ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT06786689

To Compare the Efficacy of Weekly Azathioprine Pulse Versus Betamethasone Oral Mini-Pulse in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Alopecia Areata

NCT06786689, Phase 2, Completed, Sheikh Zayed Medical College

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. To Compare the Efficacy of Weekly Azathioprine Pulse Versus Betamethasone Oral Mini-Pulse in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Alopecia Areata. Trials, record NCT06786689. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT06786689

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
To Compare the Efficacy of Weekly Azathioprine Pulse Versus Betamethasone Oral Mini-Pulse in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Alopecia Areata
NCT number
NCT06786689
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
60 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sheikh Zayed Medical College
Conditions
Alopecia Areata, Alopecia Areata(AA)
Interventions
Azathioprine (AZA), Betamethasone
First posted
2025-01-22
Last updated
2025-01-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes1

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimarySeverity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scoreClinical Assessment will be done monthly for 6 months
photographs of the standard four views of the scalp were captured at initial and follow-up appointments using a 50-megapixel Mobile camera under consistent lighting conditions. The Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score was determined by dividing the scalp into four sections according to their surface areas: the top at 40%, the back at 24%, and each side (left and right) at 18%. The SALT score calculation involved the sum of the percentage of hair loss from the left side (0.18) plus the right side (0.18), the vertex (0.40), and the back (0.24). SALT scores were evaluated at baseline, 12 weeks post-treatment initiation, and 3 months after completion of treatment. Treatment response was determined by using the formula: Percentage of hair regrowth= (SALT score at baseline - SALT score at follow-up) x100 / SALT score at baseline. Treatment response was further divided into 4 categories: Poor response (\<25% hair growth improvement from baseline), Moderate response (26-50% improvement), Goo

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06786689

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06786689/registered