ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT06059846

A Study of Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) Compared to Intravenous Imipenem-cilastatin in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)

NCT06059846, Phase 3, Completed, Spero Therapeutics; results first posted 2026-03-10

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) Compared to Intravenous Imipenem-cilastatin in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP). Trials, record NCT06059846. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT06059846

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) Compared to Intravenous Imipenem-cilastatin in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)
NCT number
NCT06059846
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,690 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Spero Therapeutics
Conditions
Urinary Tract Infection, Acute Pyelonephritis
Interventions
TBP-PI-HBr, Imipenem-cilastatin, Dummy Infusion, Dummy Tablets
First posted
2023-09-29
Last updated
2026-03-10
Results first posted
2026-03-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes20

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Overall Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (Micro-ITT) PopulationAt Day 17 (TOC)
Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Overall Response (Combined Per-Participant Clinical Cure and Favorable Microbiological Response) at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationAt Day 17 (TOC)
Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Overall Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-Up (LFU) Visits in the Micro-ITT PopulationAt Day 10 (EOT) and Day 28 (LFU)
Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Overall Response at EOT and LFU Visits in the ME PopulationAt Day 10 (EOT) and Day 28 (LFU)
Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT PopulationAt Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
Clinical response at EOT and TOC is based on the Investigator's assessment of changes in baseline cUTI/AP signs and symptoms. Clinical cure: complete resolution or marked improvement of baseline symptoms with no new symptoms and no need for additional antimicrobial therapy. Clinical failure: baseline symptoms not fully resolved, new symptoms occur requiring non-study antibiotics, or death. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify response (e.g., lost to follow-up or missing data). Clinical response at LFU is based on change from baseline. Cure, including sustained clinical cure: met cure criteria at TOC and remained free of new or recurrent cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU with no need for further antibiotics. Failure, including clinical relapse: met cure criteria at TOC but developed new cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU requiring antibiotics. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify as sustained cure or relapse.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the CE PopulationAt Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
Clinical response at EOT and TOC is based on the Investigator's assessment of changes in baseline cUTI/AP signs and symptoms. Clinical cure: complete resolution or marked improvement of baseline symptoms with no new symptoms and no need for additional antimicrobial therapy. Clinical failure: baseline symptoms not fully resolved, new symptoms occur requiring non-study antibiotics, or death. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify response (e.g., lost to follow-up or missing data). Clinical response at LFU is based on change from baseline. Cure, including sustained clinical cure: met cure criteria at TOC and remained free of new or recurrent cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU with no need for further antibiotics. Failure, including clinical relapse: met cure criteria at TOC but developed new cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU requiring antibiotics. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify as sustained cure or relapse.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME PopulationAt Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
Clinical response at EOT and TOC is based on the Investigator's assessment of changes in baseline cUTI/AP signs and symptoms. Clinical cure: complete resolution or marked improvement of baseline symptoms with no new symptoms and no need for additional antimicrobial therapy. Clinical failure: baseline symptoms not fully resolved, new symptoms occur requiring non-study antibiotics, or death. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify response (e.g., lost to follow-up or missing data). Clinical response at LFU is based on change from baseline. Cure, including sustained clinical cure: met cure criteria at TOC and remained free of new or recurrent cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU with no need for further antibiotics. Failure, including clinical relapse: met cure criteria at TOC but developed new cUTI/AP symptoms at LFU requiring antibiotics. Clinical indeterminate: insufficient data to classify as sustained cure or relapse.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT PopulationAt Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
Participants were evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as: Eradication, defined as reduction of Baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL on urine culture and negative repeated blood culture (if blood culture was positive at Baseline) ;Persistence, defined as Isolation from urine culture of ≥10\^3 CFU/mL or from blood of any of the Baseline uropathogen(s) identified at study entry; Indeterminate: no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME PopulationAt Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)
Participants were evaluated for microbiological response based on blood and urine cultures as: Eradication, defined as reduction of baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL on urine culture and negative repeated blood culture (if blood culture was positive at Baseline); Persistence, defined as Isolation from urine culture of ≥10\^3 CFU/mL or from blood of any of the Baseline uropathogen(s) identified at study entry; Indeterminate: no follow-up urine culture is available, or urine culture results are missing, or follow-up urine culture cannot be interpreted for any reason.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT PopulationDay 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)
Overall response includes combined clinical cure plus microbiological eradication. Clinical cure is defined as a complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of cUTI or AP present at baseline and no new symptoms, such that no further antibacterial therapy is warranted, and participant is alive. Microbiological eradication (favorable microbiological response) is defined as a reduction of baseline uropathogens to \<10\^3 CFU/mL and negative repeated blood culture if blood culture was positive for uropathogen growth at baseline and participant is alive.

