ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05758415

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Participants With Moderate-severe Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

NCT05758415, Phase 3, Terminated, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2025-12-18

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Participants With Moderate-severe Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy. Trials, record NCT05758415. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05758415

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Participants With Moderate-severe Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
NCT number
NCT05758415
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
60 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Interventions
Secukinumab, Placebo
First posted
2023-03-07
Last updated
2025-12-18
Results first posted
2025-12-18

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) Physical Symptom Domain (PSD) Score at Week 16At Week 16
The WORC PSD is a sub-domain of the WORC Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) and comprises 6 questions that capture the key symptoms experienced by participants with rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT) relating to pain, weakness, stiffness, and mechanical symptoms. The raw score was converted to a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 represents the most symptomatic score, and 100 represents no symptoms.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Short Form (SF) Upper Extremity ScoreAt Week 16
PROMIS-SF Upper Extremity measures self-reported capability of physical function. Participants were asked a series of 7 questions rating their ability to perform a range of physical activities related to daily life that would be impacted by shoulder function. Each response was scored from 1 (unable to do) to 5 (without any difficulty). The responses for the 7 questions were added to the total raw score ranging from 7 (worst) to 35 (best) and converted to a T-score with a range from 16.3 (worst outcome) to 58.2 (best outcome), which was used for the analysis. Therefore, the theoretical range for the value for change from baseline for converted T-scores was between -41.9 to 41.9. A positive change from baseline indicated a better outcome.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Improvement (Increase) of at Least 40 Points From Baseline in the WORC PSD Score at Week 16At Week 16
The WORC PSD is a sub-domain of the WORC Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) and comprises 6 questions that capture the key symptoms experienced by participants with rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT) relating to pain, weakness, stiffness, and mechanical symptoms. The raw score was converted to a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 represents the most symptomatic score, and 100 represents no symptoms.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Improvement (Increase) of at Least 50 Points From Baseline in the WORC Total ScoreAt Week 16
The WORC is a patient-reported outcome tool, uniquely developed for rotator cuff conditions. The WORC is self-administered and consists of 21 items divided into five domains: physical symptoms, sport/recreation, work function, lifestyle function, and emotional function. The raw score was converted to a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 represents the most symptomatic score, and 100 represents no symptoms.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Improvement (Increase) of at Least 40 Points From Baseline in the WORC PSD Score at Week 24At Week 24
The WORC PSD is a sub-domain of the WORC Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) and comprises 6 questions that capture the key symptoms experienced by participants with rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT) relating to pain, weakness, stiffness, and mechanical symptoms. The raw score was converted to a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 represents the most symptomatic score, and 100 represents no symptoms.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in WORC PSD Score at Week 24At Week 24
The WORC PSD is a sub-domain of the WORC Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) and comprises 6 questions that capture the key symptoms experienced by participants with rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT) relating to pain, weakness, stiffness, and mechanical symptoms. The raw score was converted to a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 represents the most symptomatic score, and 100 represents no symptoms.
SecondarySecukinumab Serum ConcentrationsDay 1 and Weeks 4 and 16Pharmacokinetic parameters (measures of treatment exposure) were evaluated in all participants, with moderate to severe RCT, treated with secukinumab 300 mg s.c.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), by Maximum SeverityUp to Week 24
Severity: Mild - usually transient in nature and generally not interfering with normal activities; Moderate - sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal activities; Severe - prevents normal activities.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory ParametersUp to Week 24
Laboratory parameters included alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, amylase, calcium, creatinine, bilirubin, glucose, lactate dehydrogenase, lipase, magnesium, phosphate, potassium, sodium, urate, and urea nitrogen.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsUp to Week 24Vital signs included sitting systolic blood pressure, sitting diastolic blood pressure, and sitting pulse rate.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) Physical Symptom Domain (PSD) Score at Week 16At Week 16The full analysis set included all participants from the randomized set to whom study treatment was assigned. Number analyzed is the number of participants with available data.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Short Form (SF) Upper Extremity ScoreAt Week 16The full analysis set included all participants from the randomized set to whom study treatment was assigned. Number analyzed is the number of participants with available data.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Improvement (Increase) of at Least 40 Points From Baseline in the WORC PSD Score at Week 16At Week 16The full analysis set included all participants from the randomized set to whom study treatment was assigned. Number analyzed is the number of participants with available data.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Improvement (Increase) of at Least 50 Points From Baseline in the WORC Total ScoreAt Week 16The full analysis set included all participants from the randomized set to whom study treatment was assigned. Number analyzed is the number of participants with available data.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Improvement (Increase) of at Least 40 Points From Baseline in the WORC PSD Score at Week 24At Week 24The full analysis set included all participants from the randomized set to whom study treatment was assigned. Number analyzed is the number of participants with available data.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in WORC PSD Score at Week 24At Week 24The full analysis set included all participants from the randomized set to whom study treatment was assigned. Number analyzed is the number of participants with available data.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSecukinumab Serum ConcentrationsDay 1 and Weeks 4 and 16The safety set included all participants who took at least one dose of study treatment during the treatment period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with available data at that timepoint.μg/mLMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), by Maximum SeverityUp to Week 24The safety set included all participants who took at least one dose of study treatment during the treatment period.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory ParametersUp to Week 24The safety set included all participants who took at least one dose of study treatment during the treatment period.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsUp to Week 24The safety set included all participants who took at least one dose of study treatment during the treatment period.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group29

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) Physical Symptom Domain (PSD) Score at Week 16Secukinumab30.90Standard Deviation 19.250score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) Physical Symptom Domain (PSD) Score at Week 16Placebo28.69Standard Deviation 27.320score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Short Form (SF) Upper Extremity ScoreSecukinumab7.56Standard Deviation 6.776score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Short Form (SF) Upper Extremity ScorePlacebo8.48Standard Deviation 9.744score on a scale
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Improvement (Increase) of at Least 40 Points From Baseline in the WORC PSD Score at Week 16Secukinumab28.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Improvement (Increase) of at Least 40 Points From Baseline in the WORC PSD Score at Week 16Placebo36.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Improvement (Increase) of at Least 50 Points From Baseline in the WORC Total ScoreSecukinumab28.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Improvement (Increase) of at Least 50 Points From Baseline in the WORC Total ScorePlacebo29.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Improvement (Increase) of at Least 40 Points From Baseline in the WORC PSD Score at Week 24Secukinumab42.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Improvement (Increase) of at Least 40 Points From Baseline in the WORC PSD Score at Week 24Placebo33.3percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSecukinumab30
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo30
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSecukinumab28
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo24
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSecukinumab2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo6

Adverse events4

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsSecukinumab030
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsPlacebo230
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersSecukinumab030
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo330

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySecukinumab030
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo030
Total, other adverse eventsSecukinumab030
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo430
Total, serious adverse eventsSecukinumab030
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo030

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Secukinumab vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Secukinumab vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05758415

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05758415/results?page=2