ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

EfFect of Ablation of Persistent AtriaL Fibrillation on COgNitive Function in Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment

NCT05790707, Not applicable, Recruiting, Poitiers University Hospital

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleEfFect of Ablation of Persistent AtriaL Fibrillation on COgNitive Function in Individuals With Mild Cognitive ImpairmentClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT05790707ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusRecruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment120 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorPoitiers University HospitalClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsMild Cognitive Impairment, Persistent Atrial FibrillationClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsAtrial fibrillation ablation + antiarrhythmic drugs, Antiarrhythmic drugClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2023-03-30ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-01-23ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryMontreal Cognitive Assessmentquestionnaire score evolution 6 monthsbaseline (randomization) and 6 months after randomization
To evaluate the effect of "atrial fibrillation ablation + antiarrhythmic drugs" on cognitive function as assessed by the change at the Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score between randomization (M0) and 6 months after randomization (M6), compared with "antiarrhythmic drugs alone" in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation associated with mild cognitive impairment. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher score indicates better cognitive performance.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryBaseline characteristics associated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment score improvementbaseline (randomization) and 6 months after randomization
To define the baseline characteristics associated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment improvement between randomization (M0) and 6 months after randomization (M6) in patients with mild cognitive impairment and persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher score indicates better cognitive performance.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChanges in different types of cognitive functionsbaseline (randomization) and 6 months after randomization
To assess changes in different cognitive functions measured by a comprehensive neurocognitive assessment between randomization (M0) and 6 months after randomization (M6). The assessed tests are : Free recall/indexed recall 16, WAIS IV "digit memory" subtest, Rapid Frontal Efficiency Battery (BREF) score, Trail Making Test (TMT- GREFEX version), Verbal fluency (GREFEX version) categorical (animals) and literal (letter P), Oral naming of the BETL (Battery for the Evaluation of Language Disorders), STROOP test (GREFEX version), Rey figure, Processing speed index from the WAIS IV.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMontreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score evolution 12 monthsbaseline (randomization) and 12 months after randomization
To evaluate the effect of "atrial fibrillation ablation + antiarrhythmic drugs" on cognitive function as assessed by the change at the Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score between randomization (M0) and 12 months after randomization (M12), compared with "antiarrhythmic drugs alone". The Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher score indicates better cognitive performance.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryAssociation between atrial fibrillation burden and cognitive functionbaseline (randomization) and 12 months after randomization
To evaluate the association between atrial fibrillation burden and cognitive function as assessed by the change at the Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score between randomization (M0) and 12 months after randomization (M12). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher score indicates better cognitive performance.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryQuality of life Short Form Survey (SF-12)baseline (randomization), 6 and 12 months after randomization
To evaluate the effect of "atrial fibrillation ablation + antiarrhythmic drugs" on quality of life assessed by the change at the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) between randomization (M0), 6 and 12 months after randomization (M6 and M12), compared with "antiarrhythmic drugs alone". Score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryQuality of life QOL-ADbaseline (randomization), 6 and 12 months after randomization
To evaluate the effect of "atrial fibrillation ablation + antiarrhythmic drugs" on quality of life assessed by the change at the Quality of life in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD) questionnaire scores between randomization (M0), 6 and 12 months after randomization (M6 and M12), compared with "antiarrhythmic drugs alone". Score ranges from 13 to 52. The higher the score, the better quality of life the participant has.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 4

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test ASecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test BSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)