Outcomes20

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Overall Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (Micro-ITT) PopulationAt Day 17 (TOC)
The micro-ITT population includes randomized participants with ≥ 10\^5 CFU/mL of an imipenem-susceptible Enterobacterales uropathogen, no other pathogens except an additional Enterobacterales species, E. faecalis, S. aureus, or S. saprophyticus at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL, and no more than two microorganisms in the baseline urine culture. In this outcome measure, data reported is at the TOC timepoint only.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Overall Response (Combined Per-Participant Clinical Cure and Favorable Microbiological Response) at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationAt Day 17 (TOC)
The ME population includes participants who meet the definition for both the micro-ITT and clinically evaluable (CE) populations. Three ME populations are defined - at EOT (ME-EOT), TOC (ME-TOC), and LFU (ME-LFU). In this outcome measure, data is reported for categories at the TOC timepoint only.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Overall Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-Up (LFU) Visits in the Micro-ITT PopulationAt Day 10 (EOT) and Day 28 (LFU)
The micro-ITT population includes randomized participants with ≥ 10\^5 CFU/mL of an imipenem-susceptible Enterobacterales uropathogen, no other pathogens except an additional Enterobacterales species, E. faecalis, S. aureus, or S. saprophyticus at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL, and no more than two microorganisms in the baseline urine culture. In this outcome measure, data is reported for categories at EOT and LFU timepoints only.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Overall Response at EOT and LFU Visits in the ME PopulationAt Day 10 (EOT) and Day 28 (LFU)
The ME population includes participants who meet the definition for both the micro-ITT and clinically evaluable (CE) populations. Three ME populations are defined - at EOT (ME-EOT), TOC (ME-TOC), and LFU (ME-LFU). Here, 'number analyzed' indicates the number of participants analyzed at the specified visit. In this outcome measure, data is reported for categories at EOT and LFU timepoints only.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT PopulationAt Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
The micro-ITT population includes randomized participants with ≥ 10\^5 CFU/mL of an imipenem-susceptible Enterobacterales uropathogen, no other pathogens except an additional Enterobacterales species, E. faecalis, S. aureus, or S. saprophyticus at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL, and no more than two microorganisms in the baseline urine culture.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the CE PopulationAt Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
The CE population includes participants in the ITT Population or all randomized participants, with no major protocol deviations who received ≥8 doses of study drug (or \<8 if discontinued due to AE or death), had ≥80% treatment compliance, achieved clinical cure or failure at EOT, TOC, or LFU, had a cUTI/AP diagnosis, and did not violate prior antibiotic use criteria. Here, 'number analyzed' indicates the number of participants analyzed at the specified visit.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME PopulationAt Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
The ME population includes participants who meet the definition for both the micro-ITT and CE populations. Three ME populations are defined - at EOT (ME-EOT), TOC (ME-TOC), and LFU (ME-LFU). Here, 'number analyzed' indicates the number of participants analyzed at the specified visit.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the Micro-ITT PopulationAt Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC), and Day 28 (LFU)
The micro-ITT population includes randomized participants with ≥ 10\^5 CFU/mL of an imipenem-susceptible Enterobacterales uropathogen, no other pathogens except an additional Enterobacterales species, E. faecalis, S. aureus, or S. saprophyticus at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL, and no more than two microorganisms in the baseline urine culture.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits in the ME PopulationAt Day 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)
The ME population includes participants who meet the definition for both the micro-ITT and CE populations. Three ME populations are defined - at EOT (ME-EOT), TOC (ME-TOC), and LFU (ME-LFU). Here, 'number analyzed' indicates the number of participants analyzed at the specified visit.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Overall Response at EOT, TOC, and LFU Visits in Participants With Drug-Resistant Enterobacterales in Micro-ITT PopulationDay 10 (EOT), Day 17 (TOC) and Day 28 (LFU)
The micro-ITT population includes randomized participants with ≥ 10\^5 CFU/mL of an imipenem-susceptible Enterobacterales uropathogen, no other pathogens except an additional Enterobacterales species, E. faecalis, S. aureus, or S. saprophyticus at ≥10\^5 CFU/mL, and no more than two microorganisms in the baseline urine culture. Here, 'number analyzed' indicates the number of participants analyzed at the specified visit.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group378

