ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05905783

Hidradenitis Suppurativa Study of Izokibep

NCT05905783, Phase 3, Terminated, ACELYRIN Inc.; results first posted 2025-10-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Hidradenitis Suppurativa Study of Izokibep. Trials, record NCT05905783. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05905783

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Hidradenitis Suppurativa Study of Izokibep
NCT number
NCT05905783
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
258 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
ACELYRIN Inc.
Conditions
Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Interventions
Placebo, Izokibep
First posted
2023-06-15
Last updated
2025-10-15
Results first posted
2025-10-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response 75 (HiSCR75) at Week 12Week 12
The percentage of participants achieving HiSCR75 was defined as meeting all 3 criteria below: * (\[abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count at baseline - AN count at current visit\] / AN count at baseline) × 100% ≥ 75% * Abscess count at baseline ≥ abscess count at the current visit * Draining fistula count at baseline ≥ draining fistula count at the current visit. HiSCR75 was evaluated using nonresponse imputation (NRI) and multiple imputation (MI) methods.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving HiSCR90 at Week 12Week 12
The percentage of participants achieving HiSCR90 was defined as meeting all 3 criteria below: * (\[AN count at baseline - AN count at current visit\] / AN count at baseline) × 100% ≥ 90% * Abscess count at baseline ≥ abscess count at the current visit * Draining fistula count at baseline ≥ draining fistula count at the current visit. HiSCR90 was evaluated using nonresponse imputation (NRI) and multiple imputation (MI) methods.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving HiSCR100 at Week 12Week 12
The percentage of participants achieving HiSCR100 was defined as meeting all 3 criteria below: * (\[AN count at baseline - AN count at current visit\] / AN count at baseline) × 100% = 100% * Abscess count at baseline ≥ abscess count at the current visit * Draining fistula count at baseline ≥ draining fistula count at the current visit. HiSCR100 was evaluated using nonresponse imputation (NRI) and multiple imputation (MI) methods.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving HiSCR50 at Week 12Week 12
The percentage of participants achieving HiSCR50 was defined as meeting all 3 criteria below: * \[(AN count at baseline - AN count at current visit) / AN count at baseline\] × 100% ≥ 50% * Abscess count at baseline ≥ abscess count at the current visit * Draining fistula count at baseline ≥ draining fistula count at the current visit. HiSCR50 was evaluated using nonresponse imputation (NRI) and multiple imputation (MI) methods.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced One or More (≥ 1) Disease Flare at Week 12Up to Week 12
HS flares were defined as ≥ 25% increase in AN count with a minimum increase of 2 AN relative to baseline, i.e. participants must meet all the following criteria: * (AN count at current visit- AN count at baseline) / AN count at baseline ×100% ≥ 25% * AN count at current visit- AN count at baseline ≥ 2. Participants who received antibiotic therapy that could affect HS were imputed as non-response (NRI). Other participants with missing data were imputed with multiple imputation.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)Baseline and Week 12
DLQI included 10 items arranged in 6 categories: symptoms and feelings, daily activity, leisure, work or study, interpersonal relationships, and treatment. The total score could range from 0 (no impact to life quality) to 30 (maximum impact).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Baseline Hurley Stage II Who Achieved AN Count of 0, 1, or 2 at Week 12Week 12
Calculated as observed values of 0, 1, or 2 for AN count (abscess count + inflammatory nodule count). AN count of 0, 1, or 2 was evaluated using nonresponse imputation (NRI) and multiple imputation (MI) methods.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Baseline NRS ≥ 4 Achieving at Least 3-point Reduction at Week 12 in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Patient Global Assessment of Skin Pain at Its WorstWeek 12
NRS in Patient Global Assessment of Skin Pain ranged from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain bad as you can imagine). The skin pain score at each visit was calculated using average of daily scores among the 7 days up to and including the day of visit, with a minimum of 4 days (consecutive or non-consecutive) with scores required. Reduction in NRS was evaluated using nonresponse imputation (NRI) and multiple imputation (MI) methods.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs (SAEs) and Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESIs) in Period 1Up to Week 16
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, meets one or more of the criteria listed: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event. The following events of special interest were monitored in this study: candida infection; inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); suicidal ideation; malignancies; major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; tuberculosis; infections; cytopenias and systemic hypersensitivity reactions. Clinically significant changes in vital signs and laboratory tests recorded after treatment administration were documented as TEAEs.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With TEAEs, SAEs and AESIs in Period 2From Week 16 to follow-up, Week 59
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, meets one or more of the criteria listed: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event. The following events of special interest were monitored in this study: candida infection; IBD; suicidal ideation; malignancies; major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; tuberculosis; infections; cytopenias and systemic hypersensitivity reactions. Clinically significant changes in vital signs and laboratory tests recorded after treatment administration were documented as TEAEs.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response 75 (HiSCR75) at Week 12Week 12Full Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized.percentage of participantsMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving HiSCR90 at Week 12Week 12Full Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized.percentage of participantsMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving HiSCR100 at Week 12Week 12Full Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized.percentage of participantsMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving HiSCR50 at Week 12Week 12Full Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized.percentage of participantsMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Experienced One or More (≥ 1) Disease Flare at Week 12Up to Week 12Full Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized.percentage of participantsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)Baseline and Week 12Full Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized. Only participants with a result at the timepoint are included.Score on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Baseline Hurley Stage II Who Achieved AN Count of 0, 1, or 2 at Week 12Week 12Full Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized. Participants with Hurley Stage II at baseline were included.percentage of participantsMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Baseline NRS ≥ 4 Achieving at Least 3-point Reduction at Week 12 in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Patient Global Assessment of Skin Pain at Its WorstWeek 12Full Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized. Participants with baseline NRS ≥ 4 were included.Percentage of participantsMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious AEs (SAEs) and Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESIs) in Period 1Up to Week 16Safety Analysis Set: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 administration of study treatment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With TEAEs, SAEs and AESIs in Period 2From Week 16 to follow-up, Week 59Safety Analysis Set Period 2: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 administration of study treatment in Period 2 of the Study.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response 75 (HiSCR75) at Week 12Placebo-Izokibep 160 mg QW20.395% Confidence Interval 13.1 to 27.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response 75 (HiSCR75) at Week 12Izokibep 160 mg QW32.695% Confidence Interval 24.3 to 40.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving HiSCR90 at Week 12Placebo-Izokibep 160 mg QW9.295% Confidence Interval 3.8 to 14.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving HiSCR90 at Week 12Izokibep 160 mg QW24.395% Confidence Interval 16.7 to 31.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving HiSCR100 at Week 12Placebo-Izokibep 160 mg QW7.395% Confidence Interval 2.5 to 12.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving HiSCR100 at Week 12Izokibep 160 mg QW21.495% Confidence Interval 14.2 to 28.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving HiSCR50 at Week 12Placebo-Izokibep 160 mg QW36.595% Confidence Interval 27.8 to 45.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving HiSCR50 at Week 12Izokibep 160 mg QW47.995% Confidence Interval 39.0 to 56.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced One or More (≥ 1) Disease Flare at Week 12Placebo-Izokibep 160 mg QW31.195% Confidence Interval 22.9 to 39.3percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced One or More (≥ 1) Disease Flare at Week 12Izokibep 160 mg QW28.395% Confidence Interval 20.5 to 36.2percentage of participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo-Izokibep 160 mg QW129
Overall StudySTARTEDIzokibep 160 mg QW129
Overall StudyCompleted Period 1Placebo-Izokibep 160 mg QW109
Overall StudyCompleted Period 1Izokibep 160 mg QW103
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo-Izokibep 160 mg QW19
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIzokibep 160 mg QW9
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo-Izokibep 160 mg QW110
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIzokibep 160 mg QW120

