ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT06873945

Registered outcomes38

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPart 1: Percentage of participants with absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score less than or equal to 20Week 24Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 20 between ritlecitinib 100 mg once-daily (QD) versus placebo
PrimaryPart 2: Percentage of participants with TEAEs, SAEs, and AEs leading to discontinuationBaseline to Follow-up visit (Week 52)Percentage of participants with events, based on those reported in the study including the safety follow-up period for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD
PrimaryPart 2: Percentage of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalitiesBaseline to Follow-up visit (Week 52)Percentage of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities, based on those reported in the study including the safety follow-up period for ritlecitinib 100 mg QD
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 20Week 24Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 20 between ritlecitinib 50 mg QD versus placebo
SecondaryPart 1: EU Only: Percentage of participants with Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) response, defined as a score of "moderately improved" or "greatly improved"Week 24Difference in percentage of participants with PGI-C response between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus placebo and ritlecitinib 50 mg QD versus placebo
SecondaryPart 1: US Only: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 20Week 36Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 20 between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus placebo
SecondaryPart 1: Change from baseline in SALT scoreWeek 24Difference in the mean absolute change from baseline in SALT score between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score equal to 0Week 24Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score equal to 0 between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus placebo and ritlecitinib 50 mg QD versus placebo
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 10Baseline through Week 24Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 10 between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 20Baseline through Week 24Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 20 between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score equal to 0Baseline through Week 24Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score equal to 0 between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
SecondaryPart 1: Change from baseline in SALT scoreBaseline through Week 24Difference in the mean absolute change from baseline in SALT score between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
Secondary
Part 1: Percentage of participants with EBA (Eyebrow Assessment) response, defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline or a score of 3 (among participants without a normal EBA score at baseline)
Baseline through Week 24Difference in the percentage of participants with EBA response (among participants without a normal EBA score at baseline) between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
Secondary
Part 1: Percentage of participants with ELA (Eyelash Assessment) response, defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline or a score of 3 (among participants without a normal ELA score at baseline)
Baseline through Week 24Difference in the percentage of participants with ELA response (among participants without a normal ELA score at baseline) between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of participants with PGI-C response, defined as a score of "moderately improved" or "greatly improved"Baseline through Week 24Difference in the percentage of participants with PGI-C response between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 10Week 24Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 10 between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus placebo and ritlecitinib 50 mg QD versus placebo
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of participants with EBA response, defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline or a score of 3 (among participants without a normal EBA score at baseline)Week 24
Difference in the percentage of participants with EBA response (among participants without a normal EBA score at baseline) between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus placebo and ritlecitinib 50 mg QD versus placebo
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of participants with ELA response, defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline or a score of 3 (among participants without a normal ELA score at baseline)Week 24
Difference in the percentage of participants with ELA response (among participants without a normal ELA score at baseline) between ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus placebo and ritlecitinib 50 mg QD versus placebo
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 20Week 48
Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 20 between ritlecitinib 50 mg non-responder (NR)--\>ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>ritlecitinib 50 mg QD
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of participants with absolute SALT score less than or equal to 10Week 48Difference in the percentage of participants with SALT score less than or equal to 10 between ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>ritlecitinib 100 mg QD versus ritlecitinib 50 mg NR--\>ritlecitinib 50 mg QD

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06873945/registered