ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Effect of a Progressive Treadmill Training Protocol for Parkinson's Disease

NCT05902065, Not applicable, Unknown, University of Florence

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleEffect of a Progressive Treadmill Training Protocol for Parkinson's DiseaseClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT05902065ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusUnknownClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment60 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorUniversity of FlorenceClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsParkinson Disease, Gait, Festinating, Fall Due to Loss of Equilibrium, Gait, Unsteady, Gait, ShufflingClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsAVR Treadmill training with C-Mill, Conventional Treadmill training with C-MillClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2023-06-13ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2023-06-13ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 24

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryMean change in gait and balance parameters assessed by the Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment - POMA scale (intra-group and between-group comparisons)T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)
The POMA scale is an easily administered task-oriented test that measures an older adult's balance (9 items) and gait (7 items) abilities. Items are scored with a three-point (0-2) or a two points (0-1) scale, where "0" indicates the highest level of impairment and "2" - "1" for dichotomic items - the individual's independence. Total Balance Score = 16; Total Gait Score = 12.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryMean change in motors parameters assessed by the Modified Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), part III (intra-group and between-group comparisons)T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)
The MDS-UPDRS part III includes 18 items concerning the motor examination in PD, evaluating different aspects: walking, balance, speech, bradykinesia, tremor, and rigidity. Each item is scored on a five-point ordinal rating scale, ranging from 0 to 4, where "0" indicates normal function and "4" is the highest level of impairment. Some items inclusive of evaluation of a symptom in different parts of the body, e.g on the right side, on the left side, upper and lower limbs). Score range 0-132.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryCorrelation between Raman spectra of blood cEVs and primary outcomes after patient stratificationT0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks)
The biological characterization of patients at T0 analyzing cEVs performed by Raman Spectroscopy will provide numerical scores that will be correlated with motor parameters obtained at T1 to identify predictive biomarkers of an outcome measure of rehabilitation
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChanges in individual Raman spectra of blood-derived cEVs before and after treatmentT0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks)
The Raman spectrum of blood-derived cEVs before and after treatment will be compared to identify spectral differences and to monitor the effect of rehabilitation on the spectral biomarker. Changes in the presence/absence of peaks and peaks intensity will be evaluated.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean changes in walking speed (intra-group and between-group comparisons).T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)Gait speed (m/s) will be measured at both comfortable and maximum speeds using the Optogait system (http://www.optogait.com/Gait-Phases).ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean changes in step length during walking (intra-group and between-group comparisons).T1 (end of treatment-8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)Right and left step length (m) will be measured at both comfortable and maximum speeds using the Optogait system (http://www.optogait.com/Gait-Phases).ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean change in walking endurance assessed with the 6-Minutes Walking Test (6MWT) (intra-group and between-group comparisons).T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)The distance (m) walked in 6 minutes on a 30 meters walkway will be measured, indicating the greater distance, a better scoreClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean change in gait adaptability assessed by C-Gait application of C-Mill (intra-group and between-group comparisons)T1 (end of treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)
Walking-adaptability task performance was defined as the percentage of correctly performed steps relative to the projected visual objects in 6 different tasks. C-gait score for each task: Level×2×Performance (%) / 100. The overall assessment score was an average score based on average performance over the six walking-adaptability tasks at the higher level of difficulty, ranging from 0 (poor performance) to 8 (excellent performance).
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean change in freezing during walking assessed by the Freezing Of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q) (intra-group and between-group comparisons).T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)
The FOG-Q includes 6 items that inquires about the subject's experiences of freezing during the previous week. Each item use a five-points ordinal scale, ranging from "0" (= absence of symptoms) to "4" (= more severe disturbance). Total score ranges from 0 to 24, and higher scores correspond to more severe freezing.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean change in postural stability (intra-group and between-group comparisons)T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)Postural sway assessed with a dynamometric footplate (postural sway in quiet standing with opened/closed eyes). Lower postural sway corresponds to better stability.ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean change in global cognitive functions assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (intra-group and between-group comparisons)T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)
