard Deviation 5.0percentage of correct responsesClinicalTrials.gov
Executive control_accuracyControl Experience96Standard Deviation 4.7percentage of correct responsesClinicalTrials.gov
Executive control_speedWeight Discrimination Experience1191Standard Deviation 429millisecondsClinicalTrials.gov
Executive control_speedControl Experience1362Standard Deviation 492millisecondsClinicalTrials.gov
Delay DiscountingWeight Discrimination Experience0.86Standard Deviation 3.87score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Delay DiscountingControl Experience1.20Standard Deviation 4.78score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in Cortisol From Baseline to First Follow-up AssessmentWeight Discrimination Experience.0000Standard Deviation .0000ug/dLClinicalTrials.gov
Change in Cortisol From Baseline to First Follow-up AssessmentControl Experience.0076Standard Deviation .0874ug/dLClinicalTrials.gov
Comfort EatingWeight Discrimination Experience299.42Standard Deviation 194.72kcalsClinicalTrials.gov
Comfort EatingControl Experience365.73Standard Deviation 173.83kcalsClinicalTrials.gov
Social WithdrawalWeight Discrimination ExperienceWork by self72ParticipantsClinicalTrials.gov
Social WithdrawalControl ExperienceWork by self55ParticipantsClinicalTrials.gov

Participant flow 6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource
Overall StudySTARTEDWeight Discrimination Experience136ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudySTARTEDControl Experience135ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDWeight Discrimination Experience136ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDControl Experience135ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDWeight Discrimination Experience0ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDControl Experience0ClinicalTrials.gov

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource
Total, all-cause mortalityWeight Discrimination Experience0136ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, all-cause mortalityControl Experience0135ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsWeight Discrimination Experience0136ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsControl Experience0135ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsWeight Discrimination Experience0136ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsControl Experience0135ClinicalTrials.gov

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Trial comparisons 2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Weight Discrimination Experience vs Control Experience: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Weight Discrimination Experience vs Control Experience: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests 2

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Delay DiscountingPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition

Source 4

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.3.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2564a570df2e7274cee2d4fa2959402fab41880e2cd412e4b590390035fbea69391ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.3.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.