ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Study of the Impact of Non-pharmacological Techniques on Cognitive Complaints in Cancer Patients

NCT05943301, Not applicable, Withdrawn, University of Liege

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleStudy of the Impact of Non-pharmacological Techniques on Cognitive Complaints in Cancer PatientsClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT05943301ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusWithdrawnClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment0 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorUniversity of LiegeClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsNon-Metastatic NeoplasmClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsSelf-hypnosis/self-careClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2023-07-13ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2023-07-13ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 21

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryChange in subjective cognitive difficulties : Perceived cognitive impairmentsT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on the perceived cognitive impairments will be assessed by means of the subtest "Perceived cognitive impairments" of the Functionnal Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-COG; Wagner et al., 2009). Scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=never; 4=several times a day).
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in subjective cognitive difficulties : Comments by othersT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on the perceived cognitive impairments will be assessed by means of the subtest "Comments by others" of the Functionnal Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-COG; Wagner et al., 2009). Scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=never; 4=several times a day).
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in subjective cognitive difficulties : Perceived cognitive abilitiesT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on the perceived cognitive impairments will be assessed by means of the subtest "Perceived cognitive abilities" of the Functionnal Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-COG; Wagner et al., 2009). Scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all; 4=very much).
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in subjective cognitive difficulties : Impact on quality of lifeT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on the perceived cognitive impairments will be assessed by means of the subtest "Impact on quality of life" of the Functionnal Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-COG; Wagner et al., 2009). Scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all; 4=very much).
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in objective cognitive difficulties : Verbal long term memoryT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on verbal long term memory will be assessed by means the Buschke Selective Reminding Test (Buschke, 1973). According to the sex and the subject's age, the test gives us a score and the norms.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in objective cognitive difficulties : AttentionT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on attention abilities will be assessed by means of the subtest "Phasic alertness" of the Test of Attentional Performance 2.3.1 (Zimmermann \& Fimm, 2002). Computerized test, according to the sex and the subject's age, the test gives us a score and the norms.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in objective cognitive difficulties : Processing speedT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on processing speed abilities will be assessed by means of the first part of the Stroop test (Stroop, 1935). According to the sex and the subject's age, the test gives us a score and the norms.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in objective cognitvie difficulties : InhibitionT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on inhibition abilities will be assessed by means of the first part of the Stroop test (Stroop, 1935). According to the sex and the subject's age, the test gives us a score and the norms.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in objective cognitvie difficulties : mental flexibilityT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on mental flexibility abilities will be assessed by means of the subtest "Flexibility" of the Test of Attentional Performance 2.3.1 (Zimmermann \& Fimm, 2002). Computerized test, according to the sex and the subject's age, the test gives us a score and the norms.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in objective cognitvie difficulties : working memoryT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on mental flexibility abilities will be assessed by means of the subtest "Working memory" of the Test of Attentional Performance 2.3.1 (Zimmermann \& Fimm, 2002). Computerized test, according to the sex and the subject's age, the test gives us a score and the norms.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in objective cognitvie difficulties : executive functionsT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on executive functions will be assessed by means of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (David et al., 1948). According to the sex and the subject's age, the test gives us a score and the norms.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryImpact on return-to-workT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)For people who continued to work at time of recruitment, Work Design questionnaire will be administered Morgeson \& Hymphrey, 2006). Scale raging from 0 to 5 (0=not at all; 5=exactly).ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in emtional distress : AnxietyT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on anxiety and despression will be assessed by means of the Hopsital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Zigmond \& Snaith, 1983). Scale ranging from 0 to 3 (0=never; 4=always).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in emtional distress : DepressionT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on anxiety and despression will be assessed by means of the Hopsital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Zigmond \& Snaith, 1983). Scale ranging from 0 to 3 (0=alwaysr; 4=never).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in fatigue : General fatigueT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on fatigue will be assessed by means of the subscale "general fatigue" of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (Smets et al., 1995). Scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1=not agree at all; 4=agree completely).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in fatigue : Physical fatigueT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on fatigue will be assessed by means of the subscale "physical fatigue" of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (Smets et al., 1995). Scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1=not agree at all; 4=agree completely).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in fatigue : Mental fatigueT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on fatigue will be assessed by means of the subscale "mental fatigue" of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (Smets et al., 1995). Scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1=not agree at all; 4=agree completely).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in fatigue : Motivational decreaseT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)
The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on fatigue will be assessed by means of the subscale "motivational decrease" of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (Smets et al., 1995). Scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1=not agree at all; 4=agree completely).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in fatigueT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)The impact of self-hypnosis/self-care on fatigue will be assessed by means of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI; Smets et al., 1995) and an 1-week agenda.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in fatigue : Weekly agendaT1 (before the intervention), T2 (right after the intervention), T3 (3 months follow-up)Qualitative questionnaire concerning the sleep habits of participants. They have to give information concerning their sleeping habits.ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 3

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Card Sorting Test (Berg)Primary outcomeConductCognition
Selective Reminding TaskPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)