ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05725200

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPre-Screening: Obtain a combined pharmacogenomic profile which can be used to provide a MTB-nominated treatmentIn average of 3 monthsNumber of participants that obtain a full combined pharmacogenomic profile which can be used to provide an MTB-nominated treatment in the Main Study.
Primary
Main Study: To evaluate the anti-tumor activity, measured as objective response rate (ORR) of MTB-nominated therapies with drugs not approved or implemented in standard of care (SOC) for treatment of mCRC.
Through study completion, in average 6 months
Number of patients who achieve objective response according RECIST 1.1 in the total study population and each study drug cohort of MTB-nominated therapies with drugs not approved or implemented SOC for treatment of mCRC.
SecondaryPre-Screening: To obtain a full combined pharmacogenomic profile from a tumor biopsy that is eligible for treatment decisions in a standard oncology practice.Through study completion, approximately 4 years
Pre-Screening: Number of participants who achieve a full combined pharmacogenomic profile eligible for treatment decisions either by * An MTB-nominated treatment provided in the Main Study * An MTB-nominated treatment considered as SOC * An MTB-nominated treatment not considered as SOC and not provided in the Main Study * No MTB-nominated treatment suggested
SecondaryMain Study: Progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR)Through study completion, approximately 6 monthsProgression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR) by RECIST 1.1, of participants receiving an MTB-nominated anti-cancer therapy, by calculation of number of days, weeks or years.
SecondaryMain Study: Overall survival (OS)Through study completion, approximately 6 months
OS of participants receiving MTB-nominated anti-cancer therapy, defined as the time from first dose of MTB-nominated treatment to date of death from any cause by calculation of number of days, weeks or years.
SecondaryMain Study: Safety and tolerability of the different MTB-nominated treatmentsThrough study completion, approximately 6 monthsRegister adverse events (AE) in accordance with CTCAE v 5.1
SecondaryMain Study: Objective response of an MTB-nominated anti-cancer therapy compared to objective response to the prior line(s) SOC treatment.Through study completion, approximately 6 monthsNumber of patients who achieve objective response according to RECIST 1.1 from anti-cancer therapy (SOC) in prior lines.
SecondaryMain Study: Efficacy of MTB-nominated anti-cancer therapy compared to the efficacy of prior lines SOC treatment.Through study completion, approximately 6 months.
DOR and PFS by RECIST 1.1 of participants receiving an MTB-nominated treatment and from anti-cancer therapy received in prior lines of SOC in each patient, by calculation of number of days, weeks or years.
SecondaryMain study: Objective response of an MTB-nominated anti-cancer therapy compared to objective response to the next line(s) SOC treatment.Through study completion, approximately 6 months.Number of patients who achieve objective response according to RECIST 1.1 from receiving anti-cancer therapy in the next/later lines.
SecondaryMain study: Efficacy of an MTB-nominated anti-cancer therapy compared to the efficacy achieved by the next line(s) of SOC treatment.Through study completion, approximately 6 months.
DOR and PFS by RECIST 1.1 of participants receiving an MTB-nominated treatment and from anti-cancer therapy in the next/later lines of SOC treatment in each patient, by calculation of number of days, weeks or years.
SecondaryMain study: Patient-reported outcome measures.Through study completion, approximately 6 months.
Describe patient-reported quality of life during the MTB-nominated treatment, registered by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 questionnaire. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions generating five functional scores (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health status/global quality of life scale score; three symptom scale scores (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting); and six stand alone one-item scores that capture additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, and diarrhea) and perceived financial burden. All the scales and single-item scores were linearly transformed so that each score ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score on the global health and functioning subscales is indicative of better functioning.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05725200/registered