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (Micro-ITT) PopulationTBP-PI-HBrResponder261Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (Micro-ITT) PopulationImipenem-cilastatinResponder291Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (Micro-ITT) PopulationTBP-PI-HBrNon-responder171Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (Micro-ITT) PopulationImipenem-cilastatinNon-responder179Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (Micro-ITT) PopulationTBP-PI-HBrIndeterminate14Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response at the Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (Micro-ITT) PopulationImipenem-cilastatinIndeterminate13Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response (Combined Per-Participant Clinical Cure and Favorable Microbiological Response) at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationTBP-PI-HBrResponder250Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response (Combined Per-Participant Clinical Cure and Favorable Microbiological Response) at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationImipenem-cilastatinResponder282Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response (Combined Per-Participant Clinical Cure and Favorable Microbiological Response) at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationTBP-PI-HBrNon-responder160Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Response (Combined Per-Participant Clinical Cure and Favorable Microbiological Response) at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) PopulationImipenem-cilastatinNon-responder170Participants

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTBP-PI-HBr844
Overall StudySTARTEDImipenem-cilastatin846
Overall StudyITT PopulationTBP-PI-HBr844
Overall StudyITT PopulationImipenem-cilastatin846
Overall StudyMicro-ITT PopulationTBP-PI-HBr446
Overall StudyMicro-ITT PopulationImipenem-cilastatin483
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTBP-PI-HBr810
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDImipenem-cilastatin818
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTBP-PI-HBr34
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDImipenem-cilastatin28

Adverse events92

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersTBP-PI-HBr68843
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersImipenem-cilastatin23844
seriousCardiac failureCardiac disordersTBP-PI-HBr0843
seriousCardiac failureCardiac disordersImipenem-cilastatin2844
seriousUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsTBP-PI-HBr6843
seriousUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsImipenem-cilastatin3844
seriousPneumoniaInfections and infestationsTBP-PI-HBr0843
seriousPneumoniaInfections and infestationsImipenem-cilastatin3844
seriousClostridium difficile colitisInfections and infestationsTBP-PI-HBr0843
seriousClostridium difficile colitisInfections and infestationsImipenem-cilastatin2844

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTBP-PI-HBr2843
Total, all-cause mortalityImipenem-cilastatin2844
Total, other adverse eventsTBP-PI-HBr68843
Total, other adverse eventsImipenem-cilastatin23844
Total, serious adverse eventsTBP-PI-HBr29843
Total, serious adverse eventsImipenem-cilastatin22844

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
TBP-PI-HBr vs Imipenem-cilastatin: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
TBP-PI-HBr vs Imipenem-cilastatin: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06059846

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06059846/results?page=2