Adverse events76

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherInjection site reactionGeneral disordersPlacebo QW - Izokibep 160 mg QW: Period 11012916
otherInjection site reactionGeneral disordersIzokibep 160 mg QW: Period 186129380
otherInjection site reactionGeneral disordersPlacebo QW - Izokibep 160 mg QW: Period 266109328
otherInjection site reactionGeneral disordersIzokibep 160 mg QW: Period 234100186
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo QW - Izokibep 160 mg QW: Period 131293
otherFatigueGeneral disordersIzokibep 160 mg QW: Period 1712912
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo QW - Izokibep 160 mg QW: Period 201090
otherFatigueGeneral disordersIzokibep 160 mg QW: Period 221002
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo QW - Izokibep 160 mg QW: Period 1912912
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsIzokibep 160 mg QW: Period 11112911

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo QW - Izokibep 160 mg QW: Period 10129
Total, all-cause mortalityIzokibep 160 mg QW: Period 10129
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo QW - Izokibep 160 mg QW: Period 20109
Total, all-cause mortalityIzokibep 160 mg QW: Period 20100
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo QW - Izokibep 160 mg QW: Period 135129
Total, other adverse eventsIzokibep 160 mg QW: Period 193129
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo QW - Izokibep 160 mg QW: Period 269109
Total, other adverse eventsIzokibep 160 mg QW: Period 240100
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo QW - Izokibep 160 mg QW: Period 15129
Total, serious adverse eventsIzokibep 160 mg QW: Period 11129

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05905783

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05905783/results?page=2