ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05968599

A Study to Learn About the Study Medicines Called Enzalutamide and Abiraterone in People With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

NCT05968599, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2026-02-25

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Learn About the Study Medicines Called Enzalutamide and Abiraterone in People With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. Trials, record NCT05968599. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05968599

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicines Called Enzalutamide and Abiraterone in People With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
NCT number
NCT05968599
Status
Completed
Enrollment
2,731 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
Interventions
Enzalutamide, Abiraterone acetate
First posted
2023-08-01
Last updated
2026-02-25
Results first posted
2026-02-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS): Adjusted Using Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW)From index date to date of death or censoring date, whichever occurred first (approximately 104.7 months); retrospective data retrieved and evaluated during approximately 18.7 months
OS was defined as the time from the initiation of enzalutamide or abiraterone (i.e., index date) to the date of death. Participants who did not die during this period were censored at their last available follow-up, which was defined as the earlier of end of data availability or last participant contact. Index date was defined as the date of initiation of enzalutamide or abiraterone and their index date was required to occur during the index period. Kaplan-Meier (weighted) method was used for analysis.
SecondaryOS Without Subsequent Therapy: Adjusted Using IPTWFrom index date to date of death or censoring date, whichever occurred first (approximately 104.7 months); retrospective data retrieved and evaluated during approximately 18.7 months
OS was defined as the time from the initiation of enzalutamide or abiraterone (i.e., index date) to the date of death. Participants who did not die during this period were censored at their last available follow-up, which was defined as the earlier of end of data availability or last participant contact. Index date was defined as the date of initiation of enzalutamide or abiraterone and their index date was required to occur during the index period. OS of only those participants who initiated abiraterone and enzalutamide on the index date and did not receive subsequent systemic anti-neoplastic therapy were reported in this outcome measure. Kaplan-Meier (weighted) method was used for analysis.
SecondaryTime to Treatment Discontinuation (TTD): Adjusted Using IPTW
From index date to date of treatment discontinuation or censoring date, whichever occurred first (approximately 104.7 months); retrospective data retrieved and evaluated during approximately 18.7 months
Treatment duration of the index treatment was defined as the time from the initiation of enzalutamide or abiraterone (i.e., index date) to the discontinuation date. Index date was defined as the date of initiation of enzalutamide or abiraterone and their index date was required to occur during the index period. Discontinuation was defined as the earliest of 1) death, 2) abstracted end date for last enzalutamide or abiraterone drug episode that started within the index treatment line of therapy (LOT) (drug episodes for abstracted oral therapies from the Flatiron Drug Episode table), or 3) day before the start of next LOT. Participants who did not discontinue were censored at their last available follow-up, which was defined as the earlier of end of data availability or last participant contact. Kaplan-Meier (weighted) method was used for analysis.
SecondaryTime to Subsequent Therapy (TTST): Adjusted Using IPTWFrom index date to date of start of next LOT or censoring date, whichever occurred first (approximately 104.7 months); retrospective data retrieved and evaluated during approximately 18.7 months
TTST was defined as the time from the initiation of enzalutamide or abiraterone (i.e., index date) to the start of next LOT. Index date was defined as the date of initiation of enzalutamide or abiraterone and their index date was required to occur during the index period. Participants who did not start a new LOT were censored at their last available follow-up, which was defined as the earliest of 1) death, 2) end of data availability or 3) last participant contact. Kaplan-Meier (weighted) method was used for analysis.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS): Adjusted Using Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW)From index date to date of death or censoring date, whichever occurred first (approximately 104.7 months); retrospective data retrieved and evaluated during approximately 18.7 months
Analysis population included all participants included in this study, and were adjusted for baseline confounders (demographics, clinical characteristics, prior treatments, comorbidities) using IPTW method. As numbers were adjusted using IPTW, pseudo set was derived. Hence, numbers reported against Overall Number of Participants Analyzed (N) for both the arms differ from the unadjusted (raw) numbers presented in participant flow and baseline characteristics section.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOS Without Subsequent Therapy: Adjusted Using IPTWFrom index date to date of death or censoring date, whichever occurred first (approximately 104.7 months); retrospective data retrieved and evaluated during approximately 18.7 months
Analysis population included a sub-set of participants included in this study, who did not receive subsequent systemic anti-neoplastic therapy. The evaluable number of participants for this outcome were adjusted for baseline confounders (demographics, clinical characteristics, prior treatments, comorbidities) using IPTW method. As numbers were adjusted using IPTW, pseudo sub-set was derived. Here, 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure after applying ITPW.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Treatment Discontinuation (TTD): Adjusted Using IPTW
From index date to date of treatment discontinuation or censoring date, whichever occurred first (approximately 104.7 months); retrospective data retrieved and evaluated during approximately 18.7 months
Analysis population included all participants included in this study, and were adjusted for baseline confounders (demographics, clinical characteristics, prior treatments, comorbidities) using IPTW method. As numbers were adjusted using IPTW, pseudo set was derived. Hence, numbers reported against Overall Number of Participants Analyzed for both the arms differ from the unadjusted (raw) numbers presented in participant flow and baseline characteristics section.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Subsequent Therapy (TTST): Adjusted Using IPTWFrom index date to date of start of next LOT or censoring date, whichever occurred first (approximately 104.7 months); retrospective data retrieved and evaluated during approximately 18.7 months
Analysis population included all participants included in this study, and were adjusted for baseline confounders (demographics, clinical characteristics, prior treatments, comorbidities) using IPTW method. As numbers were adjusted using IPTW, pseudo set was derived. Hence, numbers reported against Overall Number of Participants Analyzed for both the arms differ from the unadjusted (raw) numbers presented in participant flow and baseline characteristics section.
MonthsMEDIAN

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall Survival (OS): Adjusted Using Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW)Abiraterone24.6395% Confidence Interval 22.93 to 26.33Months
Overall Survival (OS): Adjusted Using Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW)Enzalutamide25.7795% Confidence Interval 24.30 to 27.60Months
OS Without Subsequent Therapy: Adjusted Using IPTWAbiraterone Only14.0395% Confidence Interval 12.37 to 15.63Months
OS Without Subsequent Therapy: Adjusted Using IPTWEnzalutamide Only17.7395% Confidence Interval 14.87 to 20.83Months
Time to Treatment Discontinuation (TTD): Adjusted Using IPTWAbiraterone7.8795% Confidence Interval 7.10 to 8.50Months
Time to Treatment Discontinuation (TTD): Adjusted Using IPTWEnzalutamide9.5095% Confidence Interval 8.67 to 10.13Months
Time to Subsequent Therapy (TTST): Adjusted Using IPTWAbiraterone14.7095% Confidence Interval 13.47 to 16.27Months
Time to Subsequent Therapy (TTST): Adjusted Using IPTWEnzalutamide17.9095% Confidence Interval 16.40 to 19.80Months

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAbiraterone1,316
Overall StudySTARTEDEnzalutamide1,415
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAbiraterone1,316
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEnzalutamide1,415
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAbiraterone0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEnzalutamide0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAbiraterone1,0071,316
Total, all-cause mortalityEnzalutamide1,0361,415
Total, other adverse eventsAbiraterone00
Total, other adverse eventsEnzalutamide00
Total, serious adverse eventsAbiraterone00
Total, serious adverse eventsEnzalutamide00

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
42864777DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Abiraterone vs Enzalutamide: deaths from any cause

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05968599

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05968599/registered