ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

The Effects of Cannabidiol on the Driving Performance of Healthy Adults by Dose and Sex

NCT06686914, Phase 1, Recruiting, West Virginia University

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleThe Effects of Cannabidiol on the Driving Performance of Healthy Adults by Dose and SexClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT06686914ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusRecruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesPhase 1ClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment300 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorWest Virginia UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsCannabidiol Effects, Driving PerformanceClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsCannabidiol (CBD) Oil 300mg, Cannabidiol (CBD) Oil 150mg, Placebo OilClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2024-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-10-06ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 48

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryMean standard deviation of lateral position150 minutes post intervention
The driving simulator will measure mean standard deviation which is the amount a driver is weaving within the lane during the drive. Ranges from 0 to infinity, with higher means indicating worse performance.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryNumber of collisions150 minutes post intervention
The driving simulator will measure how many times a participant crashes into other vehicles, signs, pedestrians, etc. during the simulation. Ranges from 0 to infinity, with higher numbers indicating worse performance.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryMean reaction time to stimuli150 minutes post intervention
The driving simulator will measure the mean reaction time (seconds) that it takes for a person to brake when exposed to stimuli. Ranges from 0 to infinity, with higher means indicating worse performance.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryPercent of time driver is out of travel lane150 minutes post interventionThe driving simulator will measure the percent of time that each driver spends driving outside their travel lane. Percent ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating worse performance.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondarySelf-reported sleepiness scalebaseline
Sleepiness will be assessed via the Stanford Sleepiness Scale which is a one question Likert scale question that ask a person's sleepiness level at that moment in time. The scale ranges from 1-7 with higher scores indicating more sleepiness. This test will be administered on a laptop.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondarySelf-reported sleepiness scale200 minutes post intervention
Sleepiness will be assessed via the Stanford Sleepiness Scale which is a one question Likert scale question that ask a person's sleepiness level at that moment in time. The scale ranges from 1-7 with higher scores indicating more sleepiness. This test will be administered on a laptop.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMental sedation scorebaseline
The Visual Analog Mood Scale is a 16 question Likert type scale that assess different facets of a person's mental state. Questions 1,4,11, and 13 are summed together to get a mental sedation score. Higher scores indicate more sedation. This ranges from 0-400.This test will be administered on a laptop.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMental sedation score200 minutes post intervention
The Visual Analog Mood Scale is a 16 question Likert type scale that assess different facets of a person's mental state. Questions 1,4,11, and 13 are summed together to get a mental sedation score. Higher scores indicate more sedation. This ranges from 0-400.This test will be administered on a laptop.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPhysical sedation scorebaseline
The Visual Analog Mood Scale is a 16 question Likert type scale that assess different facets of a person's mental state. Questions 3,5,6, and 16 are summed together to get a physical sedation score. Higher scores indicate more physical sedation. This ranges from 0-400. This test will be administered on a laptop.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPhysical sedation score200 minutes post intervention
The Visual Analog Mood Scale is a 16 question Likert type scale that assess different facets of a person's mental state. Questions 3,5,6, and 16 are summed together to get a physical sedation score. Higher scores indicate more physical sedation. This ranges from 0-400. This test will be administered on a laptop.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMean reaction time to stimuli for PVTbaseline
The psychomotor vigilance test is given via a computer program and assesses different facets of a person's vigilance, or ability to pay attention. It will measure a participants mean reaction time to the stimuli presented (in milliseconds). Higher times indicate worse performance. This ranges from 0 to infinity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMean reaction time to stimuli for PVT200 minutes post intervention
The psychomotor vigilance test is given via a computer program and assesses different facets of a person's vigilance, or ability to pay attention. It will measure a participants mean reaction time to the stimuli presented (in milliseconds). Higher times indicate worse performance. This ranges from 0 to infinity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNumber of lapses in attention for PVTBaseline
The psychomotor vigilance test is given via a computer program and assesses different facets of a person's vigilance, or ability to pay attention. It will measure a participants number of lapses in attention to presented stimuli. The test considers any reaction over 500 milliseconds to be a lapse in attention. More lapses indicate worse performance. This ranges from 0 to infinity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNumber of lapses in attention for PVT200 minutes post intervention
The psychomotor vigilance test is given via a computer program and assesses different facets of a person's vigilance, or ability to pay attention. It will measure a participants number of lapses in attention to presented stimuli. The test considers any reaction over 500 milliseconds to be a lapse in attention. More lapses indicate worse performance. This ranges from 0 to infinity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMean lapse duration for PVTBaseline
The psychomotor vigilance test is given via a computer program and assesses different facets of a person's vigilance, or ability to pay attention. It will measure a participants number of lapses in attention to presented stimuli. The test considers any reaction over 500 milliseconds to be a lapse in attention. It measures the mean lapse duration for each participant. Longer lapses indicate worse performance. This ranges from 0 to infinity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMean lapse duration for PVT200 minutes post intervention
The psychomotor vigilance test is given via a computer program and assesses different facets of a person's vigilance, or ability to pay attention. It will measure a participants number of lapses in attention to presented stimuli. The test considers any reaction over 500 milliseconds to be a lapse in attention. It measures the mean lapse duration for each participant. Longer lapses indicate worse performance. This ranges from 0 to infinity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNumber of errors for PVTBaseline
The psychomotor vigilance test is given via a computer program and assesses different facets of a person's vigilance, or ability to pay attention. It will measure how many errors a person makes during the 10-minute test. More errors indicate worse performance. This ranges from 0 to infinity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNumber of errors for PVT200 minutes post intervention
The psychomotor vigilance test is given via a computer program and assesses different facets of a person's vigilance, or ability to pay attention. It will measure how many errors a person makes during the 10-minute test. More errors indicate worse performance. This ranges from 0 to infinity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryInterference score for mean reaction on FTBaseline
The Flanker Task is administered on a laptop. The test assesses the mean reaction time to congruent and incongruent scenarios presented to participants. The score is the difference when subtracting the mean reaction time for congruent scenarios from the mean reaction time for incongruent scenarios. Larger differences indicate more impairment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryInterference score for mean reaction on FT200 minutes post intervention
The Flanker Task is administered on a laptop. The test assesses the mean reaction time to congruent and incongruent scenarios presented to participants. The score is the difference when subtracting the mean reaction time for congruent scenarios from the mean reaction time for incongruent scenarios. Larger differences indicate more impairment.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
R01DA058678The Effects of Cannabidiol on the Driving Performance of Healthy AdultsRUDISILL, TONI MARIEWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITYNATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE2024 to 2025NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 12

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
1-Back TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition
2-Back TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Category FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition
Clock Drawing TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Continuous Performance TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Digit Span TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Eriksen Flanker TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Psychomotor Vigilance TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test ASecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test BSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal LearningSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)