ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Examining the Effect of Lateralization Imagery Training on EEG Brain Oscillations in Individuals With Chronic Neck Pain

NCT06679335, Not applicable, Completed, Bahçeşehir University

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleExamining the Effect of Lateralization Imagery Training on EEG Brain Oscillations in Individuals With Chronic Neck PainClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT06679335ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment34 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorBahçeşehir UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsChronic Pain, Neck PainClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsLateralization Imagery TrainingClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2024-11-07ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2025-12-09ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryCognitive Status Assessment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment: MoCA)Baseline
It will be used to evaluate the cognitive status of individuals and to exclude participants from the study. It is a test that aims to evaluate participants in 7 cognitive aspects such as attention, concentration, memory, language, calculation, spatial-visual skills, reasoning and orientation. It takes approximately ten minutes. The highest score that can be obtained from the test is 30. The cognitive level of the participant who scores 21 points or above is considered normal. Turkish validity-reliability study was conducted by Özdilek and Kenangil in 2014.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryStroop test (quick)Baseline, and up to 4 weeks
It is a cognitive control test consisting of three parts developed by J. R. Stroop in 1935. The Stroop task and related tests are considered the gold standard of attention measurements in the literature. In the first part of the test, subjects are presented with color names and asked to read them as quickly as possible. In the second part, you are asked to say the colors of dot clusters printed with colored ink as quickly as possible. In the third part, the students are asked to read the words written in ink of a different color than the name of the presented color as quickly (and loudly) as possible. The Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Karakaş et al. in 1999.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryMotor Imagery AssessmentBaseline
Made using the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the questionnaire was conducted by Dilek et al. It was made by. It consists of 3 subscales and a total of 12 items that evaluate external visual imagery, internal visual imagery, and kinesthetic imagery. Each of the 12 tasks in the survey is first performed physically, then the participant returns to the starting position and imagery is performed according to the desired type of imagery. Scoring is made between 1 and 7, with "1 point: very difficult to see/feel, 7 points: very easy to see/feel." When calculating the score, internal visual imagery, external visual imagery and kinesthetic imagery scores are added separately, divided by 4 and averaged to obtain the score of each subscale.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryPain IntensityBaseline, and up to 4 weeks
Individuals' pain intensity will be evaluated subjectively with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale consists of a 10 cm linear line. The starting point of the line is 0, no pain; The endpoint of 10 is the worst pain ever experienced in life; 5 indicates moderate pain. People will be asked to numerically rate the severity of their pain on the scale.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryKinesiophobia AssessmentBaseline, and up to 4 weeks
Fear of movement will be evaluated with the TAMPA kinesiophobia scale (TKÖ). TAS is a questionnaire consisting of 17 questions developed by Korietal in 1991 for musculoskeletal pain. This scale includes parameters for injury/re-injury and fear avoidance in activities related to . In this scale, each question was scored as (1 = disagree, 4 = strongly agree). While scoring, items 4, 8, 12 and 16 are reversed and then the total score is obtained. The person receives a total score between 17-68. The Turkish reliability of the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale was conducted by Yılmaz et al.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryEvaluation of Neck DisabilityBaseline, and up to 4 weeks
The extent to which individuals' chronic neck pain affects their daily living activities will be evaluated with the Neck Disability Index (NEI). The Turkish validity and reliability of the index was determined by Telci et al. The index, which evaluates subjective symptoms and activities of daily living, consists of a total of 10 sections (pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headache, concentration, work life, driving, sleep and leisure activities). There are 6 options for each section, ranging from 0 to 5 points. The total score varies between 0 and 50 (0: no disability; 50: maximum disability), and an increase in the total score indicates that the disability increases. In the evaluation in our study, the percentage of each score will be calculated to obtain an equal score distribution in case the patients do not answer some questions. 8 percent and below is considered "no excuse".
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryProprioception Sense TestBaseline, and up to 4 weeks
Cervical joint position error will be measured using the Dualer IQ digital inclinometer (J-Tech Medical, Midvale, UT, USA). Digital inclinometer spine assessment protocols are well established and approved by the American Medical Association. Digital inclinometer allows clinicians to evaluate range of motion and proprioception using dynamic inclinometry similar to that used in other goniometric protocols. Digital inclinometer has demonstrated test-retest reliability for measuring spinal range of motion.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryBody Awareness AssessmentBaseline, and up to 4 weeks
Individuals' neck awareness will be assessed with the Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire. Developed by Benedict Wand, its Turkish validity and reliability were confirmed by Onan et al. Likert type assessing individual-specific altered perception (0 = I never/never feel like this, 1= I rarely feel like this, 2 = Sometimes, or some of the time I feel like this, 3 = I often feel like this, 4 = I always or most of the time feel like this) It is a simple survey. The survey asks individuals 9 questions, such as how they perceive their neck in relation to their body and how they perceive their body position.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryEEG power in alpha, theta, beta bandBaseline, and up to 4 weeksEvaluation of brain oscillations with EEG analysis.ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 36

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
686873BACKGROUNDPubMed
10025021BACKGROUNDPubMed
10913710BACKGROUNDPubMed
11673934BACKGROUNDPubMed
12221179BACKGROUNDPubMed
14670576BACKGROUNDPubMed
15166100BACKGROUNDPubMed
15210879BACKGROUNDPubMed
15817019BACKGROUNDPubMed
16792279BACKGROUNDPubMed
17082465BACKGROUNDPubMed
17702636BACKGROUNDPubMed
18180194BACKGROUNDPubMed
18204400BACKGROUNDPubMed
19770615BACKGROUNDPubMed
21234168BACKGROUNDPubMed
21306870BACKGROUNDPubMed
23357411BACKGROUNDPubMed
23583615BACKGROUNDPubMed
24176780BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Stroop Color-Word TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)