ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT06364072

Safety, Tolerability, Analgesic Effect, and Feasibility of Intranasal CT001 in Pediatric Patients

NCT06364072, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, Cessatech A/S; results first posted 2026-02-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety, Tolerability, Analgesic Effect, and Feasibility of Intranasal CT001 in Pediatric Patients. Trials, record NCT06364072. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT06364072

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety, Tolerability, Analgesic Effect, and Feasibility of Intranasal CT001 in Pediatric Patients
NCT number
NCT06364072
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
155 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Cessatech A/S
Conditions
Pain
Interventions
CT001
First posted
2024-04-15
Last updated
2026-02-02
Results first posted
2026-02-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimarySedationAt baseline and 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 and 60 min after first IMP administration. If a second IMP dose was needed, sedation score was performed at the timepoints relative to first IMP administration.
Sedation was assessed by sedation score on the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). Scores range from 0 to 4, where 0 = awake/alert, 1 = minimally sedated (tired/sleepy, appropriate response to verbal conversation and/or sound), 2 = moderately sedated (somnolent/sleeping, easily aroused with light tactile stimulation or simple verbal command), 3 = deeply sedated (deep sleep, arousable only with significant physical stimulation), and 4 = unarousable. Lower scores indicate less sedation; higher scores indicate deeper sedation.
PrimaryRespiratory DepressionAt baseline and 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 45, 60 and 75 min after IMP administration.Respiratory depression assessed by respiratory rate.
PrimaryPeripheral Oxygen SaturationAt baseline and 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 45, 60 and 75 min after IMP administration.Peripheral oxygen saturation assessed by oxygen saturation rate (%)
PrimaryCardiovascular StabilityAt baseline and 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 45, 60 and 75 min after IMP administration.Cardiovascular stability assessed by pulse rate (bpm)
PrimaryNumber of Reported Adverse EventsThrough study completion; up to 7 daysNumber of reported adverse events.
PrimaryNumber of Adverse Events (AEs) Reported Per ParticipantThrough study completion; up to 7 daysNumber of adverse events (AEs) reported per participant.
PrimaryLocal Nasal Irritation30 and 60 min post IMP administrationThe number of participants with nasal irritation was summarised using counts of participants for each timepoint (30 and 60 min post IMP administration) by type of nasal irritation.
PrimaryAnalgesic EffectAt baseline and at 15 and 30 min post first IMP dose
Number and proportion of participants that respond to the treatment relative to baseline (i.e. reduction in pain score to 4 or below). Pain intensity was assessed with age-appropriate validated scales. Ages ≥1-\<5years: FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability), total score 0-10 (0=no pain, 10=severe pain). Ages ≥5-\<9years: Wong-Baker FACES, categories 0,2,4,6,8,10 (range 0-10; higher=worse pain). Ages ≥9years: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 (0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable).
SecondaryTreatment SatisfactionPrior to Emergency Department discharge (day of IMP administration)
Treatment satisfaction as assessed by responses to the question: "How satisfied are you with the study drug that you/your child received? Please think about how it helped their pain, how it was given, any side effects, and how quickly you/your child recovered". Respondents answered using a 5-point Likert scale (very unsatisfied (1), unsatisfied (2), neutral (3), satisfied (4), very satisfied (5)).
SecondaryFeasibility (Acceptance of Nasal Administration)Prior to Emergency Department discharge (day of IMP administration)
Feasibility (i.e. acceptance of nasal administration) was addressed by the healthcare staff asking the participant: "If you were in this situation again and needed pain medication, would you like to receive the nasal spray (relative to an injection, tablet or suppository for the pain)?' If not possible by the participant, the parent/legal guardian assessed nasal acceptability. Answers were "yes, "no", "I don't know".

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYSedationAt baseline and 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 and 60 min after first IMP administration. If a second IMP dose was needed, sedation score was performed at the timepoints relative to first IMP administration.Some participants had missing or non-assessable UMSS scores (e.g., early withdrawal, assessment not performed within the prespecified window, or incomplete data).UMSS scoreMEDIAN
PRIMARYRespiratory DepressionAt baseline and 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 45, 60 and 75 min after IMP administration.
The number analyzed differs across rows because pain intensity was assessed using age-appropriate scales, and not all participants had evaluable measurements at each time point. Some participants had missing or non-assessable pain scores (e.g., early withdrawal, assessment not performed within the prespecified window, or incomplete data), so they were excluded from the affected row(s), while remaining in the overall analyzed population.
Respiratory rate (rpm)MEDIAN
SECONDARYTreatment SatisfactionPrior to Emergency Department discharge (day of IMP administration)Treatment satistaction scoreMEDIAN
PRIMARYPeripheral Oxygen SaturationAt baseline and 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 45, 60 and 75 min after IMP administration.
The number analyzed differs across rows because pain intensity was assessed using age-appropriate scales, and not all participants had evaluable measurements at each time point. Some participants had missing or non-assessable pain scores (e.g., early withdrawal, assessment not performed within the prespecified window, or incomplete data), so they were excluded from the affected row(s), while remaining in the overall analyzed population.
Oxygen saturation rate (%)MEDIAN
PRIMARYCardiovascular StabilityAt baseline and 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 45, 60 and 75 min after IMP administration.
The number analyzed differs across rows because pain intensity was assessed using age-appropriate scales, and not all participants had evaluable measurements at each time point. Some participants had missing or non-assessable pain scores (e.g., early withdrawal, assessment not performed within the prespecified window, or incomplete data), so they were excluded from the affected row(s), while remaining in the overall analyzed population.
Beats per minuteMEDIAN
PRIMARYNumber of Reported Adverse EventsThrough study completion; up to 7 daysAdverse eventsNUMBER
PRIMARYNumber of Adverse Events (AEs) Reported Per ParticipantThrough study completion; up to 7 daysAdverse event per participantNUMBER
SECONDARYFeasibility (Acceptance of Nasal Administration)Prior to Emergency Department discharge (day of IMP administration)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYMedication ErrorsAssessed immediately post IMP administrationParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMaximum Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Within 30 Min Post (First) IMP Administration.30 min post (first) IMP administrationScores on a scaleMEDIAN

Results by group131

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
SedationCT001Baseline0Inter-Quartile Range 0 to 0UMSS score
SedationCT00110 min0Inter-Quartile Range 0 to 1UMSS score
SedationCT00115 min1Inter-Quartile Range 0 to 1UMSS score
SedationCT00120 min1Inter-Quartile Range 0 to 1UMSS score
SedationCT00130 min1Inter-Quartile Range 0 to 1UMSS score
SedationCT00145 min0Inter-Quartile Range 0 to 1UMSS score
SedationCT00160 min0Inter-Quartile Range 0 to 1UMSS score
Respiratory DepressionCT001Age 1- <5 years, baseline26Standard Deviation 6.09Respiratory rate (rpm)
Respiratory DepressionCT001Age 1- <5 years, 10 min24Standard Deviation 5.67Respiratory rate (rpm)
Respiratory DepressionCT001Age 1- <5 years, 15 min24Standard Deviation 5.27Respiratory rate (rpm)

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCT001155
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCT001154
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCT0011

Adverse events27

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherLacrimation increasedEye disordersCT0011155
otherVision blurredEye disordersCT0011155
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersCT0011155
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersCT00114155
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersCT00125155
otherProduct use complaintInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsCT00119155
otherDecreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disordersCT0011155
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersCT00122155
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersCT0011155
otherHypoaesthesiaNervous system disordersCT0011155

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCT0010155
Total, other adverse eventsCT00173155
Total, serious adverse eventsCT0014155

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06364072

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06364072/results?page=2