ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05918978

Open Label Extension of Efgartigimod in Adults With Post-COVID-19 POTS

NCT05918978, Phase 2, Terminated, argenx; results first posted 2025-10-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Open Label Extension of Efgartigimod in Adults With Post-COVID-19 POTS. Trials, record NCT05918978. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05918978

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Open Label Extension of Efgartigimod in Adults With Post-COVID-19 POTS
NCT number
NCT05918978
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
33 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
argenx
Conditions
Post-COVID Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome
Interventions
Efgartigimod
First posted
2023-06-26
Last updated
2025-10-23
Results first posted
2025-10-23
Limitations and caveats
This study was terminated not for safety concerns but because the parent study found that efgartigimod IV provided no efficacy benefit in adult participants with PC-POTS.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With TEAEs, TESAEs and TEAESIsFrom the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 60 days post last dose of study drug, up to 383 days
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other medically important event. An adverse event of special interest (AESI) was an AE of scientific and medical concern specific to the sponsor's product or program. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as AEs with onset on or after the first administration of study drug up to and including 60 days after the last study drug administration.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in the COMPASS 31 (2-week Recall Version)Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS) 31 modified version (2-week recall) is a self-rated questionnaire to evaluate the severity and distribution of autonomic symptoms in various autonomic nerve disorders. It consists of 31 questions in 6 weighted domains (orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal {GI}-mixed upper and diarrhea, bladder, and pupillomotor). A weighted total score of 0 (mild) to 100 (severe) was determined by adding a maximum raw score for each domain. Higher scores indicated a more severe degree of autonomic symptoms.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in the MaPSBaseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
The Malmö POTS Symptom Score (MaPS) score is a dedicated POTS symptom scoring questionnaire. The score consists of 12 questions that assess symptom burden related (tachycardia, palpitations, dizziness, presyncope) and unrelated to orthostatic intolerance (GI symptoms, insomnia, concentration difficulties). Participants graded their symptoms for the past 7 days using a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (very pronounced symptoms). The total score was calculated by summing up the items/individual items and range was 0 to 120 points, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Improved PGI-S at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
The Patient Global Impression-Severity (PGI-S) is a participant-rated, single-item scale to assess the severity of a health condition. The scale was used to assess the severity of symptoms over the past week (1-week recall) and overall experience of symptoms over the past 2 weeks (2-week recall). Both were rated on a 4-point type Likert scale, with scores ranging from 1 (none), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. An "improved PGI-S" was defined by a change from baseline of -3, -2 and -1.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Improved PGI-C at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
The Patient Global Impression-Change (PGIC) is a single-item scale to capture the participant's perception of an overall change in their symptoms from start of study drug. It was rated on a 7-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 1 (much better), 2 (somewhat better), 3 (a little better), 4 (no change), 5 (a little worse), 6 (somewhat worse), and 7 (much worse). Higher PGI-C scores signify worse outcome. An "improved PGI-C" was defined by a change from baseline of 1, 2 and 3.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 8aBaseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 8a assesses the impact and perceived fatigue during the last 7 days. This validated 8-question scale has 5 response options, with scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). Total scores ranged from 8 to 40; higher scores indicated higher fatigue levels and were converted to a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A decrease in T-score (negative change from baseline) indicated improvement in fatigue.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in the PROMIS Cognitive Function Short Form 6aBaseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
PROMIS Cognitive Function Short Form 6a assesses the frequency of cognitive difficulties experienced in the past 7 days. The questionnaire comprises 6 questions on subjective cognitive difficulties regarding a participant's concentration, memory, language, mental acuity, and perceived changes in cognitive functioning. The participant marks their response on a 5-point Likert scale (1: never and 5: very often). Scores ranged from 6 to 30; higher scores indicated worse perceived cognitive functioning and were converted to a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. An increase in T-score (positive change from baseline) indicated better cognitive function.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Total IgG Levels at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48Blood samples for immunoglobulin G (IgG) analysis were collected at specified time points. Total IgG concentrations were quantified using validated methods at a central laboratory.
SecondarySerum Concentration of EfgartigimodPre-dose at Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 1, 4, 12 and 24Serum samples were collected at specified timepoints to determine the concentration of efgartigimod.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With ADAs Against EfgartigimodFrom the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to Week 48
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against efgartigimod. ADA incidence reported here was defined as total number of participants with treatment-induced and treatment-boosted ADA. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as a baseline negative sample and at least 1 positive post-baseline sample. Treatment-boosted ADA was defined as a baseline positive sample and the titer value increased 4-fold or more compared to baseline.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With TEAEs, TESAEs and TEAESIsFrom the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 60 days post last dose of study drug, up to 383 daysThe safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants exposed to study drug.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in the COMPASS 31 (2-week Recall Version)Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48The FAS included all enrolled participants. Only those participants with data collected at Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48 are reported.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in the MaPSBaseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48The FAS included all enrolled participants. Only those participants with data collected at Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48 are reported.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Improved PGI-S at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48The FAS included all enrolled participants. Only those participants with data collected at Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48 are reported.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Improved PGI-C at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48The FAS included all enrolled participants. Only those participants with data collected at Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48 are reported.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 8aBaseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48The FAS included all enrolled participants. Only those participants with data collected at Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48 are reported.T-scoreMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in the PROMIS Cognitive Function Short Form 6aBaseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48The FAS included all enrolled participants. Only those participants with data collected at Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48 are reported.T-scoreMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Total IgG Levels at Weeks 24 and 48Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48The SAF included all enrolled participants exposed to study drug. Only those participants with data collected at Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48 are reported.percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYSerum Concentration of EfgartigimodPre-dose at Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 1, 4, 12 and 24
The pharmacokinetic analysis set (PKAS) included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of efgartigimod and had at least 1 measured concentration of efgartigimod at a scheduled PK time point after start of dosing without protocol violations or events with potential to affect the PK concentration. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.
microgram/milliliter (mcg/mL)MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With ADAs Against EfgartigimodFrom the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to Week 48The SAF included all enrolled participants exposed to study drug.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group45

