ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Resilience Among Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder

NCT06954402, Not applicable, Recruiting, Johns Hopkins University

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleResilience Among Individuals With Opioid Use DisorderClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT06954402ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusRecruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment125 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsOpioid Use DisorderClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsAcute Stress Intervention (MAST-based), Non-Stress Intervention (NST-based)ClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2025-05-01ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-06-23ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimarySelf-Reported Trait Resilience as assessed by Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 25 (CD-RISC-25)Immediately after completing the taskInstrument: Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 25 Score Range: 0-100 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater resilience.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCognitive Flexibility: Stroop Color-Word Test reaction timeImmediately after completing the taskInstrument: Stroop Color-Word Test Unit: Milliseconds (ms) Interpretation: Higher values = slower performance (worse)ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryEmotional Flexibility: Emotional Stroop Task reaction timeImmediately after completing the taskInstrument: Emotional Stroop Task Unit: Milliseconds (ms) Interpretation: Higher values = slower performance (worse).ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryPerceived Controllability (Controllable) assessed by Social Controllability Task (SCT)Immediately after completing the taskInstrument: Social Controllability Task Description: Participants ratings on a 0-100% sliding scale. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater perceived control.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondarySubjective Effects of Stress as assessed by the Subjective Effects Visual Analog Scale (VAS) BatteryImmediately after completing the taskInstrument: Subjective Effects Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Battery Instrument: VAS (0-100 mm) Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater intensity of each subjective state.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryHeart RateImmediately after completing the taskUnit: Beats per minute (bpm) Interpretation: Higher = increased arousalClinicalTrials.gov
SecondarySystolic Blood PressureImmediately after completing the taskUnit: mmHg Interpretation: Higher = greater pressure.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryDiastolic Blood PressureImmediately after completing the taskUnit: mmHg Interpretation: Higher = greater pressure.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryOpioid Demand Breakpoint as assessed by the Hypothetical Purchase TaskImmediately after completing the taskInstrument: Hypothetical Purchase Task Range: $0-$500 Interpretation: Higher = greater demand.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPercentage of Resilience-themed Interview ContentUp to 1 year
This outcome is defined as the average percentage of narrative content within semi-structured qualitative interviews classified as "resilience-themed" using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). This measure quantifies the relative focus a participant places on adaptive coping and recovery narratives
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPercentage of Spirituality-themed Interview ContentUp to 1 year
This outcome is defined as the average percentage of narrative content within semi-structured qualitative interviews classified as "spirituality-themed" using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). This measure quantifies the relative focus a participant places on spiritual or existential frameworks as a component of their recovery.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMean Narrative Sentiment Valence ScoreUp to 1 year
A quantitative emotional-tone score calculated from participant interview transcripts using a standardized sentiment analysis algorithm. The score range is -1 to +1. A score of -1 represents a highly negative emotional valence, while a score of +1 represents a highly positive emotional valence. Higher scores indicate a more positive emotional narrative.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryIncremental Variance (∆R2) in Stress-Induced Opioid Demand Predicted by NLP IndicesFrom baseline up to 1 year
This outcome measures the change in R-squared (∆R2) when NLP-derived indices (topic proportions and sentiment) are added to a sequential regression model that already includes self-report and behavioral task scores. This measurement will be performed only on the subset of 45 participants who complete the qualitative interview sub-study. The outcome being predicted is the difference in opioid purchase breakpoints between the stress (MAST) and no-stress conditions.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
K08DA058057A Novel Human Laboratory Model of Resilience Among Individuals with Opioid Use DisorderMARTINEZ, SUKYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYNATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE2024 to 2025NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 3

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Emotional Stroop TaskPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Purchase TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)