Trial · NCT06301698
The Effectiveness of Stellate Ganglion Block in Managing Dysphagia in Patients With Medullary Infarction
NCT06301698, Not applicable, Unknown, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. The Effectiveness of Stellate Ganglion Block in Managing Dysphagia in Patients With Medullary Infarction. Trials, record NCT06301698. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT06301698
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- The Effectiveness of Stellate Ganglion Block in Managing Dysphagia in Patients With Medullary Infarction
- NCT number
- NCT06301698
- Status
- Unknown
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 80 participants, estimated
- Lead sponsor
- Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital
- Conditions
- Bulbar Palsy
- Interventions
- Comprehensive rehabilitation, Injection, Lidocaine Hydrochloride
- First posted
- 2024-03-08
- Last updated
- 2024-03-12
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes4
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Penetration-Aspiration Scale | day 1 and day 10 | Penetration-Aspiration Scale was used to assess dysphagia under Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study, primarily evaluating the extent to which fluid food entered the airway and caused penetration or aspiration during the swallowing process. As the level increased, the severity of dysphagia also increased. |
| Secondary | Functional Oral Intake Scale | day 1 and day 10 | During Dysphagia-Functional Oral Intake Scale assessment, evaluators engage in communication with the patient, conduct observations, and make records to assess the patient's oral intake ability. The Functional Oral Intake Scale assessment form includes seven levels of scoring, ranging from level 1 to level 7, indicating a progressive improvement in the patient's oral intake ability. In general, the result below level 6 indicates unsafe for oral intake while level 6 and above indicates that eating via mouth can be safely conducted. |
| Secondary | Murray secretion severity scale | day 1 and day 10 | Murray secretion severity scale is used for assessment of Pharyngeal secretion. The result was divided into 0-3 levels (0, normal; 1, a small amount of secretion remained and not entering the laryngeal vestibule; 2: temporary accumulation in the laryngeal vestibule; 3: persistent accumulation in the laryngeal vestibule. A higher score indicates the worse dysphagia. |
| Secondary | Yale pharyngeal residue severity rating scale | day 1 and day 10 | The Yale pharyngeal residue severity rating scale was recruited for assessment of Pharyngeal residue.The result would be divided into 5 levels (1, no residue; 2, the covered pharyngeal mucosa; 3, mild residue, less than 50%; 4, moderate residue, more than 50%; 5, severe residue, spillage from laryngeal vestibule observed). A higher score indicates the worse dysphagia. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06301698
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06301698/registered