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With TEAEs, TESAEs and TEAESIsEfgartigimod-EfgartigimodTEAEs13Participants
Number of Participants With TEAEs, TESAEs and TEAESIsPlacebo-EfgartigimodTEAEs12Participants
Number of Participants With TEAEs, TESAEs and TEAESIsEfgartigimod-EfgartigimodTESAEs0Participants
Number of Participants With TEAEs, TESAEs and TEAESIsPlacebo-EfgartigimodTESAEs0Participants
Number of Participants With TEAEs, TESAEs and TEAESIsEfgartigimod-EfgartigimodTEAESIs7Participants
Number of Participants With TEAEs, TESAEs and TEAESIsPlacebo-EfgartigimodTEAESIs5Participants
Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in the COMPASS 31 (2-week Recall Version)Efgartigimod-EfgartigimodWeek 2413.608Standard Deviation 29.7026score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in the COMPASS 31 (2-week Recall Version)Placebo-EfgartigimodWeek 248.447Standard Deviation 18.1170score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in the COMPASS 31 (2-week Recall Version)Efgartigimod-EfgartigimodWeek 481.780score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 in the MaPSEfgartigimod-EfgartigimodWeek 24-0.8Standard Deviation 22.02score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEfgartigimod-Efgartigimod20
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo-Efgartigimod13
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEfgartigimod-Efgartigimod1
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo-Efgartigimod0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEfgartigimod-Efgartigimod19
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo-Efgartigimod13

Adverse events124

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersEfgartigimod-Efgartigimod1201
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersPlacebo-Efgartigimod0130
otherEar discomfortEar and labyrinth disordersEfgartigimod-Efgartigimod0200
otherEar discomfortEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo-Efgartigimod1131
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersEfgartigimod-Efgartigimod1201
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo-Efgartigimod0130
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersEfgartigimod-Efgartigimod0200
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo-Efgartigimod1131
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersEfgartigimod-Efgartigimod0200
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo-Efgartigimod1132

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEfgartigimod-Efgartigimod020
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo-Efgartigimod013
Total, other adverse eventsEfgartigimod-Efgartigimod1320
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo-Efgartigimod1213
Total, serious adverse eventsEfgartigimod-Efgartigimod020
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo-Efgartigimod013

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Efgartigimod-Efgartigimod vs Placebo-Efgartigimod: Number of Participants With ADAs Against EfgartigimodTrial comparisons
Efgartigimod-Efgartigimod vs Placebo-Efgartigimod: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Efgartigimod-Efgartigimod vs Placebo-Efgartigimod: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05918978

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05918978/results?page=2