ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT06863636

Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib/Acetaminophen Versus Celecoxib for Diagnosed Osteoarthritis in Acute Exacerbation

NCT06863636, Phase 3, Completed, Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V.

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib/Acetaminophen Versus Celecoxib for Diagnosed Osteoarthritis in Acute Exacerbation. Trials, record NCT06863636. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT06863636

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib/Acetaminophen Versus Celecoxib for Diagnosed Osteoarthritis in Acute Exacerbation
NCT number
NCT06863636
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
231 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V.
Conditions
Joint Pain, Knee Osteoarthritis, Hip Osteoarthritis
Interventions
Celecoxib + Acetaminophen, Celecoxib + Acetaminophen, Celecoxib
First posted
2025-03-07
Last updated
2026-10-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Comparison of the proportion of patients in each treatment group who, based on the baseline assessment, achieved a response according to the OMERACT-OARSI criteria at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6 of follow-up.
6 weeks
OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology) and OARSI (Osteoarthritis Research Society International) jointly developed a core outcome set (COS) for clinical trials in hip and knee osteoarthritis. This COS includes four key domains that should be assessed in all trials: pain, physical function, patient global assessment, and- for studies lasting one year or more-joint imaging. In this study, patients will be evaluated by the researcher at follow-up visits occurring at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6.
PrimaryNumber of participants Number of participants reporting treatment-related adverse events, as recorded in the patient diary.treatment-related adverse events through the patient's diary record.6 weeks
To describe the frequency, intensity, and causality of adverse events occurring during the clinical trial, stratified by treatment group. Adverse events will be documented by participants in their patient diaries. Each reported event will be monitored and followed up at the discretion of the investigator.
SecondaryTo analyze the mean change in pain scores, as measured by the WOMAC questionnaire, at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6 compared to baseline, by treatment group.6 weeks
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to assess physical function, pain, and stiffness in individuals with hip or knee osteoarthritis, based on their experiences over the past 48 hours. In this study, patients will be assessed by the investigator at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6 of follow-up.
SecondaryTo analyze the mean change in pain intensity, as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6 compared to baseline, stratified by treatment group.6 weeks
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain is a straight line where one end represents no pain and the other represents the worst pain imaginable. The investigator will administer the VAS at each visit to assess the patient's pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial, the percentage change in pain scores will be calculated and compared across treatment groups.
Secondary
Comparison of the proportion of subjects in each treatment group who achieve a reduction of ≥30% in pain intensity, as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6 compared to baseline.
6 weeks
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain is a unidimensional measurement instrument consisting of a straight line anchored by descriptors, with one end indicating "no pain" and the other representing "the worst pain imaginable." The investigator will administer the VAS at each study visit to evaluate changes in pain intensity. The proportion of patients achieving a pain reduction of more than 30% from baseline will be documented and compared among treatment groups at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6.
SecondaryTo analyze the difference in SF-36 quality of life questionnaire scores at six weeks after the initiation of the intervention, compared to baseline, by treatment group.6 weeks
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a generic health survey comprising 36 items designed to measure self-reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It evaluates multiple domains of physical and mental health and generates summary scores for both physical and mental components. In this study, the SF-36 questionnaire will be administered to each patient at baseline and again at Week 6 of follow-up.
OtherTo report the treatment adherence rate, expressed as a percentage, for each intervention group.6 weeks
Therapeutic adherence will be defined by the principal investigator. Adherence to treatment will be considered adequate if the patient has taken ≥80% of the prescribed doses by the time of the corresponding evaluation.
OtherTo describe the proportion of subjects experiencing therapeutic failure during the study, stratified by treatment group.6 weeks
Therapeutic failure will be defined by the principal investigator following a medical evaluation. The definition requires the presence of all the following criteria: (1) a change in pain intensity of less than 10 mm on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), or an increase in VAS score compared to baseline; (2) adherence to treatment of ≥80%; (3) a dosing regimen of every 12 hours (i.e., subjects with dose escalation) maintained for at least 7 days; and (4) absence of comorbidities that could contribute to increased pain, such as new trauma or falls.
OtherTo report the proportion of patients requiring dose escalation during the follow-up period, stratified by treatment group.6 weeks
At each study visit, dose escalation (one tablet or capsule every 12 hours) may be considered for patients in any of the three treatment arms who meet the following criteria: A decrease of less than 10 mm, no change, or an increase in pain intensity on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) compared to the previous visit. Treatment adherence of ≥80%.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
22563589BACKGROUNDPubMed
25207315BACKGROUNDPubMed
25979719BACKGROUNDPubMed
28530031BACKGROUNDPubMed
31908163BACKGROUNDPubMed
35551063BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06863636

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06863636/registered