ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Effect Of Functional Balance Exercise İn Elderly

NCT06383676, Not applicable, Completed, Tarsus University

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleEffect Of Functional Balance Exercise İn ElderlyClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT06383676ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment31 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorTarsus UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsOlder People, ExerciseClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsFunctional reaction balance training, Functional balance trainingClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2024-04-25ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2024-12-27ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Eight weeks
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a brief instrument developed for the screening of milder forms of cognitive impairment. A score is derived by summing the points from each successfully completed task, for a total range from 0 to 30 points; higher scores indicate better cognitive performance. The MoCA was developed to screen milder forms of cognitive impairment through the assessment of a wide range of cognitive functions, such as short-term memory, executive functions, visuospatial abilities, language, attention, concentration, working memory, and temporal and spatial orientation. It comprises a 1-page test, which requires a short administration time (10-15 minutes).
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryStroop TestEight weeks
The test consists of two cards, each containing 60 items, presented in six rows of 10 items. On the first card, there are small rectangles (0.5 x 1 cm) printed in red, green and blue. The second card contains names of the three colours (i.e., red, green and blue) printed in incongruent colours (e.g., the word 'red' is printed in blue ink). The Stroop test Çapa version consists of three parts: Stroop A, Stroop B and Stroop C. Stroop A. The first part of the test requires individuals to name the colours (i.e., red, green and blue) of the small rectangles as quickly as possible, following a sequence from left to right. If any sign of colour blindness or colour naming deficits is present, the test is discontinued. Stroop B. The second part of the test requires individuals to read as fast as possible the colour names (i.e., red, green, and blue) that are printed in incongruent ink colours. The Stroop test Çapa version consists of three parts: Stroop A, Stroop B and Stroop C. Stroop A. The
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryThe Simple Reaction TimeEight weeks
The simple reaction time is measured using an electronic timing system (including a digital display, a light, and a button, and the protocol that has been described in the literature was followed . Each older is seated so that the resting arm was on the table in a quiet environment. The testing side's second index is placed 1 cm away from the button of the device. Then, the participants are asked to press the button when the visual or auditory input appeared. A total of 10 repetitions are recorded, and the mean score of the last 5 tests is further analyzed .. The visual and auditory reaction time is randomly assigned. The reaction time is recorded with 1/1,000 seconds of sensitivity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryThe Four Square Step Test (FSST)Eight weeks
The Four Square Step Test (FSST) has been widely used for evaluating dynamic balance in older populations. The FSST requires a stopwatch and four single-point sticks (SPS). Using the sticks resting flat on the floor to form a cross, the subject starts in one square, steps in one direction into each of the four squares, and then reverses direction back to the start.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryThe short physical performance battery (SPPB)Eight weeks
The short physical performance battery (SPPB) is a quick and useful tool for fall risk stratification among older primary care patients. The SPPB, a 3-part performance-based test (gait time, chair stand, and balance), was assessed at baseline. Each test is scored from 0 (inability to perform the task) to 4 points (best test performance) . The SPPB total score ranges from 0 (worst performance) to 12 points (best performance) and categorically evaluates performance in the tests using three or four classes of scores: three classes: 0-6 points (poor performance),
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTimed Up and Go Test (TUG)Eight weeks
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) has been recommended as a simple fall risk screening tool, primarily to identify people warranting more-detailed assessment of gait and balance. Measures the time taken (in seconds) for a person to rise from a chair with armrests, walk 3 meters with usual assistive devices, turn, return to the chair, and sit down
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryFalls Efficacy Scale ( FES)Eight weeks
Falls Efficacy Scale is widely used 16-item Falls Efficacy Scale (FES) evaluate the social dimension of fear of falling and refers almost exclusively to very basic activities of daily living, making it insensitive when used in active older persons. Each item is scored on a four-point scale: 1 = not at all concerned, 2 = somewhat concerned, 3 = fairly concerned and 4 = very concerned. A summary score is calculated by adding the score of each item, giving a scale ranging from 16 to 64 for the 16-item FES-I and from 7 to 28 for the seven-item FES-I. A low score indicates low fear of falling
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMini-BESTest: Balance Evaluation Systems TestEight weeks
The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a relatively new multi-task balance assessment developed to identify specific postural control problems (i.e., biomechanical constraints, stability limits, postural responses, anticipatory postural adjustments, sensory orientation, dynamic balance during gait, and cognitive effect). The Mini-BESTest is a 14-item performance-based measure of balance disorders.The total score ranged from 0 to 28, with higher scores denoting better balance ability.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 2

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Simple Reaction TimePrimary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)