The MoCA test is used to assess global cognitive functions. A score superior to 18.58 is required for inclusion in the study (Aiello et al, 2021); parallel versions will be administered at different time points (Siciliano et al, 2019). Higher values correspond to better cognition, range of score 0-30.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean change in global cognitive functions assessed by the Parkinson's disease-cognitive rating scale, italian version (PD-CRS) (intra-group and between-group comparisons)T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)
The PD-CRS is a suitable tool to assess cognition in PD, it evaluates different domains and permits to obtain a cortical and a subcortical score: sum of results in item 1,3,4,5,7,8,9 (range of score 0-104), represents the subcortical score; sum of results in item 2 and 6 (range of score 0-30), represents the cortical score. Higher scores correspond to better cognition
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean change in attention skills assessed by Trail Making Test A and B (TMTA and TMTB) (intra-group and between-group comparisons)T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)
TMTA evaluates sustained attention and the visual search capacity, and TMTB evaluates divided attention. For both tests A and B time and errors will be registered. Slowness and more errors are indicative of lower performances (No range of score).
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean change in executive functions as assessed by the Stroop Test (intra-group and between-group comparisons)T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)The Stroop test is used to assess executive functions (time and error interference effect). Slowness and higher interference effect indicative of lower performances. (No range of score).ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean change in executive functions as assessed by the Symbol Digit oral version (intra-group and between-group comparisons)T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)Digit symbol is used for the assessment of attention and working memory. Range of score 0-110. Higher score indicative of better performanceClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean change in functional mobility assessed by the Modified Parkinson Activity Scale (MPAS) (intra-group and between-group comparisons)T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)The MPAS scale evaluates motor skills in activities of daily living. Range of score 0-56; higher score indicative of better functional mobility.ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean change in functional mobility assessed by the Timed up and go test (TUG) (intra-group and between-group comparisons)T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)
The TUG is a general physical performance test used to assess mobility, balance, and gait during walking, turning, and sit-to-stand tasks. Time is recorded during the test; less time indicative of better performances (no range of score).
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean change in functional autonomy assessed by the modified Barthel Index (mBI) (intra-group and between-group comparisons)T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)mBI is a scale for assessing functional independence in daily life. Range of score 0-100. Lower score corresponds to less independence.ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean change in the quality of life assessed by the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire Italian version (PDQ-39-IT) (intra-group and between-group comparisons)T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)
PDQ-39 is a self-report questionnaire for assessing the quality of daily life in PD. It includes 39 items assessing how often persons experience difficulty across 8 quality of life dimensions. Each item is scored on a five-point ordinal scale from 0 (=never) to 4 (always). Each dimension total score ranges from 0 (never have difficulty) to 100 (always have difficulty). The summary total score is calculated as the mean of the 8 dimension total scores. A higher score corresponds to a lower quality of life.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMean change in the fear to fall assessed by the Falls efficacy scale, Italian version (FES-I) (intra-group and between-group comparisons)T0 (baseline); T1 (end of the treatment - 8 weeks); T2 (3 months after the end of treatment)
FES-I is used for the assessment of the fear-of-fall. It includes 16 items rated on a four-point scale from 1 (not confident at all) to 4 (completely confident). Total score ranges from minimum 16 (no concern about falling) to maximum 64 (severe concern about falling).
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 20

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
686873BACKGROUNDPubMed
1991946BACKGROUNDPubMed
3944402BACKGROUNDPubMed
8915764BACKGROUNDPubMed
16796824BACKGROUNDPubMed
18356292BACKGROUNDPubMed
18691929BACKGROUNDPubMed
19025984BACKGROUNDPubMed
19836635BACKGROUNDPubMed
24021298BACKGROUNDPubMed
24125724BACKGROUNDPubMed
24221858BACKGROUNDPubMed
25515786BACKGROUNDPubMed
28224328BACKGROUNDPubMed
30088166BACKGROUNDPubMed
30637545BACKGROUNDPubMed
31648040BACKGROUNDPubMed
33828470BACKGROUNDPubMed
34313961BACKGROUNDPubMed
34656008BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 3

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Stroop Color-Word TestOther outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test AOther outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test BOther outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)