ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT06294925

A Study to Learn About the Effectiveness of Etrasimod in People With Ulcerative Colitis

NCT06294925, Active not recruiting, Pfizer

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Learn About the Effectiveness of Etrasimod in People With Ulcerative Colitis. Trials, record NCT06294925. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT06294925

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Learn About the Effectiveness of Etrasimod in People With Ulcerative Colitis
NCT number
NCT06294925
Status
Active not recruiting
Enrollment
360 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Colitis, Ulcerative
Interventions
Etrasimod
First posted
2024-03-06
Last updated
2026-11-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProportion of patients with symptomatic remissionWeek 12
Symptomatic remission was defined as stool frequency sub score (SFS)= 0 (or = 1 with a ≥ 1-point decrease from baseline) and rectal bleeding sub score (RBS) =0.. Stool frequency score and rectal bleeding score are components of the Patient-Reported Outcome-2 score derived based on components of Mayo score (PRO2): instrument designed to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. Total score range: stool frequency 0 to 3 and rectal bleeding 0 to 3; higher score=more severe disease.
PrimaryProportion of patients with symptomatic remissionWeek 52
Symptomatic remission was defined as stool frequency sub score (SFS)= 0 (or = 1 with a ≥ 1-point decrease from baseline) and rectal bleeding sub score (RBS) =0.. Stool frequency score and rectal bleeding score are components of the Patient-Reported Outcome-2 score derived based on components of Mayo score (PRO2): instrument designed to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. Total score range: stool frequency 0 to 3 and rectal bleeding 0 to 3; higher score=more severe disease.
SecondaryProportion of patients with clinical responseWeek 12Clinical response was defined as decrease of at least 20% in Patient-Reported Outcome-2 score derived based on components of Mayo score (PRO2) from baseline or achievement of symptomatic remission.
SecondaryProportion of patients with clinical response.Week 52Clinical response was defined as decrease of at least 20% in Patient-Reported Outcome-2 score derived based on components of Mayo score (PRO2) from baseline or achievement of symptomatic remission.
SecondaryProportion of corticosteroid-free patients with symptomatic remissionWeek 52
Symptomatic remission was defined as stool frequency sub score (SFS)= 0 (or = 1 with a ≥ 1-point decrease from baseline) and rectal bleeding sub score (RBS) =0.. Stool frequency score and rectal bleeding score are components of the Patient-Reported Outcome-2 score derived based on components of Mayo score (PRO2): instrument designed to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. Total score range: stool frequency 0 to 3 and rectal bleeding 0 to 3; higher score=more severe disease. Patients have to be corticosteroid-free for at least 12 weeks prior to the visit.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
41448713DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06294925

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06294925/registered