ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Executive Control Training for Adolescents With ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial

NCT05874791, Not applicable, Active not recruiting, Sykehuset Innlandet HF

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleExecutive Control Training for Adolescents With ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness TrialClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT05874791ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusActive not recruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment120 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorSykehuset Innlandet HFClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Executive DysfunctionClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsGoal Management trainingClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2023-05-25ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2025-05-28ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryChange in Parent-Reported Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition (BRIEF-2).Change from Baseline up to 24 months (Assessed at Baseline, after 12 weeks, after 12 months, and after 24 months).Rating inventory assessing executive function in daily life. Higher scores indicate greater executive dysfunction. The total score ranges from 86 - 258.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Self-Reported Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition (BRIEF-2).Change from Baseline up to 24 months (Assessed at Baseline, after 12 weeks, after 12 months, and after 24 months).Rating inventory assessing executive function in daily life. Higher scores indicate greater executive dysfunction. The total score ranges from 80 - 240.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Teacher-Reported Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition (BRIEF-2).Change from Baseline up to 12 weeks (Assessed at Baseline, and after 12 weeks).Rating inventory assessing executive function in daily life. Higher scores indicate greater executive dysfunction. The total score ranges from 86 - 258.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Attention Span task from Cognitive Assessment at Bedside for IPad (CABPad).Change from Baseline up to 12 weeks (Assessed at Baseline, and after 12 weeks).Performance-based Executive functioning tests: To assess simple attention span. The scoring is based on the number of objects remembered. More objects indicate higher attention span.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Working Memory task from Cognitive Assessment at Bedside for IPad (CABPad).Change from Baseline up to 12 weeks (Assessed at Baseline, and after 12 weeks).Performance-based Executive functioning test: To assess working memory. The scoring is based on the number of objects remembered. More objects indicate a better working memory.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Arrow Stroop task from Cognitive Assessment at Bedside for IPad (CABPad).Change from Baseline up to 12 weeks (Assessed at Baseline, and after 12 weeks).
Performance-based Executive functioning test: To investigate executive control of attention, more specifically cognitive impulse control. Scoring is based on reaction time and the number of incorrect/correct responses.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Symbol Digit Coding (Mental and Visuo-Motor Speed) task from Cognitive Assessment at Bedside for IPad (CABPad).Change from Baseline up to 12 weeks (Assessed at Baseline, and after 12 weeks).Performance-based Executive functioning test: To investigate mental and visuo-motor speed. Scoring is based on reaction time and the number of incorrect/correct responses.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Parent-Reported Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA).Change from Baseline up to 24 months (Assessed at Baseline, after 12 weeks, and after 24 months).Assessment rating adaptive and maladaptive functioning. Higher scores indicate greater difficulty. The total score ranges from 0 - 224.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Self-Reported Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA).Change from Baseline up to 24 months (Assessed at Baseline, after 12 weeks, and after 24 months).Assessment rating adaptive and maladaptive functioning. Higher scores indicate greater difficulty. The total score ranges from 0 - 224.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Parent-Reported Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS-P).Change from Baseline up to 24 months (Assessed at Baseline, after 12 weeks, and after 24 months).
Rating inventory that evaluates the extent to which an individual's ability to function is impaired. The 50-item scale uses a Likert scale, such that any item rating 2 or 3 is clinically impaired. The total score ranges from 0 - 150.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Parent-Reported ADHD Rating scale (ADHD-RS-IV Home).Change from Baseline up to 24 months (Assessed at Baseline, after 12 weeks, and after 24 months).
Rating inventory that detects ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents reported by parents. The 18-item scale generates a total score between 0 - 54, where the higher score indicates greater difficulty.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Teacher-Reported ADHD Rating scale (ADHD-RS-IV School).Change from Baseline up to 12 weeks (Assessed at Baseline, and after 12 weeks).Rating inventory that detects ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents. The 18-item scale generates a total score between 0 - 54, where the higher score indicates greater difficulty.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Parent-Rated Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL).Change from Baseline up to 24 months (Assessed at Baseline, after 12 weeks, and after 24 months).Measurement of health-related quality of life. The 23-item scale generates a total score between 0-100, where 100 points indicate optimal quality of life.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Self-Rated Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL).Change from Baseline up to 24 months (Assessed at Baseline, after 12 weeks, and after 24 months).Measurement of health-related quality of life.The 23-items scale generates a total score between 0-100, where 100 points indicate optimal quality of life.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS).Change from Baseline up to 12 weeks (Assessed at Baseline, and after 12 weeks).
Method of rating performance based on a criterion-referenced scale with defined anchor points. If the patient achieves the expected level, this is scored at 0. If they achieve a better than expected outcome this is scored at: +1 (somewhat better), +2 (much better). If they achieve a worse than expected outcome this is scored at: -1 (somewhat worse), or -2 (much worse). The patient and the clinician decide this score together.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS).Change from Baseline up to 12 weeks (Assessed at Baseline, and after 12 weeks).Measure of a child's or adolescent's psychosocial functioning on a scale from 1 (lowest functioning) to 100 (superior functioning in all areas). Rated by an independent observer.ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)