ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05885737

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in the Weekly Mean of the Daily 24-hour WI-NRS Score at Week 4 of the DB PeriodFrom Baseline to Week 4
Analysis was performed on the FAS. The FAS included all participants who were randomized to treatment, received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had a non-missing baseline assessment for the weekly mean of the daily 24-hour WI-NRS score. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed', 'N' = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 3-point Improvement From Baseline With Respect to the Weekly Mean of the Daily 24-hour WI-NRS in the DB PeriodFrom Baseline, and at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Analysis was performed on FAS. The FAS included all participants who were randomized to treatment, received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had a non-missing baseline assessment for the weekly mean of the daily 24-hour WI-NRS score. Here, 'number analyzed', 'n' = participants with available data for each specified timepoint.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 4-point Improvement From Baseline With Respect to the Weekly Mean of the Daily 24-hour WI-NRS in the DB PeriodFrom Baseline, and at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Analysis was performed on FAS. The FAS included all participants who were randomized to treatment, received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had a non-missing baseline assessment for the weekly mean of the daily 24-hour WI-NRS score. Here, 'number analyzed', 'n' = participants with available data for each specified timepoint.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Weekly Mean of the 24-hour WI-NRS Score at Each Week of the DB PeriodFrom Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12
Analysis was performed on FAS. The FAS included all participants who were randomized to treatment, received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had a non-missing baseline assessment for the weekly mean of the daily 24-hour WI-NRS score. Here, 'number analyzed', 'n' = participants with available data for each specified timepoint.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Itch-related Quality-of-life (QoL) as Assessed by the 5-D Itch Scale Total Score (DB Period)From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Analysis was performed on FAS. The FAS included all participants who were randomized to treatment, received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had a non-missing baseline assessment for the weekly mean of the daily 24-hour WI-NRS score. Here, 'number analyzed', 'n' = participants with available data for each specified timepoint.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Itch-related QoL as Assessed by the 5-D Itch Scale Total Score (OLE Period)From Baseline to OLE Period - Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 14
Analysis was performed on the OLE Safety Analysis Set, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IP in the OLE period. Here, 'number analyzed', 'n' = participants with available data for each specified timepoint.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Itch-related QoL as Assessed by the Skindex-10 Scale Total Score (DB Period)From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Analysis was performed on FAS. The FAS included all participants who were randomized to treatment, received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had a non-missing baseline assessment for the weekly mean of the daily 24-hour WI-NRS score. Here, 'number analyzed', 'n' = participants with available data for each specified timepoint.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Itch-related QoL as Assessed by the Skindex-10 Scale Total Score (OLE Period)From Baseline to OLE Period - Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 14
For the OLE period analysis was performed on OLE-SAS, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IP in the OLE period. Here, 'number analyzed', 'n' = participants with available data for each specified timepoint.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPatient Global Impression of ChangeAt Week 12
Analysis was performed on FAS. The FAS included all participants who were randomized to treatment, received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had a non-missing baseline assessment for the weekly mean of the daily 24-hour WI-NRS score. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed', 'N' = participants with available data for the outcome measure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Up to Week 27 (12 weeks in DB + 14 weeks in OLE +1 week of follow up)
Analysis was performed on safety analysis set in DB period (DB-SAF). DB-SAF included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product during the DB period. For the OLE period analysis was performed on OLE Safety Analysis Set, which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of IP in the OLE period.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)Up to Week 27 (12 weeks in DB + 14 weeks in OLE +1 week of follow up)
The DB and OLE SAS consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product during the DB period and OLE period, respectively. Participants were analysed according to the actual treatment received. Here, 'number analyzed', 'n' = participants with available data for each specified timepoint.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs and Laboratory EvaluationsFrom baseline to Week 27 (12 weeks in DB + 14 weeks in OLE +1 week of follow up)
The DB and OLE SAS consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product during the DB period and OLE period, respectively. Participants were analysed according to the actual treatment received.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05885737/outcomes